Chia-Feng Lu1
1Department of Biomedical Imaging and Radiological Sciences, National Yang Ming Chiao Tung University, Taipei, Taiwan
Synopsis
Keywords: Education Committee: Clinical MRI
Online teaching provides a more flexible learning approach, breaking free from spatial constraints. However, ensuring student engagement and learning outcomes becomes a crucial issue. Leveraging interactive teaching designs and online technological tools can effectively enhance students' attention and participation in online courses. The speaker will take the example of teaching an undergraduate course on magnetic resonance imaging to share a method of technology-enhanced learning, fostering online interaction and ensuring student learning outcomes.
Background
While
online teaching removes spatial limitations compared to in-person instruction,
it often faces challenges in ensuring students' attention due to the “screen
barrier”. Consequently, a one-way teaching approach, i.e., pure lecturing,
cannot guarantee student engagement and effective learning outcomes.Case Study
The speaker has taught the undergraduate course of Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine in his department for ten years. The intended learning
outcome was to let participants understand basic principles and apply imaging
techniques required for clinical practice. Being familiar with these imaging
techniques and making use of them is essential for radiological technologists. During
the COVID-19 pandemic, the course has been transitioned to online teaching. However,
the lecture-based teaching followed by the conventional midterm/final exam
failed to develop student’s critical thinking and teamwork skills for the
clinical environment. Furthermore, the one-way teaching approach highly reduced
students’ engagement, especially in online courses. Accordingly, the speaker has
redesigned this course by applying interactive design and technology-enhanced
learning. Kirkwood and Price stress that technology-enhanced learning with an
appropriate setup can induce changes in how university teachers teach and
learners learn, resulting in the enhancement of learning outcomes1.
Technologies also enable student-centered learning and practices by providing
an efficient environment for information retrieval, exchange, and generation2.
Biggs and Tang emphasize that "what and how students learn depends to a
major extent on how they think they will be assessed", and therefore, the
assessment tasks must align with the intended learning outcomes as the
authentic representation3. Accordingly, the speaker adjusted the assessment
by increasing the weighting of course participation from 10% to 40% and
assessed students' performance in small group discussions during the online
course. In order to effectively assess the results of the discussions and
facilitate the sharing and feedback, an online co-creation environment, Miro,
was used to foster critical thinking through technology-enhanced learning. The
student activities and discussions recorded at Miro have further become
important information for students’ review and teacher evaluations.
After taking this course, students started their clinical practicum
in teaching hospitals for 7 months. Feedback was then collected from students
and their clinical instructors: "Do you think the course helped
you/students perform better during the clinical practicum". Students
expressed that: "I blend in the clinical environment smoothly thanks to
the course design and activities". Clinical instructors also gave positive
feedback that students equipped required skills for medical imaging and
communication in clinical practice. In summary, by implementing the interactive
learning approach aligned with the intended learning outcomes in online courses,
students can achieve the goal of developing clinically required skills.Acknowledgements
This work was supported by grants from the Veterans General Hospitals and University System of Taiwan Joint Research Program (VGHUST113-G1-2-3).References
1. Kirkwood, A. and Price, L., Technology-enhanced learning
and teaching in higher education: what is ‘enhanced’ and how do we know? A
critical literature review. Learning, media and technology, 2014. 39(1), 6-36.
2. Hannafin, M. J. and Land, S. M., Technology and
student-centered learning in higher education: Issues and practices. Journal of
Computing in Higher Education, 2000. 12(1), 3-30.
3. Biggs, J. B. and Tang, C., Teaching for quality learning
at university: What the student does. McGraw-hill education (UK), 2011.