Keywords: Tumors (Pre-Treatment), Translational Studies, Treatment response, Survival prediction, Glioblastoma (GBM), Perfusion, Quantitative Imaging
Motivation: Quantitative measurements at baseline, prior to chemoradiation, can inform prognosis and optimal treatment strategies for patients with glioblastoma (GBM), however, such measurements using ASL are currently lacking.
Goal(s): To investigate ASL measured quantitative perfusion prior to chemoradiation for survival prediction in GBM patients.
Approach: Twenty-three newly diagnosed GBM patients were enrolled in this prospective IRB-approved study. Baseline scans with ASL and survival information were obtained.
Results: ASL measured baseline perfusion aids in survival prediction and stratification between groups with long (mean: 717 days) and short (mean: 361 days) survival in GBM.
Impact: Early and accurate survival stratification by ASL measured perfusion prior to chemoradiation treatment provides valuable opportunities for therapeutic interventions, including personalized and biologically driven radiation treatment planning and strategic discontinuation of traditional treatments for enrollment in promising clinical trials.
This work was supported by NIH/NCI grant U01CA207091. The authors would like to thank all patients for their invaluable participation in this study. The authors also thank Abey Thomas, RT(MR), Courtney Dawson, RT(MR), Michael Fulkerson, AS, LVN, and Camille Harry, for their help in human imaging, and Ben Wagner, MSEE, for his help with image database and analysis routines.
1. Hu, L.S., et al., Correlations between perfusion MR imaging cerebral blood volume, microvessel quantification, and clinical outcome using stereotactic analysis in recurrent high-grade glioma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2012. 33(1): p. 69-76.
2. Law, M., et al., Glioma grading: sensitivity, specificity, and predictive values of perfusion MR imaging and proton MR spectroscopic imaging compared with conventional MR imaging. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2003. 24(10): p. 1989-98.
3. Law, M., et al., Gliomas: predicting time to progression or survival with cerebral blood volume measurements at dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced perfusion MR imaging. Radiology, 2008. 247(2): p. 490-8.
4. Jain, R., et al., Outcome prediction in patients with glioblastoma by using imaging, clinical, and genomic biomarkers: focus on the nonenhancing component of the tumor. Radiology, 2014. 272(2): p. 484-93.
5. Qiao, X.J., et al., Arterial spin-labeling perfusion MRI stratifies progression-free survival and correlates with epidermal growth factor receptor status in glioblastoma. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol, 2015. 36(4): p. 672-7.
6. Yoo, R.E., et al., Arterial spin labeling perfusion-weighted imaging aids in prediction of molecular biomarkers and survival in glioblastomas. Eur Radiol, 2020. 30(2): p. 1202-1211.
7. Ellingson, B.M., et al., Consensus recommendations for a standardized Brain Tumor Imaging Protocol in clinical trials. Neuro Oncol, 2015. 17(9): p. 1188-98.
8. Greer, J.S., et al., Robust pCASL perfusion imaging using a 3D Cartesian acquisition with spiral profile reordering (CASPR). Magn Reson Med, 2019. 82(5): p. 1713-1724.
9. Alsop, D.C., et al., Recommended Implementation of Arterial Spin-Labeled Perfusion MRI for Clinical Applications: A Consensus of the ISMRM Perfusion Study Group and the European Consortium for ASL in Dementia. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2015. 73(1): p. 102-116.
Figure 1: Post-processing pipelines for baseline MR scans in patients with glioblastoma. (A) All structural MR images were co-registered to T1 post contrast images and manual ROIs related to tumor were drawn by an experienced neuroradiologist (M.P.) for analysis. (B) ASL post-processing pipeline included skull stripping, co-registration, cerebral blood flow (CBF) quantification and mean perfusion value extraction.
Table 1: Patient demographics including age, gender, survival, mean perfusion values within enhancing tumor (ET) ROIs and corresponding categorized groups by either survival or perfusion values. Note that two patients (P003 and p009) had higher perfusion (>30 mL/100g/min) and longer survival (>420 days) and hence are mismatched between categorized survival group and perfusion group.
Figure 2: Representative slices of two different patterns (hyper-perfusion and hypo-perfusion) for quantitative ASL CBF maps along with structural MR images. Top row: 47-year old GBM patient (P001) with hyper-perfusion and shorter overall survival of 148 days. Bottom row: 28-year old GBM patient (P012) with hypo-perfusion and longer overall survival of 797 days. ASL CBF maps were displayed with an intensity range of 0 to 100 mL/min/100g.