Xiaolian Su1, Lidi Wan1, Yitong Wang1, Jieying Chen1, Qingqing Wen2, Pu-Yeh Wu2, and Guangyu Tang1
1Radiology, Shanghai Tenth People’s Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, China, 2MR Research,GE Healthcare, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Cartilage, Cartilage
Motivation: The detection of early cartilage degeneration by UTE-MRI has been demonstrated in many in vitro experiments but lacks validation in in vivo studies.
Goal(s): To explore the feasibility of UTE-MRI quantitative imaging in the diagnosis of early cartilage degeneration in vivo, compare the diagnostic efficacy of various sequences and explore their corresponding pathological and biochemical basis.
Approach: Volunteers were recruited preoperatively to perform MRI for comparison with postoperative pathology.
Results: UTE-MRI values have shown greater in vivo diagnostic value for early cartilage degeneration compared to conventional T2 and T1ρ values, and mainly reflect different aspects of cartilage degeneration.
Impact: Validating
the clinical utility of UTE-MRI in vivo for diagnosing early cartilage
degeneration contributes to the early detection and intervention of articular
cartilage degeneration in osteoarthritis patients.
Introduction
In clinical studies, non-invasive conventional MRI protocols such as
T1ρ, T2 mapping, and T2* mapping are often utilized to detect early cartilage
degeneration (1). However, they may not capture signals from all layers of
cartilage, especially the calcified and deep layers, due to their relatively
long echo times. Ultra-short echo time (UTE) sequences have been developed and
increasingly employed to overcome the aforementioned shortcomings, with echo
times as short as 8 μs (2). And there are few reports on using UTE-MRI
quantitative imaging to detect early cartilage degeneration in vivo, especially
the research on the pathophysiological and biochemical basis of imaging is
rare. Therefore, it is necessary to compare the advantages and disadvantages of
various UTE-MRI quantitative imaging techniques in the early diagnosis of
cartilage degeneration in vivo and explore its pathological and biochemical
basis.Methods
Twenty volunteers with osteoarthritis (OA) for total knee arthroplasty
(TKA) at Shanghai Tenth People's Hospital were prospectively recruited between
June 2020 and August 2021. UTE-MRI sequences (UTE-MT, UTE-AdiabT1ρ and UTE-T2*
mapping) and conventional sequences (CubeQuant-T2 and CubeQuant-T1ρ) were
performed one day before the operation of the affected knee cartilage. Seven
regions of interests (ROIs) were manually drawn on the mid-sagittal section of
the tibial plateau and four ROIs on lateral femoral condyle images for each
patient to calculate the UTE-MRI quantitative values. During TKA, cartilage
samples (including the replaced lateral femoral condyle and tibial plateau)
were collected in strict accordance with the preset positions corresponding to MRI
images. Then, the pathological and biochemical components of the corresponding
ROI were obtained, including histological grading (Mankin scores),
glycosaminoglycan (GAG) content (constituting PG), collagen structural
integrity and water content of the cartilage. The integrity of collagen
structure was assessed using the PLM-CO scores, which range from total
disorganization (score 0) to healthy zonal architecture (score 5) (3). The
receiver operating characteristic (ROC) was conducted to evaluate the
performance of three UTE-MRI quantitative imaging techniques.Results
91 ROIs from volunteers of
7 males (age range: 68 to 78 years; 74±3 years) and 13 females (age range: 57
to 79 years; 67±6 years) were evaluated, and divided into four groups according to Mankin score:
normal cartilage (grade 1 for scores 0-1, n=17); mild degeneration (grade 2 for
scores 2-5, n=38); moderate degeneration (grade 3 for scores 6-9, n=28); and
severe degeneration (grade 4 for scores 10-14, n=8) (Fig. 1). UTE-based magnetization transfer ratio (UTE-MTR) (r=-0.619,
P <.001), UTE-AdiabT1ρ (r=0.568, P <.001), and UTE-T2* values
(r=-0.495, P <.001) showed higher correlation with Mankin scores than
T2 values (r=0.287, P=.006) and T1ρ values (r=0.435, P<.001) (Fig. 2). Of them, UTE-MTR had the highest diagnostic
performance on early cartilage degeneration (AUC=0.824, P<.001) (Fig. 3). UTE-MTR values performed moderate correlation with PLM-CO
(r=0.536, P<.001), UTE-AdiabT1ρ value performed moderate correlation
with GAG content (r=-0.652, P<.001), while UTE-T2* value performed
moderate correlation with W/D ratio (r=-0.518, P<.001).Discussion
It
is found that three quantitative UTE-MRI sequences all showed the higher
correlation with Mankin scores than T2 and T1ρ value. And UTE-MTR and
UTE-AdiabT1ρ values were able to distinguish normal cartilage from mildly
degenerated cartilage, while UTE-T2* and T2 and T1ρ values lacked the ability. UTE-MRI
enables the full-layer evaluation of cartilage that cannot be displayed by
conventional MRI sequences (4). Additionally, the magic angle effect still had
an impact on UTE-T2* and UTE-T1ρ quantitative analysis (5, 6). The value
influenced by the magic angle may obscure the effect of cartilage degeneration,
thereby impacting the accuracy of the results. However, it has been confirmed
that UTE-MT and UTE-AdiabT1ρ exhibited reduced sensitivity to the magic angle
effect and will help to improve the robustness of quantitative UTE-MRI
sequences (7, 8). UTE-MTR and UTE-AdiabT1ρ values respectively performed
moderate correlation with PLM-CO and GAG content. The biochemical alterations of early cartilage
degeneration existed in the extracellular matrix (ECM), including the loss of
normal collagen network structure and reduction of PG, instead of cartilage
fibrillation and fragmentation which happened in the advanced OA (9).UTE-T2*
values performed moderate correlation with W/D ratio and this may be why
UTE-T2* values failed to distinguish normal and mild cartilage degeneration,
but performs well in mild to moderate and mild to severe cartilage
degeneration.Conclusion
Quantitative UTE-MRI values have shown greater in vivo diagnostic value
for early cartilage degeneration compared to conventional T2 and T1ρ values. Of
them, UTE-MTR has the highest efficiency in diagnosing early cartilage
degeneration. UTE-MTR、UTE-AdiabT1ρ and UTE-T2* values can mainly reflect different aspects of
cartilage degeneration, namely integrity of collagen structure, PG content and
water content, respectively.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. Palmer AJ, Brown CP, McNally EG, et al. Non-invasive imaging of
cartilage in early osteoarthritis. The bone & joint journal.
2013;95-b(6):738-46. doi:10.1302/0301-620x.95b6.31414
2. Siriwanarangsun P, Statum S, Biswas R, Bae WC, Chung CB. Ultrashort
time to echo magnetic resonance techniques for the musculoskeletal system.
Quant Imaging Med Surg. 2016;6(6):731-43. doi:10.21037/qims.2016.12.06
3. Changoor A, Tran-Khanh N, Méthot S, et al. A polarized light
microscopy method for accurate and reliable grading of collagen organization in
cartilage repair. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2011;19(1):126-35.
doi:10.1016/j.joca.2010.10.010
4. Afsahi AM, Sedaghat S, Moazamian D, et al. Articular Cartilage
Assessment Using Ultrashort Echo Time MRI: A Review. Front Endocrinol
(Lausanne). 2022;13:892961. doi:10.3389/fendo.2022.892961
5. Du J, Chiang AJ, Chung CB, et al. Orientational analysis of the
Achilles tendon and enthesis using an ultrashort echo time spectroscopic
imaging sequence. Magn Reson Imaging. 2010;28(2):178-84.
doi:10.1016/j.mri.2009.06.002
6. Du J, Statum S, Znamirowski R, Bydder GM, Chung CB. Ultrashort TE
T1ρ magic angle imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2013;69(3):682-7.
doi:10.1002/mrm.24296
7. Wu M, Ma YJ, Kasibhatla A, et al. Convincing evidence for magic
angle less-sensitive quantitative T(1ρ) imaging of articular cartilage using
the 3D ultrashort echo time cones adiabatic T(1ρ) (3D UTE cones-AdiabT(1ρ) ) sequence. Magn
Reson Med. 2020;84(5):2551-60. doi:10.1002/mrm.28317
8. Ma YJ, Shao H, Du J, Chang EY. Ultrashort echo time magnetization
transfer (UTE-MT) imaging and modeling: magic angle independent biomarkers of
tissue properties. NMR Biomed. 2016;29(11):1546-52. doi:10.1002/nbm.3609
9. Qian Y, Williams AA, Chu CR, Boada FE. Multicomponent T2* mapping of
knee cartilage: technical feasibility ex vivo. Magn Reson Med.
2010;64(5):1426-31. doi:10.1002/mrm.22450