Dima Saied Bishara1, Lexiaozi Fan1, Zhitao Li1, Daniel Lee2, and Daniel Kim1
1Department of Radiology, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States, 2Division of Cardiology, Internal Medicine, Northwestern University Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago, IL, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Artifacts, Data Processing, Visualization
Motivation: Radial k-space sampling is preferred over cartesian k-space sampling due to its many advantages. One major drawback of radial k-space is the streaking artifacts that arise from the non-linear gradients from the peripheral of FOV.
Goal(s): The goal of this study is to reduce streaky artifacts.
Approach: We developed an algorithm that aims to detect the streaky coils based on post-processing of the coils’ images and then remove these streaky coils for a cleaner image.
Results: Our results show that the proposed method precisely predicts streaky coils and improves the appearance of streaky artifacts in the CS reconstruction after removing the selected coils.
Impact: Radial k-space
sampling is improved using our new precise streaky coils detection algorithm
that effectively removes them to produce a clean image with no streaky
artifacts. An unmet need in the radial k-space sampling in the MRI field in
general.
Introduction
Radial k-space
sampling provides many advantages over Cartesian k-space sampling, including more
benign aliasing artifacts, better motion properties, and potentially higher
signal-to-noise ratio when under-sampled. One disadvantage of radial sampling
is streaky artifacts resulting from a mismatch in spatial encoding due to non-linear
magnetic field gradients near the periphery and chemical shift of fat. Xue et
al. proposed an image-based post-processing approach to detect streaky coils[1],
but its efficacy has not been evaluated for cardiac MRI. We proposed a k-space-based post-processing approach to detecting streaky coils and compared its
efficacy with the method proposed by Xue et al. for first-pass cardiac
perfusion MRI. Methods
Human
Subjects and Pulse Sequence: We retrospectively identified cardiac perfusion data from 11 patients (4
females; mean age = 58.3 ± 13.6 years). The relevant image parameters included:
FOV = 384x384 mm2, slice thickness = 8 mm, acquisition matrix =
192x192, readout duration = 109, flip angle = 15°, receiver
bandwidth = 744 Hz/pixel, 42 radial spokes per frame, 100 repetitions, number
of slices ranged from 5 to 6, and acceleration factor = 4.6. In total, this
study entailed 1683 coil-by-coil time series.
Post-Processing: As the pre-processing step, we combined
7 timeframes (frames 21 to 27 representing post-gadolinium) to achieve 294, which
is nearly 301 – the Nyquist condition for radial k-space sampling with 192 kx
points, and performed coil-by-coil non-uniform fast Fourier transform (NUFFT). In
step one, we performed FFT to derive coil-by-coil k-space representing the
Nyquist condition. In step two, we performed thresholding to create a binary
mask of k-space, in order to capture streaking artifacts distributed across
k-space as shown. We performed a preliminary experiment on several training
data to empirically derive 0.02 of the maximal k-space value as the optimal cut
point. We created a bandpass filter to remove the central lobe of k-space (DC
component) that is unrelated to streaks and to suppress the peripheral of
k-space since the number of spokes (294) is slightly below Nyquist condition. To
detect streaky coils, we computed the following: (a) we calculated the “mass” (i.e.,
area) of the streaking artifacts reflected in k-space as a fraction of total
k-space dimension; we empirically defined percent area of 9.7% based on
training data; (b) we calculated the centroid of the k-space mask to ensure
that it is away from the center of k-space space and used the Euclidean
distance of 9 (equal to the inner radius of the annulus filter). Streaky coil
is defined as Euclidean distance > 9 or perfect area > 9.7%.
Comparison
Method: We used the
method developed by Xue et al. as reference. We used a 64-point Hanning window,
computed $$$Rstreak = \frac{mean(abs(Iorig-Iref))}{mean(Iref)}$$$, where Iorig is unprocessed reconstruction and Iref
is Hanning windowed reconstruction and adjusted
the threshold for Rstreak to 4.5 based on training data.
Accuracy
Calculation: We used one
human expert as reference for detecting streaky coils. We calculated the
sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy for both methods.
Image
reconstruction: To further
evaluate the benefit of removing streaking artifacts, we performed iterative Golden-angle Radial Sparse Parallel Imaging (GRASP)[2]
implemented in MATLAB, for all coils and after removal of streaky coils
by our method and the method by Xue et al.Results
As summarized
in Table 1, the sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy of our method were
superior to that of Xue et al for predicting N=390 streaky coils out of 1683 coils. Figure 2 compares representative
cardiac perfusion GRASP reconstructed images using all coils and after removing
streaky coils by our method and by Xue’s method. As shown, our method produced
less streaky artifacts compared with all coils and the method by Xue et al. Discussion and Conclusion
Our k-space
based post-processing approach detects streaky coils more accurately than the
method proposed by Xue et al. Future study including different types of radial
k-space data is warranted to test the generalizability of our method. Acknowledgements
The authors would like to thank funding support from the National Institutes of Health (R01HL116895, R01HL151079, R21EB030806A1, 1R01HL167148‐01A1), the American Heart Association (19IPLOI34760317, 949899), and the Radiological Society of North America (EILTC2302).References
1.
Xue Y, Yu J, Kang HS, Englander S, Rosen MA,
Song HK. Automatic coil selection for streak artifact reduction in radial MRI.
Magn Reson Med. 2012 Feb;67(2):470-6.
2.
Feng
L, Grimm R, Block KT, Chandarana H, Kim S, Xu J, Axel L, Sodickson DK, Otazo R.
Golden-angle radial sparse parallel MRI: combination of compressed sensing,
parallel imaging, and golden-angle radial sampling for fast and flexible
dynamic volumetric MRI. Magn Reson Med. 2014 Sep;72(3):707-17.