Chuyu Liu1, Rui Guo1, Zhongsen Li1, and Xiaolei Song1
1Center for Biomedical Imaging Research, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: CEST / APT / NOE, CEST & MT
Motivation: Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) acceleration requires robust contrast recovery from under-sampled k-space data.
Goal(s): To achieve accelerated CEST-MRI with well-preserved contrast among different tissue types.
Approach: Herein we proposed a reconstruction method that iteratively decomposed both K-space and Image domains into Low-rank plus Sparse components, termed as KILS.
Results: Retrospective experiments from the healthy adults and brain tumor patients indicated that KILS could achieve an 8X acceleration factor, with well-preserved contrast among different tissue types. Experiments conducted on human liver at 3T and rat brain at 9.4T demonstrated that KILS exhibited good general applicability, suggesting its potential clinical utility.
Impact: We developed KILS, which utilizes an iterative low-rank plus sparse matrix
decomposition in both k-space and image
domains for robust CEST
contrast recovery from under-sampled k-space data and holds significant
potential.
1. Introduction
Chemical
Exchange Saturation Transfer (CEST) MRI is a promising molecular imaging
technique that allows for in vivo metabolic contrast by detecting proton
exchange effects between water and solute pools (1). However, traditional
CEST MRI methods suffer from long scan times, low signal-to-noise ratio (SNR),
and asymmetrical signal variations, posing challenges for fast and robust image
acquisition and reconstruction.
Based on the feasibility demonstrated by Otazo et al. in various dynamic
MRI scenarios (2), the low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition (L+S) technique
can be potentially applied in CEST MRI (3). Herein we proposed a
reconstruction method that iteratively decomposed both K-space and Image
domains into Low-rank plus Sparse
components, termed as KILS.2. Methods
2.1 KILS: L+S decomposition in K-I domain
The objective function with a simultaneous matrix decomposition approach
in both image domain and k-space is:
$$min\left\|L_I\right\|_*+\lambda_1\left\|TS_I\right\|_1+\lambda_2\left\|L_K\right\|_*+\lambda_3\left\|TS_K\right\|_1$$
$$s.t.\ UE\left(L_I+S_I\right)=d$$
$$E\left(L_I+S_I\right)=L_K+S_K$$
where LI, SI, LK
and SK are low-rank and sparse components in image domain and k-space,
respectively. T is a sparse transformation of S. E is an encoding operator consisting
of sensitivity encoding and Fourior Transform, U is the under-sampling mask in
k-space, and d is the acquired
data in k-space. According to the proximal gradient method, the final expressions for the four components
in the kth
iteration are as follows:
$$L_I^{\left(k\right)}={\rm SVT}_{\lambda_{L_I}}\left\{L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}-t_I^{\left(k\right)}\left(UE\right)^\ast\left[UE\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-d\right]-t_I^{\left(k\right)}E^\ast\left[E\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-\left(L_K^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_K^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)\right]\right\}$$
$$S_I^{\left(k\right)}=T^{-1}\Lambda_{\lambda_{S_I}}\left\{T\left[S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}-t_I^{\left(k\right)}\left(UE\right)^\ast\left(UE\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-d\right)-t_I^{\left(k\right)}E^\ast\left(E\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-\left(L_K^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_K^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)\right)\right]\right\}$$
$$L_K^{\left(k\right)}={\rm SVT}_{\lambda_{L_K}}\left\{L_K^{\left(k-1\right)}-t_K^{\left(k\right)}\left[E\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-\left(L_K^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_K^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)\right]\right\}$$
$$S_K^{\left(k\right)}=T^{-1}\Lambda_{\lambda_{S_I}}\left\{T\left[S_K^{\left(k-1\right)}-t_K^{\left(k\right)}\left(E\left(L_I^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_I^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)-\left(L_K^{\left(k-1\right)}+S_K^{\left(k-1\right)}\right)\right)\right]\right\}$$
Equations above are presented in Table 1.
2.2
CEST MRI experiments
Human data were acquired at a 3T scanner (Ingenia, Philips Healthcare)
using a
3D multi-shot TSE CEST sequence with 31 saturation offsets. The
brain data encompassed 11 healthy adults with voxel size of
1.8×1.8×3.3 mm3 and 15 brain tumor patients with voxel size of
2×2×6 mm3. Moreover, A stroke rat
was scanned with a 2D CEST RARE sequence and voxel size of 0.27×0.33×1.2 mm3
and a free-breathing abdominal CEST sequence with water pre-saturation and
respiratory gating was performed, involving scanning a single healthy subject
with 2D single-shot TSE readout, voxel size of 1.7×1.7 mm2 and slice thickness of 4 mm.
2.3 Image reconstruction
Image reconstruction was carried out using MATLAB 2021b. The
reconstruction hyper-parameters, $$$\lambda_{L_I}$$$, $$$\lambda_{S_I}$$$, $$$\lambda_{L_K}$$$ and $$$\lambda_{S_K}$$$ were selected by grid search with minimum MSE.3. Results
3.1 Human
brain results
Figure
1 focuses on quantitative image-quality assessment. It is evident that KILS
outperformed other methods in reconstructing saturation images, displaying
minimal errors (Figure 1(A-B)). The statistical analysis further confirmed the
superior reconstruction accuracy of KILS, as indicated by the higher PSNR and
lower MSE values (Figure 1(C-D), p<0.01).
CEST
contrast maps from a brain tumor patient with AFs varying from 2 to 8, are depicted in Figure
2. The lesion region exhibited hyper-intense amide signals and lower-intense
NOE signals compared to normal brain tissue. KILS improved the visualization of
contrast enhancement in
the tumor region. At AF=8, KILS could maintain the contrast
between different tissue types, demonstrating
the robustness of KILS on CEST contrast enhancement.
Figure
3 displays each component from a healthy adult and a brain tumor patient, which
indicates the
sparse component in the
L+S method does not capture
the disparities of z-spectra from different voxels while the contrast maps of LK
present the
basis intensity of CEST contrast with rich anatomical texture. Specifically, the brain tumor region displays a higher signal
intensity in both MTRasym
and LDamide maps, and a lower signal intensity in the LDNOE map. Results from ablation
experiments further support the assumption regarding the explanation of the
KILS model.
3.2 Other
applications
We applied the KILS method to human liver and rat brain CEST MRI. Figure
4 illustrates the liver images and
rat brain images with MTRasym maps obtained from L+S, KILS, k-t sparse and fully sampled
data. Notably, KILS demonstrated the minimum reconstruction error both in saturation images and the MTRasym
map.4. Dicussion and conclusion
In this study, we introduced
a novel iterative
low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition technique in
the
K-I domain, referred to as KILS.
This method
enabled simultaneous L+S decomposition in both k-space and image domains,
facilitating the reconstruction of
saturation images with robust CEST contrast from under-sampled k-space data (up
to 8X). Results demonstrated that KILS consistently produced faithful
image reconstructions based on various evaluation metrics and robust contrast
maps after post-processing. Additionally, an ablation experiment was conducted, confirming
that
KILS effectively captures the similarity and
disparity of z-spectra in k-space. KILS is expected to
accelerate clinical CEST protocols,
reconstruct robust CEST contrast maps, and expand
the
clinical utilities of CEST MRI. Nevertheless, further investigations are
necessary
to validate the
effectiveness of KILS.Acknowledgements
This work is partially supported by National Key R&D Program of China 2022YFC3602500, 2022YFC3602503 and National Natural Science Foundation of China (NSFC) (Nos. 82071914).References
1. van Zijl
PCM, Lam WW, Xu J, Knutsson L, Stanisz GJ. Magnetization Transfer Contrast and
Chemical Exchange Saturation Transfer MRI. Features and analysis of the
field-dependent saturation spectrum. Neuroimage.
Mar 2018;168:222-241. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.04.045
2. Otazo R,
Candes E, Sodickson DK. Low-rank plus sparse matrix decomposition for
accelerated dynamic MRI with separation of background and dynamic components. Magn Reson Med. Mar 2015;73(3):1125-36.
doi:10.1002/mrm.25240
3. Kwiatkowski G, Kozerke S. Accelerating
CEST MRI in the mouse brain at 9.4 T by exploiting sparsity in the Z-spectrum
domain. NMR Biomed. Sep
2020;33(9):e4360. doi:10.1002/nbm.4360