Leonardo A Rivera Rivera1, Tomas Vikner1,2, Laura Eisenmenger1, Sterling C Johnson1, and Kevin M Johnson1
1University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, United States, 2Umeå University, Umeå, Sweden
Synopsis
Keywords: Alzheimer's Disease, Alzheimer's Disease
Motivation: Cardiac driven CSF flow might play an important role in brain metabolite waste clearance. Comorbid cerebrovascular disease is common in Alzheimer’s disease and could lead to impaired CSF flow motion and waste clearance.
Goal(s): We aimed to characterize the associations between blood and CSF flow dynamics during preclinical AD.
Approach: Cognitively unimpaired participants underwent multi-delay (MD) ASL, and high- and low-velocity encoded 4D-Flow for the assessment of blood and CSF flow. AD pathology including amyloid and tau were determined from [11C]-PiB and [18F]-MK6240 PET.
Results: Blood flow pulsatility and CSF flow velocities were positively correlated and significantly higher in AD biomarker positive.
Impact: This work helps elucidate the coupling
between blood and CSF flow during preclinical Alzheimer’s disease (AD), improving
our understanding of neurofluids dynamics in AD. This information might help study
brain clearance pathways which are hypothesized to be impaired in AD.
Introduction:
Animal studies indicate alterations in
cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) flow may lead to impaired brain metabolite waste
clearance.1 Brain clearance is hypothesized to be driven by CSF flow
motion induced from arterial pulsations, respiration, and functional hyperemia.
Failure in brain waste clearance has been implicated in Alzheimer’s disease (AD)
the most common cause of dementia.2 AD is characterized by abnormal
levels of amyloid and tau protein in the brain; however, comorbid
cerebrovascular vascular disease (CVD) is frequent and might contribute to
impaired brain clearance and CSF flow motion in AD.3 To study CVD
and CSF, assessment of cerebral blood and CSF flow dynamics is feasible using
arterial spin labeling (ASL) and phase contrast (PC) MRI. In this work, we
examined the relationship between cerebral blood flow (CBF) (micro- and
macro-vascular), and CSF flow using multi-delay (MD) ASL, and high- and low-velocity
encoded 4D-flow MRI in a group of cognitively unimpaired participants with AD biomarkers
including amyloid from [11C]-PiB and tau from [18F]-MK-6240 PET.Methods:
Data from 49 cognitively unimpaired
participants (age=71±7y, 32F) from the Wisconsin Registry for Alzheimer’s
Prevention4 were included. From these, 45 had AD biomarkers (n=27
amyloid and tau negative (A-T-), n=9 A+T- and n=9 A+T+). MRI: Three-dimensional
PC MRI data with 3-directional velocity encoding were acquired on a 3.0T
clinical MRI system (Signa Premier, GE Healthcare) using a 48-channel head coil
(GE Healthcare). CSF flow scan parameters included: Venc=5cm/s, imaging volume =24x24x4cm3,
isotropic resolution =1mm3, TR/TE=12.1/6.9ms and scan time ~8min. Blood
flow scan parameters included: Venc=80cm/s, imaging volume =22x22x16cm3,
isotropic resolution =0.7mm3, TR/TE=7.8/2.7ms and scan time ~5.6min.
PC data were cardiac-gated using a photoplethysmogram and images reconstructed
to 20 cardiac phases. MD-ASL data were collected with imaging volume =
24x24x16cm3, reconstructed 1.875x1.875mm2 in-plane
resolution, 4mm slice thickness, TR/TE=6955/53ms, scan time =5min, and three
post labeling delays (1.0, 1.8, 2.7s) to provide a measure of perfusion
corrected for arrival time. CSF flow data were processed using GTFlow
(GyroTools). Flow and velocity profiles were extracted at the level of the
cerebral aqueduct (CA). Blood flow data were processed using a semi-automated
MATLAB (MathWorks) tool.5 Derived hemodynamic parameters included
blood flow pulsatile range, and pulsatility index (PI) in vessel segments
including the internal carotid arteries (ICAs), basilar artery (BA), middle
cerebral arteries (MCAs) and superior sagittal sinus. Total CBF from 4D-flow
was defined as the summation of ICAs and BA flow. Arterial transit-time corrected CBF (tcCBF)
maps were generated from MD-ASL data and co-registered to T1 images using
SPM12. Grey matter (GM) and CSF probability maps were extracted from T1 images
using CAT12.6 GM maps were binarized using a threshold of 0.75 and
applied to tcCBF images to extract GM perfusion.7 PET:
Amyloid (A) was assessed using [11C]-PiB. A+ was determined using a previously
established global DVR threshold >1.19.8 Tau (T) was assessed
using [18F]-MK6240. T+ was determined using a previously established entorhinal
cortex SUVR threshold >1.27.9 Linear regressions were used to
study the associations between blood flow, perfusion, and CSF flow markers. Group
differences were assessed using Student's t-test (P<0.05 significance).Results:
A+T+ participants showed significantly
higher CSF flow velocities compared to A+T- (P=0.024) and A-T- (P=0.006)
(Figure 1). ICAs blood pulsatile range was significantly higher in A+T+
compared to A-T- (P=0.007) (Figure 2). CSF flow velocities and
range were positively correlated with age (R2=0.20, P=0.001; R2=0.12,
P=0.014) and total intracranial CSF volume (R2=0.15, P=0.007; R2=0.11,
P=0.019) (Figure 3). CSF flow range and maximum flow were positively correlated
with ICAs blood pulsatile range (R2=0.11, P=0.019; R2=0.13,
P=0.011) (Figure 4). Total CBF and venous blood flow from 4D-flow were
positively correlated with GM perfusion from MD-ASL (R2=0.56,
P<0.001; R2=0.44, P<0.001) (Figure 5). MCA PI was negatively
correlated with GM perfusion (R2=0.15, P=0.011).Discussion and Conclusions:
Significant blood and CSF flow changes were
observed in cognitively unimpaired AD biomarker positive participants including
faster CA CSF flow velocities and blood flow pulsations in A+T+. Older age and
larger intracranial CSF volume were associated with faster CA CSF flow. Blood
flow pulsations and CSF flow dynamics were significantly correlated indicating neurofluid
cardiac coupling. Together these observations suggest vascular driven and age related
CSF flow changes in preclinical AD; however, CA is likely distant from where
waste clearance presumably occurs. To further study brain clearance pathways, characterization
of CSF flow in sub-arachnoid and perivascular spaces is needed. Finally, larger
correlation coefficients were measured for CBF from 4D-flow and GM perfusion
from MD-ASL compared to previous studies that used single delay ASL methods,
likely due to increased robustness of MD approaches to late arterial filling.10Acknowledgements
We gratefully acknowledge research support from GE Healthcare, and
funding support from the Alzheimer’s Association (AARFD-20-678095) and from NIH
grants R01AG075788, R21AG077337, R01AG021155, P30AG062715, and UL1TR002373.References
1. Nedergaard M, Goldman SA. Glymphatic failure as a final common
pathway to dementia. Science. 2020 Oct 2;370(6512):50-56. Doi:
10.1126/science.abb8739. PMID: 33004510; PMCID: PMC8186542.
2. Tarasoff-Conway JM, Carare RO, Osorio RS, et al.
Clearance systems in the brain-implications for Alzheimer disease. Nat Rev
Neurol. 2015 Aug;11(8):457-70. Doi:
10.1038/nrneurol.2015.119. Epub 2015 Jul 21. Erratum in: Nat Rev Neurol. 2016 Apr;12(4):248. PMID: 26195256; PMCID: PMC4694579.
3. Frank B, Ally M, Tripodis Y, et al. Trajectories of Cognitive
Decline in Brain Donors With Autopsy-Confirmed Alzheimer Disease and
Cerebrovascular Disease. Neurology. 2022 Jun 14;98(24):e2454-e2464. Doi:
10.1212/WNL.0000000000200304. Epub 2022 Apr 20. Erratum in: Neurology. 2023 Jan
24;: PMID: 35444054; PMCID: PMC9231841.
4. Johnson SC, Koscik RL, Jonaitis EM, et al. The Wisconsin
Registry for Alzheimer’s Prevention: A review of findings and current
directions. Alzheimers Dement (Amst). 2017 Dec 8;10:130-142. Doi: 10.1016/j.dadm.2017.11.007.
PMID: 29322089; PMCID: PMC5755749.
5. Roberts GS, Hoffman CA, Rivera-Rivera LA, et al. Automated
hemodynamic assessment for cranial 4D flow MRI. Magn Reson Imaging. 2023
Apr;97:46-55. Doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2022.12.016. Epub 2022 Dec 26. PMID: 36581214;
PMCID: PMC9892280.
6. Gaser C, Dahnke R, Thompson PM, et al. CAT – A Computational Anatomy Toolbox for the Analysis of
Structural MRI Data. bioRxiv 2022.06.11.495736; doi: https://doi.org/10.1101/2022.06.11.495736.
7. Chappell MA, McConnell FAK, Golay X, et al. Partial volume
correction in arterial spin labeling perfusion MRI: A method to disentangle
anatomy from physiology or an analysis step too far? Neuroimage. 2021 Sep;238:118236.
Doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118236. Epub 2021 Jun 4. PMID: 34091034.
8. Racine AM, Clark LR, Berman SE, et al. Associations between
Performance on an Abbreviated CogState Battery, Other Measures of Cognitive
Function, and Biomarkers in People at Risk for Alzheimer’s Disease. J
Alzheimers Dis. 2016 Oct 18;54(4):1395-1408. Doi: 10.3233/JAD-160528. PMID:
27589532; PMCID: PMC5074904.
9. Betthauser TJ, Koscik RL, Jonaitis EM, et al.
Amyloid and tau imaging biomarkers explain cognitive decline from late
middle-age. Brain. 2020 Jan 1;143(1):320-335. Doi: 10.1093/brain/awz378.
Erratum in: Brain. 2020 Mar 1;143(3):e24. PMID: 31886494; PMCID: PMC6935717.
10. Dolui S, Wang Z, Wang DJJ, et al. Comparison of non-invasive
MRI measurements of cerebral blood flow in a large multisite cohort. J Cereb
Blood Flow Metab. 2016 Jul;36(7):1244-56. Doi: 10.1177/0271678X16646124. Epub
2016 May 3. PMID: 27142868; PMCID: PMC4929707.