Xiaoqi Zhou1, Meicheng Chen2, Danyang Xu1, and Shi-Ting Feng2
1The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, guangzhou, China, 2The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Liver, Cancer, Habitat imaging
Motivation: Isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutation is an important therapeutic target for intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC).
Goal(s): To achieve non-invasive prediction of IDH1 mutation in ICC to assist in clinical management.
Approach: Preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI features and clinical information were retrospectively collected. Habitat analysis was performed based on pre- and post-enhancement T1 maps. Nomogram prediction model was established based on filtered variables.
Results: Higher serum AFP level, higher T1 change ratio, more frequent intratumoral vessel and T2 central brightness, and habitat 5 are risk factors for IDH1-mutated ICC. The combined nomogram model demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance over the clinilal+imaging model and the habitat model.
Impact: The proposed strategy, Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI
and T1–based habitat imaging, can be applied for preoperatively and
noninvasively identifying IDH1-mutation status in ICC, which offers potential
benefits in terms to aid in clinical management.
Introduction
In
recent years, the incidence of intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) has
gradually increased, but with a poor 5-year survival rate of only 5-10% [1]. Innovative
precision therapies are dedicated to finding genetic targets, with drugs
targeting isocitrate dehydrogenase 1 (IDH1) mutations showing promising
efficacy. Relevant drugs have been successively approved for ICC treatment and
included in the subsequent-line therapy [2,3]. However, the mutation status of
IDH1 depends on histopathological examination. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)-based
imaging features and machine learning are widely studied to evaluate the
microstructure of liver cancer which is important to enable
non-invasive assessment [4,5]. Additionally, habitat imaging allows for the
quantification and visualization of various subregions within the tumor [6,7]. The
purpose of this study was to develop an approach using Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI and
MRI-derived habitat imaging for preoperatively predicting IDH1 mutation status of
ICC.Methods
Eighty-five
patients with preoperative Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI examination were
prospectively included and randomly assigned to the training set (n=59) and the
test set (n=26). IDH1 mutation status was confirmed by next generation sequencing
or immunohistochemical analysis. MRI including morphological T1WI, multi-phase enhanced
imaging, hepatobiliary phase imaging, T2WI and pre- and post-enhanced T1 mapping
on 3T systems (Verio/Prisma/Vida, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany). MRI
features were qualitatively and quantitatively reviewed by two radiologists. A
clinical and imaging (C+I) nomogram model was developed by the risk factors
from clinical variables and MRI features explored. Then validated and evaluated
with the test set. The pre- and post-enhanced T1 mapping images were matched to
outline tumors of two sequences with one region of interest. Matchable tumors
without severe artifacts were screened for habitat analysis (n=73). The ICC lesions
were divided into five habitats, and the volume fraction of each habitat was
quantified. A combined nomogram model was constructed using the C+I nomogram
model and habitat fraction. The diagnostic accuracy was evaluated using the
area under the receiver operating characteristic curves (AUCs), and 95% confidence
intervals (CIs). Delong test was used to compare the diagnostic accuracy of
models. A p<0.05 was considered statistically significant.Results
The IDH1 mutation rate was 20% (17/85). IDH1-mutated
ICC exhibited significantly higher serum AFP level, higher T1 change ratio,
more frequent intratumoral vessel and T2 central brightness (p <
0.05), which were selected into the C+I model. C+I model performed well in both
training and test set (AUC = 0.860 and 0.800). After habitat analysis, habitat
5 was identified as a risk factor for IDH1 and added to the combined model (Figure1).
The combined nomogram model demonstrated the highest diagnostic performance
(AUC = 0.926, 95% CI: 0.866-0.986), followed by the C+I model (AUC = 0.825, 95%
CI: 0.724-0.927) and habitat model (AUC = 0.724, 95% CI: 0.586-0.861). Delong test
indicates that the combined model outperforms the other two models (p
< 0.05). Decision curve analysis implies that the combined nomogram model
offered more net benefit in identifying IDH1 mutation compared to the other
models.Discussion
This
was a preliminary feasibility study of MRI and habitat analysis for the
preoperative evaluation of IDH1 mutation in ICC. The results suggest that clinical
information and imaging features are strongly associated with IDH1 mutations
and allow for noninvasive prediction. As T1 change ratio was found to be an
independent risk factor, we chose to conduct the habitat analysis based on pre-
and post-contrast T1 mapping and identified habitat5 associated with IDH1
mutation. T1 change ratio in Gd-EOB-DTPA-enhanced MRI usually indicates
cellular uptake of the contrast agent. Considering that the abundant fibrous
and mucus components within the ICC may also allow the retention of contrast in
the cellular interstitial space, the correlation needs further analysis. The
association between IDH1 mutations and AFP levels is unclear in ICC [9]. As AFP is an
important marker in hepatic stem cells, the relationship between IDH1 mutations
and carcinogenesis also deserves further study. Although T2 central brightness
was one of the risk factors included in the C+I model, the differences in T2
relative signal ratio (tumor: erector spinae) and ADC values were not
significant. This may have been influenced by the small sample size and awaits
further studies in the future.Conclusions
MRI and habitat imaging shows clinical potential for noninvasively and preoperatively determining the IDH1-mutation status of ICC with high accuracy, offering potential benefits in terms to
aid in clinical management.Acknowledgements
Not applicable.References
1.Brindley PJ, Bachini
M, Ilyas SI, Khan SA, Loukas A, Sirica AE, Teh BT, Wongkham S, Gores GJ.
Cholangiocarcinoma. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2021 Sep 9;7(1):65. doi:
10.1038/s41572-021-00300-2. PMID: 34504109; PMCID: PMC9246479.
2.Lavacchi D, Caliman E,
Rossi G, Buttitta E, Botteri C, Fancelli S, Pellegrini E, Roviello G, Pillozzi
S, Antonuzzo L. Ivosidenib in IDH1-mutated cholangiocarcinoma: Clinical
evaluation and future directions. Pharmacol Ther. 2022 Sep;237:108170. doi: 10.1016/j.pharmthera.2022.108170.
Epub 2022 Mar 13. PMID: 35296436.
3. National
Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN Clinical Practice Guidelines in Oncology
(NCCN Guidelines®) Biliary Tract Cancer (Version 2.2023- May
10, 2023). Fort Washington: NCCN, 2023.
4. Tang
M, Zhou Q, Huang M, Sun K, Wu T, Li X, Liao B, Chen L, Liao J, Peng S, Chen S,
Feng ST. Nomogram development and validation to predict hepatocellular
carcinoma tumor behavior by preoperative gadoxetic acid-enhanced MRI. Eur
Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8615-8627. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07941-7. Epub 2021
Apr 20. PMID: 33877387.
5. Dong
Z, Huang K, Liao B, Cai H, Dong Y, Huang M, Zhou X, Jia Y, Xu L, Luo Y, Li ZP,
Feng ST. Prediction of sorafenib treatment-related gene expression for
hepatocellular carcinoma: preoperative MRI and histopathological correlation.
Eur Radiol. 2019 May;29(5):2272-2282. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5882-4. Epub 2018
Dec 13. PMID: 30547202.
6. Min JH, Kim YK, Choi
SY, Kang TW, Lee SJ, Kim JM, Ahn S, Cho H. Intrahepatic Mass-forming
Cholangiocarcinoma: Arterial Enhancement Patterns at MRI and Prognosis.
Radiology. 2019 Mar;290(3):691-699. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2018181485. Epub 2019
Jan 8. PMID: 30620253.
7. Verma R, Correa R,
Hill VB, Statsevych V, Bera K, Beig N, Mahammedi A, Madabhushi A, Ahluwalia M,
Tiwari P. Tumor Habitat-derived Radiomic Features at Pretreatment MRI That Are
Prognostic for Progression-free Survival in Glioblastoma Are Associated with Key
Morphologic Attributes at Histopathologic Examination: A Feasibility Study.
Radiol Artif Intell. 2020 Nov 11;2(6):e190168. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2020190168.
PMID: 33330847; PMCID: PMC7706886.
8. Zhang Y, Yang C,
Sheng R, Dai Y, Zeng M. Predicting the recurrence of hepatocellular carcinoma
(≤ 5 cm) after resection surgery with promising risk factors: habitat fraction
of tumor and its peritumoral micro-environment. Radiol Med. 2023
Oct;128(10):1181-1191. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01695-6. Epub 2023 Aug 19. PMID:
37597123.
9.Wang C, Jing H, Sha D, Wang W, Chen J, Cui Y, Han J. HBV-associated intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma with high serum alpha-fetoprotein: a case report with review of literature. BMC Infect Dis. 2016 Jun 14;16:295. doi: 10.1186/s12879-016-1643-7. PMID: 27301956; PMCID: PMC4908691.