Yinhao Ren1, Kecheng Yuan2, Guofang Xu1, Chunyou Ye1, Bensheng Qiu2, Xiang Nan3, and Jijun Han1
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China, 2Center for Biomedical Imaging, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, China, 3Department of Anatomy, Anhui Medical University, Hefei, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Electromagnetic Tissue Properties, Electromagnetic Tissue Properties
Motivation: The research is motivated by the limitations of current EPT, either over-sensitive or over-simplified algorithm, prompting the development of a more accurate WF-EPT method.
Goal(s): The study aims to enhance EPT by proposing WF-EPT with Dixon technique, seeking to improve accuracy in EPs mapping for clinical applications.
Approach: We fit measured EPs data to generate the WF-EPs model, and validate our approach via human imaging.
Results: Experiments showed relative errors of conductivity and relative permittivity of human liver were within 10.89% and 2.55% compared to literature values.
Impact: WF-EPT offers new insights for clinical EPT, potentially enhance applications in disease diagnosis and SAR estimation.
Introduction
Electrical
properties tomography (EPT) is a non-invasive approach for electrical
properties (EPs) mapping [1]. It holds significant potential for
disease diagnosis [2] and estimating specific absorption rate (SAR)
in ultra-high field MR [3]. However, the existing radiofrequency
transmit field-based EPT (B1-EPT) is known to be highly sensitive to noise,
preventing its clinical applications [4]. To overcome this
limitation, the water content‐based EPT (wEPT) algorithm was developed, which
provides improved resolution in EPs maps [5]. However, wEPT only
considers the effects of water content on EPs, lacking other components, which
would potentially introducing errors in EPs assessment. For accurate EPs
mapping, it is crucial to consider other factors rather than only water, such
as fat [6]. In this work, we proposed a water-fat content‐based EPT
(WF-EPT) approach with Dixon technique, which commonly employed in upper
abdominal MRI protocols [7]. The proposed method improves
the accuracy of EPs mapping by considering both water and fat content, meanwhile
also benefiting from the use of a conventional sequence, thereby facilitating
its clinical applications.Methods
To establish the numerical relationship
between fat-water and EPs (i.e. WF-EPs model), nine groups of human liver
tissue phantoms with various water and fat contents was fabricated, as
illustrated in Figure 1. We measured the EPs of each phantom using the
open-ended coaxial prober method [8]. Following that, WF-EPs fitted model was
generated by support vector machines. During the fitting process, we used the
relative water content (Rw) and relative fat content (Rf) as input data. These
were derived from the ratios W/Wmean and F/Fmean, where W and Wmean represent
the preset water content in phantoms and the average value in healthy liver,
respectively; F and Fmean represent corresponding amounts of fat.
We conducted abdominal WF-EPT imaging on
two volunteers using Dixon sequence at 3T. The scanning parameters: TE = 2.9
ms, TR = 140 ms, slice thickness = 8 mm, matrix size = 521×521, flip angle =
15°, and acquisition time = 18 s. The region of liver tissue was carefully
segmented through 3D slicer software. To eliminate the influence of scanning
parameters, we normalized water-only and fat-only signals from the Dixon images
by dividing the average signal in the liver region, respectively. These
normalized values were imported the well-fitted WF-EPs model to extract EPs. To
evaluate the performance of WF-EPT, we calculated the relative error between
our results and the literature EPs, which were defined as follows:
$$\mathrm{\Delta}\sigma=\ |\sigma_m-\sigma_t\ |/\sigma_t\ast100\%$$
$$\mathrm{\Delta}\varepsilon=\ |\varepsilon_m-\varepsilon_t\ |/\varepsilon_t\ast100\%$$Results
The phantom imaging results are shown in Figure 2.
The relative errors of reconstructed EPs are lower than 13.0% and 8.1% for
conductivity and permittivity, respectively. The results of human imaging
display in Figure 3, including water-only and fat-only signal, normalized
signal images and extracted EPs maps. Figure 4 illustrates the bias analysis of
the liver tissue EPs, the results showed that the relative errors between
literature values [9] and measured EPs by proposed method were all
less than 10.89%.Discussion/Conclusion
This
study demonstrated the feasibility of deriving EPs maps from water-fat content.
We developed the WF-EPs model fitted by EPs data acquired from liver phantoms
with varying water-fat contents. This model can be effectively integrated with
the Dixon water-fat quantification technique to enable clinical EPs
measurements. Human imaging experiment showed,
when compared to literature values, the mean relative errors in tissue conductivity and
relative permittivity of human liver, were
within 10.89% and 2.55%, respectively. These findings underscore the high
reliability of the proposed WF-EPT method for clinical applications, and hope this
study can offer valuable insights that may contribute to the further
development of EPT. Acknowledgements
This work is
supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No.
62271007, 82102742) and the Postgraduate Innovation Research and
Practice Program of Anhui Medical University (YJS20230041). The authors thank the Center for Scientific
Research of School of Biomedical Engineering, Anhui Medical University for
valuable help in our experiment.References
[1] Leijsen R,
Brink W, van den Berg C, et al. Electrical properties tomography: A
methodological review[J]. Diagnostics, 2021, 11(2): 176.
[2] Ke X Y, Hou
W, Huang Q, et al. Advances in electrical impedance tomography-based brain
imaging[J]. Military Medical Research, 2022, 9(1): 1-22.
[3] Zhang X,
Schmitter S, Van de Moortele P F, et al. From Complex B1 Mapping to Local SAR
Estimation for Human Brain MR Imaging Using Multi-Channel Transceiver Coil at
7T[J]. IEEE transactions on medical imaging, 2013, 32(6): 1058-1067.
[4] Liu J, Wang Y,
Katscher U, et al. Electrical properties tomography based on B1 maps in MRI:
principles, applications, and challenges[J]. IEEE Transactions on Biomedical
Engineering, 2017, 64(11): 2515-2530.
[5] Michel E,
Hernandez D, Lee S Y. Electrical conductivity and permittivity maps of brain
tissues derived from water content based on T1‐weighted acquisition[J].
Magnetic resonance in medicine, 2017, 77(3): 1094-1103.
[6] Miklavcic D,
Pavselj N, Hart F X. Electric properties of tissues[J]. Wiley encyclopedia of
biomedical engineering, 2006.
[7] Tian D, Sun Y,
Guo J, et al. 3.0 T unenhanced Dixon water-fat separation whole-heart coronary
magnetic resonance angiography: compressed-sensing sensitivity encoding imaging
versus conventional 2D sensitivity encoding imaging[J]. The International
Journal of Cardiovascular Imaging, 2023, 39(9): 1775-1784.
[8] Joof S,
Aydinalp C, Dilman I, et al. A Guideline for Complex Permittivity Retrieval of
Tissue-Mimicking Phantoms From Open-Ended Coaxial Probe Response With Deep
Learning[J]. IEEE Transactions on Microwave Theory and Techniques, 2022,
70(11): 5105-5115.
[9] Deng G, Cai L,
Feng J, et al. Reliable Method for Fabricating Tissue‐Mimicking Materials With
Designated Relative Permittivity and Conductivity at 128 MHz[J]. Bioelectromagnetic,
2021, 42(1): 86-94.