Yanlu Wang1
1Oncology-Pathology, Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, Sweden
Synopsis
Keywords: Phantoms, Interventional Devices, Rapid prototyping, medical devices, phantoms, biopsy
Motivation: This study is motivated by the authors to easily, and cheaply, manufacture phantoms and other accessories that is inherently dimensionally accurate, MRI compatible, and visible in MRI images.
Goal(s): The goal of the study is to develop a manufacturing method to create a MRI-visible localization grid for MR-guided breast biopsies.
Approach: By hollowing out the part without inclusions of any drainage holes, we can ensure liquid resin is trapped inside the part during the printing process.
Results: The finished part is shown to be inherently MRI visible as demonstrated on both T1- and T2-weighted images from our MRI biopsy protocol.
Impact: This approach offers an efficient and cost-effective
solution for creating MRI-visible objects with high spatial accuracy, which is useful for producing phantoms and other MRI compatible accessories.
Introduction
Digital Light Processing (DLP), a type of 3D printing
technology utilizing UV-hardened resin plastics, has gained prominence due to
its ability to produce finely detailed objects with inherent liquid-tight
properties[1]–[3].
In DLP printing, liquid UV-hardened resin is poured into a vat with a
transparent bottom, cured using UV light exposure, and lifted layer by layer to
construct the object. DLP technology's accuracy and ability to replicate
intricate details make it suitable for printing MRI phantoms. Drainage holes
are typically incorporated into the objects to allow unhardened resin to escape
during the printing process. If this step is omitted, liquid resin can be
trapped inside, making it visible in MRI scans. Leveraging this phenomenon,
along with DLP's high precision, this paper presents a cost-effective and
efficient method for producing MRI-visible objects with minimal spatial
tolerance.
One crucial application of this approach is the creation of
MRI-visible grid systems for MR-guided breast biopsies. MR-guided biopsies rely
on MRI scans for locating the biopsy target, and a grid system made of hard
plastic assists in spatial localization. However, the conventional grid, being
MRI-invisible, necessitates tight skin contact, which is not always achievable
due to breast tissue characteristics and grid design limitations. The inability
to establish precise correlation between the biopsy target and the grid can
lead to procedure cancellations, which is far from ideal considering that
MR-guided biopsies are typically performed as a last resort when other
diagnostic methods prove insufficient[4].Purpose
This study focuses on designing, manufacturing, and
evaluating the feasibility of using DLP 3D printing technology to create an
MRI-visible localization grid for MR-guided breast biopsies. Materials and Methods
The study employed Digital Light Processing (DLP) 3D
printing technology (Anycubic Mono) to create MRI-visible phantoms, with a
focus on an MRI-visible grid system for MR-guided breast biopsies. The design
of the grid was established using 3D CAD software (Onshape,
http://www.onshape.com), ensuring a 1.4mm-thick outer shell to contain liquid resin
(Fig. 1). Anycubic's proprietary slicer software (Photon Workshop, v2.1.24),
was used to prepare the 3D model for printing, with a critical emphasis on
hollowing the part where MR visibility is desired, lack of drainage holes, and
adjusting Z-lift height such that the unfinished part never lifts above liquid
resin levels in the vat to ensure maximum amount of liquid resin retention
inside the finished part (Fig. 2). Post-production steps included the removal
of residue liquid resin and UV curing as per standard procedure. The MRI
visibility of the grid was evaluated using T1- and T2-weighted MRI sequences
used in our MR-guided breast biopsy protocol.Results
We demonstrate the successful use of Digital Light
Processing (DLP) 3D printing technology to create MRI-visible phantoms,
particularly an MRI-visible grid system for MR-guided breast biopsies. The
MRI-visible grid was designed and manufactured with a 1.4mm-thick outer shell
to contain UV-hardened resin, ensuring the object's liquid-tight properties. By
printing large surfaces at an angle, the printing process's robustness was
improved. The finished part was fitted onto our existing MR-guided biopsy setup and the MRI visibility of the grid was confirmed in T1- and
T2-weighted MRI sequences in the biopsy MRI protocol (Fig. 3). Discussion
This approach offers an efficient and cost-effective
solution for creating MRI-visible objects with high spatial accuracy, which can
significantly enhance the accuracy and confidence of MR-guided biopsy
procedures.
There exist several unique challenges posed by the
application of DLP 3D printing technology to create MRI-visible phantoms.
Firstly, the necessity of constructing designs that allow for MRI-visible
sections to be encased within a hardened outer shell of considerable thickness to
ensure the phantom's durability. Tougher materials such as “ABS-like” or engineering resin is preferred
as the potential for fractures resulting in resin leakages in parts produced
using conventional UV-hardened resins is high. Depending on material color,
some background UV light shining through the object and slowly curing the
liquid resin inside parts is inevitable, hence long-term MR visibility is
questionable. Long-term observations have not yet been thoroughly conducted.
Ultimately, the study demonstrated the potential of this
method for creating MRI-visible phantoms and markers for biomedical
applications. Conclusion
In conclusion, this study highlights the successful
application of DLP 3D printing technology in creating dimensionally accurate
MRI-visible phantoms for use in MR-guided biopsies. This innovative approach
simplifies the spatial localization process, enhancing confidence and accuracy
in MR-guided procedures. The method presented here has the potential to
revolutionize the creation of MRI-visible objects for a wide range of
biomedical applications, offering cost-effective and precise solutions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] M. F. Bieniosek, B.
J. Lee, and C. S. Levin, ‘Technical Note: Characterization of custom 3D printed
multimodality imaging phantoms’, Med. Phys., vol. 42, no. 10, pp.
5913–5918, 2015, doi: 10.1118/1.4930803.
[2] P.
Ramachandran et al., ‘A 3D printed phantom to assess MRI geometric
distortion’, Biomed. Phys. Eng. EXPRESS, vol. 7, no. 3, p. 035004, May
2021, doi: 10.1088/2057-1976/abeb7e.
[3] I.
A. Tsolakis, W. Papaioannou, E. Papadopoulou, M. Dalampira, and A. I. Tsolakis,
‘Comparison in Terms of Accuracy between DLP and LCD Printing Technology for
Dental Model Printing’, Dent. J., vol. 10, no. 10, p. 181, Sep. 2022,
doi: 10.3390/dj10100181.
[4] P.
Viehweg, A. Heinig, B. Amaya, T. Alberich, M. Laniado, and S. H.
Heywang-Köbrunner, ‘MR-guided interventional breast procedures considering
vacuum biopsy in particular’, Eur. J. Radiol., vol. 42, no. 1, pp.
32–39, Apr. 2002, doi: 10.1016/s0720-048x(01)00479-x.