Keywords: Functional Connectivity, Alzheimer's Disease, Preclinical AD
Motivation: The significance of changes in functional connectivity (FC) measures involving white matter (WM) at preclinical stages of Alzheimer’s disease (AD) remains unclear.
Goal(s): Our goal was to reveal alterations in correlations in BOLD signals between WM and gray matter (GM) in the AD continuum, focusing on preclinical AD.
Approach: We used a novel bipartite graph model to evaluate network properties at multi-scales and compared preclinical AD, AD subjects with controls.
Results: We found declines in local specific WM-GM FC and WM FC density, without a manifest decline in global efficiency of WM-involved functional networks in the preclinical AD group.
Impact: Our observation of a decline in local WM-GM FC and WM FC density but an intact global efficiency of functional networks in preclinical AD may help explain why cognition remains normal despite the presence of pathology during the preclinical stage.
This work was supported by NIH grant RF1MH123201 (Gore and Landman), R01NS113832 (Gore), Vanderbilt Discovery Grant FF600670 (Gao), R01NS129855 (Ding), K01EB032898 (Schilling), T32EB001628 (Gore) and grant of Vanderbilt Institute for Clinical and Translational Research UL1TR0002243.
1 Scheltens, P. et al. Alzheimer's disease. The Lancet 397, 1577-1590 (2021).
2 Jack Jr, C. R. et al. NIA-AA research framework: toward a biological definition of Alzheimer's disease. Alzheimer's & Dementia 14, 535-562 (2018).
3 Sheline, Y. I. & Raichle, M. E. Resting state functional connectivity in preclinical Alzheimer’s disease. Biological psychiatry 74, 340-347 (2013).
4 Yu, M., Sporns, O. & Saykin, A. J. The human connectome in Alzheimer disease—relationship to biomarkers and genetics. Nature Reviews Neurology 17, 545-563 (2021).
5 Gao, Y. et al. Functional connectivity of white matter as a biomarker of cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease. Plos one 15, e0240513 (2020).
6 Gore, J. C. et al. Functional MRI and resting state connectivity in white matter-a mini-review. Magnetic resonance imaging 63, 1-11 (2019).
7 Gao, Y. et al. Functional alterations in bipartite network of white and grey matters during aging. NeuroImage 278, 120277 (2023).
8 Vos, S. J. et al. Preclinical Alzheimer's disease and its outcome: a longitudinal cohort study. The Lancet Neurology 12, 957-965 (2013).
9 Mishra, S. et al. AV-1451 PET imaging of tau pathology in preclinical Alzheimer disease: defining a summary measure. Neuroimage 161, 171-178 (2017).
10 Vlassenko, A. G. et al. Imaging and cerebrospinal fluid biomarkers in early preclinical Alzheimer disease. Annals of neurology 80, 379-387 (2016).
11 Sabri, O. et al. Florbetaben PET imaging to detect amyloid beta plaques in Alzheimer's disease: phase 3 study. Alzheimer's & dementia 11, 964-974 (2015).
12 Gao, Y. et al. in Medical Imaging 2023: Image Processing. 155-161 (SPIE).
13 Mori, S. et al. Stereotaxic white matter atlas based on diffusion tensor imaging in an ICBM template. Neuroimage 40, 570-582 (2008).
14 Schaefer, A. et al. Local-global parcellation of the human cerebral cortex from intrinsic functional connectivity MRI. Cerebral cortex 28, 3095-3114 (2018).
Table 1. Characteristics of the Study Cohort.
Figure 1. Schematic diagram of the project design. (A) Projection from a WM-GM rsFC weighted bipartite graph to a WM-mediated GM-GM weighted graph. (B) Subjects recruited in the study, including CN (negative Aβ-related biomarker (A-) and negative cognitive decline (C-)), preclinical AD (positive A (A+) and C-) and AD (A+ and C+).
Figure 2. Significant differences in rsFC between subjects with preclinical AD and CN subjects and between patients with AD and CN subjects (p<0.01, uncorrected). Each colored node represents a GM parcel assigned to a specific functional network and each gray node represents a WM bundle. Curves connecting between pairs of parcels indicate mean FC difference between groups where blue color indicates lower FC in preclinical AD or AD compared to the control group and red is the reverse.
Figure 3. Differences in mean FCD between subjects with preclinical AD and CN subjects (inner circle) and between patients with AD and CN subjects (outer circle). Blue and red bars indicate negative and positive FCD differences, respectively. An asterisk on the bar indicates p < 0.05, and a diamond on the bar represents p < 0.1 (both uncorrected).
Figure 4. Alterations in global efficiency of functional network. Variations of global efficiencies of projected networks of bipartite WM-GM FC connection were shown for the whole brain network and 17 sub-networks (plots corresponding to significant differences (p<0.05) between patients with AD and CN subjects were marked in bold). Cognitive score, the MMSE (labeled as blue), and biomarkers, the CSF Aβ and the AV45 SUVR values (marked as gray) were also plotted in the figure.