3769

An MRI-based nomogram predicts intracranial recurrence of brain metastases after surgery in lung cancer patients: A multicenter study
Baoxun Li1, Jiaji Mao1, Haojiang Li1, Junwei Chen1, Fang Xiao2, Xuewen Fang3, Ruomi Guo4, Manqiu Liang3, Xiaowen Luo4, Zhiyuan Wu5, Jianing Li1, Zhixuan Hu1, Qin Wen1, and Jun Shen1
1Sun Yat-Sen Memorial Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, 2The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Hefei, China, 3The Tenth Affiliated Hospital of Southern Medical University, Dongguan People's Hospital, Dongguan, China, 4Third Affiliated Hospital of Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China, 5Capital Medical University, Beijing, China

Synopsis

Keywords: Diagnosis/Prediction, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence

Motivation: There is currently no reliable tool to predict postoperative recurrence for patients who undergo surgery for brain metastases (BrMs).

Goal(s): This study aimed to develop and externally validate a prognostic model to predict intracranial recurrence and recurrence-free survival (RFS) for lung cancer patients receiving BrM surgery.

Approach: A combined prognostic model-based nomogram was developed by incorporating clinical and structural MRI predictors, radiomics and deep signatures extracted from MR images.

Results: The nomogram predicted accurately for RFS and intracranial recurrence prediction, both in the training and test sets .

Impact: The combined prognostic model-based nomogram can be used as a preoperative tool to predict intracranial recurrence and recurrence-free survival after surgical resection of brain metastases in lung cancer patients.

Introduction

Brain metastases (BrMs) are the most prevalent intracranial malignancy, primarily caused by lung cancer1,2. Surgery is recommended to treat a limited number of BrMs3. Nevertheless, craniotomies can lead to severe complications4. Moreover, approximately 40% of BrMs recurred intracranially after surgical removal5. Unfortunately, there is a lack of models for predicting survival in lung cancer patients undergoing BrMs surgery. Therefore, the development of a reliable prognostic model for BrM resection is vital to guide the selection of eligible patients for surgical intervention.

Methods

This study included 215 patients with 244 BrMs who underwent BrM surgical resection from five centers. They were divided into a training set of 167 patients (186 BrMs) at three centers and a test set of 48 patients (58 BrMs) from two centers. All patients underwent MRI examinations, including contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (CE-T1W) and T2-weighted (T2W) within 2 weeks before the surgery. Follow-up brain MRI scans were conducted every 3 months for the first year after BrM resection and thereafter every 6 months. Recurrence-free survival (RFS) was calculated from brain surgery to the occurrence of the first intracranial recurrence, death, or last follow-up. Radiologists evaluated ten structural MRI features for BrMs.Two radiologists manually delineated the enhanced edges on each slice of CE-T1WI using ITK-SNAP to generate the volume of interest (VOI) of BrMs. Then, the CE-T1WI-based VOIs were duplicated and aligned with the T2W images of BrMs to obtain the T2WI-based BrM VOI. After imaging normalization, 1595 radiomics features were obtained using the PyRadiomics toolkit, while, within each VOI, 3584 deep features were extracted using the MedicalNet models (https://github.com/Tencent/MedicalNet). Features with good agreement were included in the subsequent analysis. Using univariate and multivariable Cox proportional hazards regression to assess the clinical and structural MRI features associated with RFS in the training set, respectively. Radiomics features and deep features were selected using max-relevance and min-redundancy (mRMR) and least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) Cox regression, respectively. Multicollinearity analysis was performed between these features. The combined prognostic model and other ensemble models were built based on the Cox regression coefficients. The ability of the combined model to predict RFS was evaluated using the calibration curve, Harrell's concordance index (C-index), continuous net reclassification improvement (NRI), Kaplan-Meier’s (K-M) survival analysis, time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analyses, and decision curve analyses (DCA). A two-sided P < 0.05 indicates a significant difference.

Results

In clinical and structural MRI features, oligometastasis, number of BrMs, BrM boundary on CE-T1WI, and cystic BrM were independent predictors for RFS. 13 radiomics features and 10 deep features were selected as the most significant predictive features. The combined model was developed based on these features, and the nomogram is shown in Figure. 1.
The combined model achieved the highest C-index for RFS prediction in the training and test sets. Its performance was significantly superior to models except clinical + structural MRI + deep signature model and clinical + structural MRI + radiomics signature model both in the training and test sets (P < 0.05) (Table 1). The continuous NRI revealed that the combined model outperformed these two in training and test sets.
Time-dependent ROC curves confirmed that the combined model outperformed all other models in the training (AUCs: 0.841-0.895) and test sets (AUCs: 0.712-0.848) at 6-18 months after BrM resection (Fig. 2). The K-M curves indicated that patients in the low-risk group exhibited better RFS compared to high-risk patients in the training and test sets (both P < 0.05, Figure. 3A, B). DCA demonstrated that the combined model yielded a net benefit for 6-month, 12-month, and 18-month recurrence across the entire spectrum of threshold probabilities in the training set and within the threshold probabilities of > 13.2%, > 22.8%, and > 49.7% in the test set (Figure. 4). Two representative cases are displayed to demonstrate the prediction performance of the nomogram (Figure. 3C).

Discussion

In this multicenter study, an MRI-based nomogram was developed and externally validated to predict intracranial recurrence and RFS in lung cancer patients after surgical resection of BrMs. Incorporating both radiomics and deep signatures into the clinical + structural MRI model can further enhance the predictive capacity of MRI-based models. The result showed that this combined model provided a reliable tool to estimate the risk for intracranial relapse after BrM neurosurgery.

Conclusion

The MRI-based nomogram can be used as a preoperative tool to predict intracranial recurrence after surgical resection of BrMs in lung cancer patients.

Acknowledgements

No acknowledgement found.

References

1. Lamba, N., Wen, P. Y. & Aizer, A. A. Epidemiology of brain metastases and leptomeningeal disease. Neuro Oncol. 2021; 23:1447-1456.

2. Cagney, D. N. et al. Incidence and prognosis of patients with brain metastases at diagnosis of systemic malignancy: a population-based study. Neuro Oncol. 2017; 19:1511-1521.

3. Suh, J. H. et al. Current approaches to the management of brain metastases. Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2020;17:279-299.

4. Proescholdt, M. A. et al. The Management of Brain Metastases-Systematic Review of Neurosurgical Aspects. Cancers (Basel). 2021;13.

5. Jünger, S. T., Reinecke, D., Meissner, A. K., Goldbrunner, R. & Grau, S. Resection of symptomatic non-small cell lung cancer brain metastasis in the setting of multiple brain metastases. J Neurosurg. 2022;136:1576-1582.

Figures

Figure. 1. Nomogram and its calibration curves. (A) A combined model was developed and presented as a nomogram to predict the risk of recurrence after BrM resection. (B) calibration of the nomogram in the training set. (C) calibration of the nomogram in the test set.

Table 1. Prognosis performances of different models in predicting RFS in lung cancer patients after BrM resection

Figure. 2. Time-dependent ROC analysis. Time-dependent ROC curves of different models in the training (A) and test sets (B).

Figure. 3. The K-M survival analysis and two representative cases. K-M survival analysis showed significant stratification of RFS in both the training set (P < 0.0001) (A) and test set (P < 0.0001) (B) using the combined model. (C) Two representative cases: Patient 1, a 53-year-old male at high-risk for recurrence based on our nomogram, experienced intracranial recurrence 3.2 months after BrM resection. Patient 2, a 34-year-old female assessed as low-risk for recurrence, encountered intracranial recurrence approximately 28.5 months post-resection of BrM.

Figure. 4. Decision curves for RFS at 6, 12 and 18 months using the nomogram in the training and test sets. The net benefit was calculated by summing the benefits (true-positive results) and subtracting the harms (false-positive results), with the latter weighted by a factor related to the relative harm of a poor prognosis compared to the harm of unnecessary surgery. The y-axis represents the net benefit.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 32 (2024)
3769
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/3769