Keywords: High-Field MRI, Brain, spiral imaging, field monitoring
Motivation: There has been an increasing interest to pursue spiral imaging at ultrahigh field owing to its improved sampling efficiency.
Goal(s): Our goal was to demonstrate the feasibility of spiral imaging in humans at 10.5 Tesla.
Approach: Highly-accelerated single-shot 2D spiral GRE images were collected using 128 receive channels and a sequence developed in an open source environment. Dynamic field changes associated with the spiral readout gradients were measured in a separate session using 16 NMR probes.
Results: Quality T2*-weighted single-shot spiral imaging of the human brain was achieved by simultaneous corrections of static off-resonances and dynamic field changes through image reconstruction.
Impact: The demonstrated feasibility of spiral imaging in humans at 10.5 Tesla may shed light on how best to implement spiral imaging at ultrahigh field, paving the way for many applications that would benefit from a spiral readout.
The authors would like to thank Cameron Cushing and Paul Weavers from Skope MRT for their indispensable contributions. This work was supported in part by NIH grants NIBIB P41 EB027061, U01 EB025144 and S10 RR029672.
1. Feizollah, S. and C.L. Tardif, High-resolution diffusion-weighted imaging at 7 Tesla: Single-shot readout trajectories and their impact on signal-to-noise ratio, spatial resolution and accuracy. Neuroimage, 2023. 274.
2. Kasper, L., et al., Rapid anatomical brain imaging using spiral acquisition and an expanded signal model. Neuroimage, 2018. 168: p. 88-100.
3. Vannesjo, S.J., et al., Retrospective correction of physiological field fluctuations in high-field brain MRI using concurrent field monitoring. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2015. 73(5): p. 1833-1843.
4. Layton, K.J., et al., Pulseq: A rapid and hardware-independent pulse sequence prototyping framework. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2017. 77(4): p. 1544-1552.
5. Lagore, R., et al. 128-channel brain imaging array with improved acceleration at 10.5 Tesla. in Proceedings of the Annual Meeting of ISMRM. 2023.
6. Lustig, M., S.J. Kim, and J.M. Pauly, A fast method for designing time-optimal gradient waveforms for arbitrary k-space trajectories. IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, 2008. 27(6): p. 866-873.
7. Dietrich, B.E., et al., A Field Camera for MR Sequence Monitoring and System Analysis. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2016. 75(4): p. 1831-1840.
8. De Zanche, N., C. Barmet, J.A. Nordmeyer-Massner, and K.P. Pruessmann, NMR probes for measuring magnetic fields and field dynamics in MR systems. Magn Reson Med, 2008. 60(1): p. 176-86.
9. Wilm, B.J., C. Barmet, M. Pavan, and K.P. Pruessmann, Higher Order Reconstruction for MRI in the Presence of Spatiotemporal Field Perturbations. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2011. 65(6): p. 1690-1701.
10. Kasper, L., et al., Matched-filter acquisition for BOLD fMRI. Neuroimage, 2014. 100: p. 145-160.
11. Pruessmann, K.P., M. Weiger, P. Börnert, and P. Boesiger, Advances in sensitivity encoding with arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2001. 46(4): p. 638-651.
12. Pruessmann, K.P., M. Weiger, M.B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger, SENSE: Sensitivity encoding for fast MRI. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 1999. 42(5): p. 952-962.
Fig. 1. Experimental setup. Human image data were collected on a 10.5 Tesla (10.5T) Siemens Magnetom Dotplus scanner (left) using a custom 16-channel transmit 128-channel receive (16Tx/128Rx) RF coil (middle). The dynamic field monitoring was conducted in a separate session using a scaffold (right) in which 16 field probes were placed across 3D space to characterize the dynamic field changes associated with the spiral image readout.
Fig. 3. Measured vs nominal k-space trajectory for the spiral image readout. The 2D spiral trajectory (left) for a 21x21 cm2 FOV, a 1-mm resolution and a 5-fold under-sampling rate was accomplished by designing time-optimal gradient waveforms. The measured k-space trajectory appeared to deviate from the nominal one, especially when approaching the outermost of the k-space (right).
Fig. 4. Measured dynamic field changes for zero-th (left) and second (right) order terms associated with the spiral image readout. Even with a readout as short as 23 ms, non-negligible phase accrual due to higher order dynamic field changes was observed.
Fig. 5. Single-shot 2D spiral T2*w brain imaging at 10.5T. Data were obtained with TE/TR = 16/1000 ms and reconstructed using conjugate-gradient SENSE. The reconstruction with nominal k-space trajectory and without static off-resonance (dB0) correction (left) presented strong artifacts. Incorporating dB0 correction (middle) largely improved the image quality but still exhibited some image artifacts (e.g., as indicated by the yellow circle). The artifacts were effectively removed by also addressing dynamic field changes through image reconstruction (right).