SHA LIU1, NAN SUN1, ZHEN GUAN1, XIAO TING LI1, YU XIN YANG2, and KE XUE2
1Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, BEI JING, China, 2MR Collaboration, United Imaging Research Institute of Intelligent Imaging, BEI JING, China
Synopsis
Keywords:
Motivation: Torso enhanced CT is the standard method for colon cancer staging. MRI is a complimentary method. Our purpose is to develop a MR Colon cancer scanning method with simple process and short scan time.
Goal(s): develop a new T2WI breath-hold scanning technique that eliminates the need for bowel preparation and reduces scan time
Approach: compared the image quality between trans-axial T2WI and axial T2WI in visualization of anatomical structure
Results: Patient examination time for our colon MRI is less than 10min, compared with conventional MRI, our approach offered a simplified and expedited means of visualizing lesion details with superior clarity.
Impact: Our
research focused on MRI scan optimization. Without bowel preparation, using
breath-hold, our creative trans-axial imaging plan becomes highly manageable
and enables efficient repetition of the entire process.
Introduction
Contrast-enhanced
CT (CE-CT) is the primary imaging modality for evaluating colon cancer (CC). However,
its soft tissue contrast is often suboptimal and may inadequately fulfill
diagnostic requirements. MRI can provide excellent soft tissue contrast, and
several studies [1] have evaluated the performance of T2-weighted imaging
(T2WI) in CC staging and validated its critical role, especially for locally
advanced CC. However, challenges such as complex patient preparation, long scan
time, and unstable image quality associated with colonic T2WI limit its wide
application in clinical practice. Thus it is currently used to screen patients
with liver metastasis or exhibiting allergies to iodine-based contrast agents. Thus
our study aimed to optimize the T staging colon T2WI scan by obtain the tumor
trans-axial image from dual oblique plane by optimizing
the scan process by eliminating bowel preparation, using breath hold instead of
triggered scan. We also proposed to compare the image quality of tumor trans-axial
T2WI with axial T2WI to approve the effectiveness of the MRI workflow.
Methods
From
September 2022 to July 2023, totally 32 patients (14 males, age: median 57
years old, 34-79 years old) were retrospectively enrolled. Inclusion criteria: patients
with biopsy confirmed colon cancer; the ability to hold the breath in 20sec; complete
image information, and the image information should be uniformly transmitted
into our hospital's impact filing and communication system (PACS). Exclusion
criteria: Patients who experience claustrophobia, had a colonoscopy within the
past month, or have refused MRI.
MRI was performed on a
3.0T scanner (uMR790, United Imaging Healthcare) with a 24-channel super
flexible body coil. All T2WI was acquired with the FSE sequence combined with
AI-assisted Compressed Sensing (ACS) technology. We regularly scanned full
abdomen breath-hold (BH) coronal T2WI with a scan time of 15s, triggered axial
DWI with a scan time of 2 minute 40 s, BH axial T1 with a scan time of 15s. For
the trans-axial scan, the following steps were employed (Figure 1): (1) obtain
the first oblique T2WI by aligning positioning line parallel to the long axis
of tumor-located colon on coronal T2WI (fig 1a), scan time=8s; (2) obtain the second
oblique T2WI by making positioning line parallel to the long axis of
tumor-located colon on the first oblique T2WI (fig 1b), scan time=8s; (3)
obtain trans-axial T2WI by drawing positioning line perpendicular to the long
axis of tumor-located colon on both first and second oblique T2WI (fig 1c,1d).
The scan parameters were as follows: TR/TE=2400ms/110ms, FOV=280*280mm2,
pixel size=0.7*0.7mm2, slice thickness=3mm, 20-30 slices, scan time=30-45s.
A full abdomen coverage BH axial T2WI were acquired with following parameters: TR/TE=4400ms/110ms,
FOV=320*300mm2, pixel size=0.8*0.8mm2, slice
thickness=5mm, 50 slices, scan time=45s, this sequence and parameters were commonly
used for colon MRI but with respiratory trigger in the past literature.
The colon MRI scan time was
no more than 5min, resulting in a total patient examination time of approximately
10min. Patient preparation entailed a minimum 4-hour fasting period with no
bowel preparation and the administration of intramuscular injection
antispasmodic agents.
Two experienced
radiologists independently evaluated image quality parameters for trans-axial
T2WI and axial T2WI, including the bowel wall visualization and peritoneum or
mesentery clarity. Clarity was scored on a scale from 1 to 4, where 1 represented
the structure was indistinguishable, 2 represented the structure was visible with
blurring outline 3 represented the structure was clearly displayed but the
outline was smooth, and 4 represented the structure was clearly displayed and
the outline was sharp. A third experienced radiologist was introduced for Arbitrition.
SPSS 22.0 IBM
statistical software was used. A Wilcoxon Signed Ranks Test was applied to compare
the difference of clarity scores in trans-axial T2WI and conventional axial
T2WI, with
p<0.05 indicating statistical significance.
Results
MRI trans-axial T2WI
images showed better visualization of the bowel wall (2.81-3.13v.s.2.09-2.47,
P<0.001), and the peritoneum or mesentery display (2.69-2.75v.s.1.94-1.97,
P<0.001) than axial T2WI.
Discussion and
Conclusion
Axial
T2WI was main scan plane in the literature, some author used single oblique
plane. Neither was perfect for structure description because of partial volume
effect [2]. Our optimized workflow for colon T2WI significantly improved the
image quality, effectively mitigating the partial volume effect and offering
radiologists high-quality images for more accurate diagnosis. Besides, compared
with conventional axial T2WI, our workflow requires no specific patient
preparation, reduces scan time in 10 minutes for expeditious imaging, and
eliminates the need for contrast enhancement, thereby minimizing renal burden. This
study excluded patients who were unable to hold their breath, as the
optimization of scanning protocols for such cases is the subject of other
ongoing studies.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1]Soo Yeun Park,Seung
Hyun Cho,Min A.Lee Ghilsuk YoonY, et al. Diagnostic performance
of MRI- versus MDCT-categorized T3cd/T4 for identifying high-risk stage II or
stage III colon cancers: a pilot study. Abdominal Radiology(2019) 44:1675-1685doi:
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00261-018-1822-7.
[2]Seren R Rafaelsen ,
Claus Dam , Chris Vagn-Hansen, et al. CT and 3 Tesla MRI in
the TN Staging of Colon Cancer: A Prospective, Blind Study. European Journal of
Radiology 121 (2019) 108741:2022, 29(2), 1069-1079;doi:
https://doi.org/10.3390/curroncol29020091.