Weili Lin1
1University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Neuro: Brain, Neuro: Brain function, Neuro: Brain Connectivity
Extensive efforts have recently focused on creating comprehensive brain charts spanning the human lifespan. These endeavors are driven by the significance of this line of research, the availability of several comprehensive large-scale biomedical databases, and the development of novel tools capable of harmonizing images acquired from various MRI scanners across multiple vendors and imaging parameters. In this presentation, we will explore critical aspects of lifespan imaging studies, covering study designs, data analysis tools, and recent key findings. Since the approaches for adult studies have been well-established, we will focus on essential considerations when imaging non-sedated pediatric subjects.
Extensive efforts have recently focused on creating comprehensive
brain charts spanning the human lifespan.
These activities are largely driven not only by the significance of this
line of research but also the availability of several comprehensive large-scale
biomedical databases. These databases
include, among others, the UK Biobank (https://www.ukbiobank.ac.uk/), Human
Connectome Project (https://www.humanconnectome.org/), Lifespan Connectome
Project https://www.humanconnectome.org/lifespan-studies), Alzheimer's Disease
Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) (https://adni.loni.usc.edu/), Adolescent Brain
Cognitive Development (ABCD) study (https://abcdstudy.org/) and more recently, HEALthy
Brain and Child Development (HBCD) study (https://hbcdstudy.org/#). These repositories not only contain images
but also encompass rich information such as genetic data, lifestyle factors,
cognitive assessments, and more, providing unprecedented resources for
researchers to explore potential relationships and predictions among different
phenotypes. Furthermore, the development
of novel imaging analysis tools capable of harmonizing images acquired from
imagers across multiple vendors and sets of imaging parameters(Carre A et al., 2022)
(Zuo L et al., 2021)
(Guan H et al., 2021)
(Grigorescu I et al., 2021)
(Chen J et al., 2021) (Fortin JP et al., 2018)
or acquisition methods that are less
dependent on scanner types, eg. MR Fingerprinting (Ma D et al., 2013) (Korzdorfer G et al., 2019),
further improve our ability to aggregate datasets from multiple studies.
In this presentation, we will discuss several critical
aspects of lifespan imaging studies, covering study designs, data analysis
tools and current key findings. Since much
progress has been made in establishing study designs, imaging approaches, and
image analysis tools (e.g, freesurfer (http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/)) for
adult studies, we will focus on essential considerations when imaging
non-sedated pediatric subjects.
Specifically, maintaining stillness during data acquisition is crucial
for obtaining high-quality MRI images, a challenge particularly pronounced in non-sedated
infants, toddlers, and young children who may find it difficult to comply with
this requirement. Moreover, the rapid
and dynamic temporal and spatial development of the young brain during the
early years presents additional complexities. Factors such as smaller brain
sizes and age-related variations in contrast among different brain tissues in
pediatric subjects necessitate tailored image analysis tools to address these
challenges effectively. Therefore, this
presentation will primarily concentrate on strategies for imaging non-sedated
pediatric subjects, encompassing study designs, imaging sequences, and
specialized image analysis tools. Furthermore, we will highlight results
related to creating comprehensive brain charts across the human lifespan. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
Carre A, Battistella E, Niyoteka S, Sun R,
Deutsch E, Robert C (2022), AutoComBat: a generic method for harmonizing
MRI-based radiomic features. Scientific reports 12:12762.
Chen
J, Sun Y, Fang Z, Lin W, Li G, Wang L, Consortium UUBCP (2021), Harmonized
neonatal brain MR image segmentation model for cross-site datasets. Biomed
Signal Process Control 69.
Fortin
JP, Cullen N, Sheline YI, Taylor WD, Aselcioglu I, Cook PA, Adams P, Cooper C,
et al. (2018), Harmonization of cortical thickness measurements across scanners
and sites. Neuroimage 167:104-120.
Grigorescu
I, Vanes L, Uus A, Batalle D, Cordero-Grande L, Nosarti C, Edwards AD, Hajnal
JV, et al. (2021), Harmonized Segmentation of Neonatal Brain MRI. Front
Neurosci 15:662005.
Guan
H, Liu Y, Yang E, Yap PT, Shen D, Liu M (2021), Multi-site MRI harmonization
via attention-guided deep domain adaptation for brain disorder identification.
Medical image analysis 71:102076.
Korzdorfer
G, Kirsch R, Liu K, Pfeuffer J, Hensel B, Jiang Y, Ma D, Gratz M, et al.
(2019), Reproducibility and Repeatability of MR Fingerprinting Relaxometry in
the Human Brain. Radiology 292:429-437.
Ma
D, Gulani V, Seiberlich N, Liu K, Sunshine JL, Duerk JL, Griswold MA (2013),
Magnetic resonance fingerprinting. Nature 495:187-192.
Zuo L, Dewey BE, Liu Y, He Y, Newsome SD, Mowry
EM, Resnick SM, Prince JL, et al. (2021), Unsupervised MR harmonization by
learning disentangled representations using information bottleneck theory.
Neuroimage 243:118569.