Keywords: Signal Modeling, Quantitative Susceptibility mapping
Motivation: Higher spatial resolution can increase the diagnosis quality of Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping (QSM) by improving the sensitivity to local field variations and minimizing partial volume effects, yet, at the cost of reduced signal-to-noise ratio (SNR).
Goal(s): Improve the SNR of high-resolution QSM data, while preserving structural properties of the tissue.
Approach: Use Marchenko-Pastur principal component analysis (MP-PCA) to denoise T2*-weighted images, and generate quantitative T2* and QSM maps with higher SNR.
Results: MP-PCA denoising was able to efficiently improve the SNR on numerical phantom and in vivo. Proof of concept is provided for healthy brain anatomy and for a patient with brain metastases.
Impact: Marchenko Pastur principal component analysis can be used to enhance the SNR of T2*-weighted images, T2* maps, and QSM maps while preserving the fine details of the tissue.
1. Eskreis-Winkler S, Zhang Y, Zhang J, et al. The clinical utility of QSM: disease diagnosis, medical management, and surgical planning. NMR in Biomedicine. 2017;30(4), e3668.
2. Langkammer C, Bredies K, Poser BA, et al. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping using 3D EPI and total generalized variation. NeuroImage. 2015;111, 622–630.
3. Dimov Av, Gupta A, Kopell BH, & Wang Y. High-resolution QSM for functional and structural depiction of subthalamic nuclei in DBS presurgical mapping. Journal of Neurosurgery. 2019;131(2), 360–367.
4. Karsa A, Punwani S, & Shmueli K. The effect of low resolution and coverage on the accuracy of susceptibility mapping. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2019;81(3), 1833–1848.
5. Wang Y, & Liu T. Quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM): Decoding MRI data for a tissue magnetic biomarker. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2015;73(1), 82–101.
6. Haacke EM, Liu S, Buch, et al. Quantitative susceptibility mapping: current status and future directions. Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2015;33(1), 1–25.
7. Doniza L, Stern N, Radunsky D, et al. Proc Intr Soc Magn Reson Med, 2023, p. 2948.
8. Does MD, Olesen, JL, Harkins, KD, et al. Evaluation of principal component analysis image denoising on multi‐exponential MRI relaxometry. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2019; mrm.27658.
9. Veraart J, Novikov DS, Christiaens D, et al. Denoising of diffusion MRI using random matrix theory. NeuroImage. 2016;142, 394–406.
10. , , et al. Mapping of magnetic resonance imaging’s transverse relaxation time at low signal-to-noise ratio using Bloch simulations and principal component analysis image denoising. NMR in Biomedicine. 2022;35(12):e4807.
11. Karsa, A, Punwani, S, Shmueli, K, et al. An optimized and highly repeatable MRI acquisition and processing pipeline for quantitative susceptibility mapping in the head-and-neck region. Magn Reson Med. 2020;84: 3206–3222.
12. Goerner FL, Clarke GD. Measuring signal-to-noise ratio in partially parallel imaging MRI. Med Phys. 2011 Sep;38(9):5049-57.
Figure 1: MP-PCA denoising of a numerical phantom. (A-B, G-H) T2*-weighted images (4th echo); (C-D, I-J) T2* maps and (E-F, K-L) QSM maps pre- and post-denoising. Simulations were done at low SNRs of 10 & 20. (M-P) Representative T2* decay curves from four simulated tubes at SNR = 10. The green line (‘+’ marker) denotes the original decay curve, the blue (‘·’ marker) denotes the original decay curve, added with noise, and the red line (‘*’ marker) denotes the denoised signal. Efficient denoising is achieved for all three data types and two SNRs without visible loss of information.
Figure 2: MP-PCA denoising of brain anatomy of a healthy subject. (A-B) T2*-weighted images (first echo), (C-D) T2* maps, (E-F) QSM maps pre- and post- denoising. Zoomed regions of interest are shown below each type of image/map (marked in orange dashed rectangles). Efficient denoising is achieved for all data types without visible loss of information.
Table 1: SNR values for T2*-weighted images, alongside quantitative T2*, and QSM values pre- and post-denoising for six ROIs, segmented using Freesurfer for a healthy volunteer. A significant 74.2 ± 0.2 % increase in SNR was achieved across all ROIs, manifested mainly by a decrease in the intra-ROI SD of values. A slight decrease in mean T2* values was observed after denoising, caused by the removal of Rayleigh distributed noise at the tail of the T2* decay curve. No trend was observed in QSM values pre- / post- denoising, indicating that no bias was introduced during the denoising process.
Figure 3: MP-PCA denoising of a patient with brain metastasis. (A-B) T2*-weighted image (first echo), (C-D) T2* maps, (E-F) QSM maps pre- and post denoising. Zoomed regions of interest are shown below each type of image / map (marked in orange dashed rectangles). Efficient denoising is achieved for all data types without visible loss of information.
Figure 4: Utility of MP-PCA denoising for decreasing QSM map artifact, caused by pulsating blood flow, and manifesting as a vertical line along the phase-encoding dimension (top to bottom). Figure presents coronal brain slices of a QSM map pre- and post- denoising in a patient with sickle cell anemia. (A) Artifacts are presented in the pre-denoised image, marked with a black arrow. (B) Post-denoising map shows a significantly attenuated artifact.