Kazumi Kasahara1,2, Keigo Hikishima3, Mariko Nakata4, Tomokazu Tsurugizawa1, Noriyuki Higo1, and Kenji Doya2
1Human Informatics and Interaction Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan, 2Neural Computation Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, Okinawa, Japan, 3Health and Medical Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Japan, 4University of Tsukuba, Tsukuba, Japan
Synopsis
Keywords: Functional Connectivity, Neuroscience
Motivation: It is unclear how and what cellular-level changes cause changes in the whole-brain network in operant training.
Goal(s): To investigate the functional network changes and underlying cellular processes involved in operant learning.
Approach: We utilized resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rsfMRI) and whole-brain immunohistochemical analysis of early growth response 1 (EGR1) in mice during the early and late stages of training.
Results: Increased functional connectivity and EGR1 regional correlations were observed between the limbic and thalamus or auditory cortex early, and between motor and somatosensory cortex and striatum in the late stage.
Impact: Our study is an initial effort to create a new experimental approach
that combines rsfMRI and immunohistochemistry to connect large-scale and
small-scale mechanisms of learning.
Introduction
Operant conditioning, the process of acquiring
new skills, is used for training animals to learn certain behaviors by
associating new actions, such as lever pulling, button pressing, and nose
pokes, with rewards. The process involves specific regions of the brain, such
as the amygdala, basal ganglia, frontal cortex, and lateral septum, which are
responsible for fear learning, reward prediction, decision-making, and social
playing. Electrophysiological experiments have shown enhanced activity and
interactions in these regions, but most studies have focused on individual
regions with implanted electrodes1,2, leaving the whole brain
network unclear. To address this, we hypothesized that immunohistochemical
analyses for EGR1, the protein product of Egr1, and resting-state functional
connectivity (FC) could be used to reveal when, where, and how learning changes
connectivity at the cellular (EGR1 expression) and macro (resting-state FC)
level3,4. We used histological analysis of an immediate early gene
and rsfMRI to investigate spatiotemporal functional network shifts in
resting-state FC and neural activity before and after early-stage and late-stage
training.Method
The
study used 64 adult male C57/BL6N mice that were aged 7 weeks old. The Ethics
Committee (approval number: 2017-178, 2020-0362) approved all procedures. The
six groups of mice were observed to study the temporal and spatial changes in
the whole-brain FC and cellular-level responses with operant conditioning (Fig.
1). Mice were trained to press two different buttons in order, left and then
right. If they pressed the buttons in the correct sequence, they were given
sucrose water. However, if they made a mistake, they were punished with a flash
of light and had to wait 2 seconds before trying again. The rsfMRI was obtained using a Bruker BioSpec 117/11 11.7 Tesla
MRI scanner for 10 min (repetition time = 2000 ms, echo time =
15 ms, 300 scans). All mice were initially
anesthetized with 4% isoflurane, with 2% isoflurane during set-up on the animal
bed, and 1.2% isoflurane with air for rsfMRI. We calculated the fMRI
signals in 142 regions, excluding the cerebellum, which was divided based on
the Allen Brain Atlas, and estimated the functional connectivity between these
regions using CONN. Two-hundred
and sixteen sections, excluding the olfactory bulb and cerebellum, were
selected for histological analysis of EGR1-immunopositive cells. Each brain region
that had significant resting-state FC was captured with a digital camera
mounted to a microscope. We counted the number of EGR1-immunopositive cells on
each side of the hemisphere within the targeted region with ilastik and ImageJ
Fiji.Results
After three
days of training, resting-state functional connectivity (rsFC) increased
between the limbic areas and the thalamus or auditory cortex (Fig. 2a). After
21 days of training, the increase in rsFC primarily occurred between the motor
cortex, the somatosensory cortex, and the striatum (Fig. 3a). We also tested
for inter-regional correlation in the numbers of EGR-1-positive cells. During
the early stage, Pearson's r in the training group was significantly higher
than that in the no-training group between the auditory cortex and the amygdala,
between motor cortices, and between motor and primary somatosensory cortices (p
< 0.05). However, r between the auditory and primary somatosensory cortices
and the auditory cortex and the striatum was significantly lower in the
training group (Fig. 2b). During the later stage, r was found to be
significantly higher in the training group as compared to the no-training group
between the primary somatosensory cortex and the striatum, the primary
somatosensory cortex and the motor cortex, and the primary somatosensory cortex
and the auditory cortex (Fig. 3b, p < 0.05). Discussion
The study
reveals how the combination of resting-state fMRI and immunohistochemistry can
uncover the cellular-level changes underlying whole-brain dynamics. It also
demonstrates the spatiotemporal shift of network dynamics during different
phases of training. During the early stages of training, subcortical networks
of the limbic system related to reward were dominant, whereas during the late
stages of training, cortical networks related to consolidation and
reconsolidation formed stronger connections. This study successfully visualized
the temporal shifts in brain regions involved in behavioral learning and
demonstrated their plasticity for the first time by combining MRI and
histological analysis. It is the first step towards establishing an
experimental system that combines both MRI and whole-brain immunohistochemical
analysis.Abbreviation
Lateral
septal nucleus ventral (LSv), lateral septal nucleus dorsal (LSd), central nucleus of the amygdala (CEA), dorsal auditory cortex (AUDd), striatum (Str), primary somatosensory upper
limb (S1ul), secondary somatosensory
(S2), primary motor (M1), and secondary motor (M2).Acknowledgements
This study was funded by the Japan Society for
the Promotion of Science grants KAKANHI 21K19463 and KAKANHI 20H04236 (KK) and Japan
Science and Technology Agency grant FORESTO JPMJFR206G (KK). References
1. Hamel L, Cavdaroglu B, Yeates D, et al. Cortico-Striatal Control over Adaptive Goal-Directed Responding Elicited by Cues Signaling Sucrose Reward or Punishment. J Neurosci. 2022:42:3811-3822.
2. Zimmermann KS, Yamin JA, Rainnie DG, et al. Connections of the Mouse Orbitofrontal Cortex and Regulation of Goal-Directed Action Selection by Brain-Derived Neurotrophic Factor. Biol Psychiatry 2017:81:366-377.
3. Sampaio-Baptista C, Filippini N, Stagg CJ, et al. Changes in functional connectivity and GABA levels with long-term motor learning. Neuroimage 2015:106:15-20.
4. Veyrac A, Besnard A, Caboche J, et al. The transcription factor Zif268/Egr1, brain plasticity, and memory. Prog Mol Biol Transl Sci 2014:122:89-129.