Keywords: Diffusion Acquisition, Shims, Diffusion
Motivation: High-resolution diffusion MRI in high-gradient head-only systems, which is promising for advancing our understanding of human brain microstructure, is still prone to distortion from B0 field inhomogeneity.
Goal(s): To reduce B0 field inhomogeneity for improved image quality of high-resolution diffusion MRI.
Approach: Dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming of 0th and 1st order was implemented in diffusion MRI.
Results: Preliminary results showed reduced image shift and distortion of slices at different locations in axial b=0 s/mm2 echo planar image with 1-mm isotropic resolution with dynamic slice-dependent B0 shimming, demonstrating the potential of high image quality of high-resolution diffusion MRI for brain microstructure imaging.
Impact: Neuroimaging scientists and MR physicists, who use high-resolution diffusion MRI for studying brain circuits, connectivity, and microstructure, can benefit from improved image quality with reduced distortion from dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming technique in high-performance gradient MRI systems.
1. Foo TKF, Tan ET, Vermilyea ME, et al. Highly efficient head-only magnetic field insert gradient coil for achieving simultaneous high gradient amplitude and slew rate at 3.0T (MAGNUS) for brain microstructure imaging. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2020;83(6):2356-2369. doi:10.1002/mrm.28087
2. Feinberg D, Dietz P, Liu C, et al. Design and Development of a Next-Generation 7T human brain scanner with high-performance gradient coil and dense RF arrays. In: ISMRM 2021. Accessed November 3, 2023. https://archive.ismrm.org/2021/0562.html
3. Huang SY, Witzel T, Keil B, et al. Connectome 2.0: Developing the next-generation ultra-high gradient strength human MRI scanner for bridging studies of the micro-, meso- and macro-connectome. Neuroimage. 2021;243:118530. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118530
4. Zhu A, Shih R, Huang RY, et al. Revealing tumor microstructure with oscillating diffusion encoding MRI in pre-surgical and post-treatment glioma patients. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(5):1789-1801. doi:10.1002/mrm.29758
5. Steele CJ, Anwander A, Bazin PL, et al. Human Cerebellar Sub-millimeter Diffusion Imaging Reveals the Motor and Non-motor Topography of the Dentate Nucleus. Cereb Cortex. 2017;27(9):4537-4548. doi:10.1093/cercor/bhw258
6. Su JH, Choi EY, Tourdias T, et al. Improved Vim targeting for focused ultrasound ablation treatment of essential tremor: A probabilistic and patient‐specific approach. Hum Brain Mapp. 2020;41(17):4769-4788. doi:10.1002/hbm.25157
7. Tax C, Rudrapatna U, Mueller L, Jones D. In: Characterizing Diffusion of Myelin Water in the Living Human Brain Using Ultra-Strong Gradients and Spiral Readout. ; 2019:1115. Accessed November 2, 2023. https://cds.ismrm.org/protected/19MPresentations/abstracts/1115.html
8. Lee SK, Tan ET, Govenkar A, Hancu I. Dynamic slice-dependent shim and center frequency update in 3 T breast diffusion weighted imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2014;71(5):1813-1818. doi:10.1002/mrm.24824
9. Stocker D, Manoliu A, Becker AS, et al. Image Quality and Geometric Distortion of Modern Diffusion-Weighted Imaging Sequences in Magnetic Resonance Imaging of the Prostate. Invest Radiol. 2018;53(4):200-206. doi:10.1097/RLI.0000000000000429
10. McElroy S, Winfield JM, Westerland O, et al. Integrated slice-specific dynamic shimming for whole-body diffusion-weighted MR imaging at 1.5 T. MAGMA. 2021;34(4):513-521. doi:10.1007/s10334-020-00898-6
11. Gatidis S, Graf H, Weiß J, et al. Diffusion-weighted echo planar MR imaging of the neck at 3 T using integrated shimming: comparison of MR sequence techniques for reducing artifacts caused by magnetic-field inhomogeneities. MAGMA. 2017;30(1):57-63. doi:10.1007/s10334-016-0582-z
Table 1. Imaging parameters of B0 field mapping and diffusion MRI acquisitions in MAGNUS 3T. OGSE: oscillating gradient spin echo.
Figure 1. B0 field maps of two representative slices in different slice locations using (A) static shimming for the entire volume; (B) dynamic slice-by-slice 0th order B0 shimming by adjusting center frequency for each slice; (C) dynamic slice-by-slice 0th and 1st order B0 shimming. Slice-dependent in-plane linear gradient field were observed in both X direction and Y direction (D). Mean of ΔB0 was reduced to 0 Hz. The maximum standard deviation across all slices was reduced from 40.6 Hz to 13.3 Hz by applying dynamic shimming (E).
Figure 2. B0 field maps of two representative slices in the two subjects using (A) static shimming for the entire volume; (B) dynamic slice-by-slice 0th order B0 shimming by adjusting center frequency for each slice; (C) dynamic slice-by-slice 0th and 1st order B0 shimming. Slice-dependent in-plane linear gradient field were observed in both X and Y direction (D). Mean of ΔB0 was reduced to 0 Hz. The maximum standard deviations across all slices were reduced from 53.9 Hz (Subject #1) and 58.4 Hz (Subject #2) to 16.8 Hz (Subject #1) and 21.6Hz (Subject #2) by applying dynamic shimming (E).
Figure 3. Two representative slices of 1-mm isotropic resolution b=0 s/mm2 images in the diffusion acquisitions of the mini-ACR phantom, using (A) static shimming for the entire volume and (B) dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming of 0th order (center frequency) and 1st order gradient. T2 FSE anatomical images (C) are shown as reference. Dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming reduces both image shift (pointed by red arrow) and distortion (length measurement as pointed by the yellow lines) in both slices.
Figure 4. Two representative slices of 1-mm isotropic resolution b=0 s/mm2 images in the diffusion acquisitions of a healthy subject’s brain, using (A) static shimming for the entire volume and (B) dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming of 0th order (center frequency) and 1st order gradient. T2 FSE anatomical images (C) are shown as reference. Dynamic slice-by-slice B0 shimming reduces image distortions in both slices (pointed by red arrows).