Christian Waldenberg1,2, Harald Foss1, Hanna Hebelka3, Helena Brisby4, and Kerstin Lagerstrand1,2
1Department of Medical Radiation Sciences, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 2Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden, 3Department of Radiology, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden, 4Department of Orthopaedics, University of Gothenburg, Gothenburg, Sweden
Synopsis
Keywords: Bone, Data Analysis, Spine
Motivation: Modic Changes (MCs) are often heterogeneous and difficult to classify objectively. Hence, new diagnostic tools are required to improve MC classification.
Goal(s): This study aims to develop a data-driven model for the classification of MC lesions on a per-lesion and per-voxel level from conventional MR images.
Approach: Conventional MR images from 12 patients were used to create an MC classification model by fitting three multivariate normal distribution functions to the MRI MC data which was subsequently used for MC classification.
Results: The model reached high accuracy (74-100%), enabling a detailed classification on a per-voxel level and longitudinal tracking of MC transitions.
Impact: This study introduces a data-driven model for classifying Modic changes in vertebral bone marrow using MR images. The model achieves high accuracy, enabling detailed classification and tracking of Modic change transitions, potentially improving patient diagnosis and care.
Introduction
Pathological
lesions in the subchondral vertebral bone marrow, so-called Modic changes (MC),
are composed of hypervascular tissue, fat, and sclerosis
and are known to be associated with pain [1]. MC lesions are often mixed
and contain several types of MCs, making the subjective classification process
of these heterogeneous lesions challenging and prone to large variations in
intra- and interobserver performance. This may explain why there is a lack of clinical evidence supporting the effect of MC on
clinical outcomes in patients with pain. Hence, new diagnostic tools are
required to improve MC classification and to clarify the pathogenesis of MC.
Consequently, recent research has focused on data-driven methods to
automatically classify the MC lesions. However,
classification methods that can handle heterogeneous lesions are lacking. This
study aimed to develop a data-driven model for the classification of MC
lesions on a per-lesion and per-voxel level from conventional MR images.Methods
19 MCs in 12 patients (47±10 years, 6 men (50%)), that were
considered to be composed of one type of MC (“pure MC”), were included. Using
the T1-weighted (T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) images, one radiologist classified
the MC-lesions according to the Modic classification system. The MCs were
outlined by a medical student supervised by an experienced radiologist,
creating a region of interest (ROI) for each lesion. The lesion voxel
intensities were normalized to healthy vertebrae (normal tissue) and
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) to compensate for possible differences in magnetic
resonance signal amplification and differences in water and fat concentrations
between subjects.
The MC type of each voxel in the MC lesion was predicted by
fitting three multivariate normal distribution functions to the normalized T1W
and T2W values of the MC lesions. This generated three partially overlapping probability
density functions (PDFs), one for each MC type. With
normalized T1W and T2W voxel values as input, the PDF generating the highest
probability determined the type of MC for that voxel (Figure 1).
To classify an entire MC lesion, first, all individual
pixels in the lesion were classified in the manner described. The PDF that
generated the highest relative likelihood for the majority of pixels in the
specific lesion determined the MC type for that lesion.
The classification model was validated using 10-fold
cross-validation and evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and
accuracy. Further, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area
under curve (AUC) were calculated.
The classification model was validated using 10-fold
cross-validation and evaluated in terms of sensitivity, specificity, and
accuracy. Further, a receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and the area
under curve (AUC) were calculated.Results
Out of 19 MC lesions, eight were MC1, nine were MC2, and two were MC3. The classification
model was found to display a good discriminating ability for all three MC types:
On a per-lesion level, the model reached a sensitivity of 88%, 56%, and
100%, a specificity of 64%, 90%, and 100%, an accuracy of 74%, 74%, and 100% and
an AUC of 0.81, 0.81, and 1.00 for MC1, MC2 and MC3 respectively.
On a per-voxel level, the model reached a sensitivity of 81%, 71%, and
90%, a specificity of 75%, 88%, and 97%, an accuracy of 77%, 78%, and 96%, and an
AUC of 0.87, 0.89, and 0.98 for MC1, MC2, and MC3 respectively (Figure 2).Discussion
The study addressed challenges
in classifying Modic changes (MC) using a data-driven model, achieving high
accuracy (74-100%), enabling a detailed classification and longitudinal
tracking of MC transitions. Several previous contributions have improved MC identification and classification [2,
3]. However, none compensate for the variability in water and fat
concentration between individuals, which may impact the models'
generalizability to a diverse population.
This
study explores MC lesion heterogeneity, allowing for the identification of
regions with different MC subtypes. Notably, there are potential patches of
multiple MC subtypes within individual lesions used as ground truth (Figure 3),
which could explain the overlap in the PDFs for MC1 and MC2, warranting further
investigation.Conclusions
The method confidently classified the MCs on a per-lesion and per-voxel level, enabling precise and objective
classification of MCs and supporting longitudinal tracking of regional Modic
transitions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Mok, F.P.S., et al., Modic changes of the lumbar spine:
prevalence, risk factors, and association with disc degeneration and low back
pain in a large-scale population-based cohort. The Spine Journal, 2016. 16(1): p. 32-41.
2. Jamaludin, A., T. Kadir, and A.
Zisserman, SpineNet: Automated
classification and evidence visualization in spinal MRIs. Med Image Anal,
2017. 41: p. 63-73.
3. Athertya, J.S., G.
Saravana Kumar, and J. Govindaraj, Detection
of Modic changes in MR images of spine using local binary patterns.
Biocybernetics and Biomedical Engineering, 2019. 39(1): p. 17-29.