Virendra Kumar1, Pradeep Kumar1, Rajeev Kumar2, Sanjay Thulkar3, Sanjay Sharma4, and Maroof Ahmad Khan5
1NMR, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India, 2Urology, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India, 3Radiodiagnosis , IRCH, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India, 4Radiadiagnosis,RPC, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India, 5Biostatistics, All India Institute of Medical sciences, New Delhi, India
Synopsis
Keywords: Prostate, Metabolism, Metabolomics, NMR
Motivation: Current diagnostic methods cannot predict the aggressiveness of prostate cancer (PCa) at a treatable stage of disease.
Goal(s): To interrogate tumorigenesis of PCa and AI/ML techniques to NMR-based targeted blood plasma metabolomic profiling analysis for prediction of PCa.
Approach: Use AI/ML approaches to NMR metabolic profiling for PCa patient blood plasma data analysis
Results: Phosphocreatine, choline, 3-hydroxybutyrate, taurine and glucose showed highest discriminate using CFS, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA, random forest models.
Impact: It will pave way to enhance
understanding of cancer pathogenesis and biomarker/s identification and early
detection systems.
Introduction
Prostate cancer (PCa) is the most commonly diagnosed malignancy in men over
the age of 50 years worldwide. It is a slow-growing cancer with the absence of
symptoms at early stages. Current diagnostic methods cannot predict PCa at a
treatable stage of the disease. Thus, the present study
to
interrogate tumorigenesis of PCa and apply Artificial Intelligence (AI)/
machine learning (ML) techniques to nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) spectroscopy-based
targeted blood plasma metabolomic profiling analysis for prediction of PCa from
non-cancer patients. It
will pave way to enhance understanding of cancer pathogenesis and biomarker/s
identification and early detection systems.
Methods
A total of 83 patients were
included in this study. Blood samples were collected from PCa
patients [(n = 42 median age: 68.5 (50-84) years; PSA: 26.02 (5.02-140) ng/mL;
GS (7-9)] and noncancer patients or prostatitis on TRUS guided biopsy [(n =41,
median age: 65 (54 - 81) years; PSA: 7.18 (4.12-37) ng/mL)], in morning
pre-prandial after overnight fasting. 1H-NMR spectra
of blood plasma samples were carried out at a 700 MHz spectrometer (Agilent,
USA) using 1D CPMG with pre-saturation. Parameters were used for the 1D NMR
experiment: 64 scans with a 70s relaxation delay and a spectral width of 9124.1 Hz
with an echo
time of 15ms. 2D COSY and TOCSY experiments were carried out for
assignments of metabolite peaks. Blood plasma metabolite and clinical data analysis were carried out by
machine learning (ML) or artificial intelligence (AL) using MetaboAnalyst
5.0. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant. Four
variable selection algorithms in correlation-based feature selection (CFS) PLS-DA,
OPLSDA, and random forest analysis were for diagnostic performance1.
Metabolites panel consisting of metabolites common in four selection algorithms
so-called overlapping set (OL). Further, SVM models were developed for which
parameter selection was performed by using 10-fold cross-validations. MSEA was
performed to identify which metabolic pathways were perturbed as a direct
result of PCa as compared to non-cancer patients. The study strategy from data pre and postprocessing through
performance evaluation is shown in Figure 1.
Results
Figure 2 shows the representative 1H spectrum (1D CPMG) of
a patient with PCa (a) and from non-cancer patient (b). In all, 25 metabolites
were assigned using 1D and 2D NMR. A p-value <0.05 was considered significant.
PLS-DA score and permutation
test are shown in Figure 2. Phosphocreatine, choline, 3-hydroxybutyrate,
taurine and glucose showed discriminate performance using CFS, PLS-DA, OPLS-DA and
random forest models are shown in Table 1. Figure 3 shows SVM models created
using different subsets of metabolites selected six models (2, 3, 5, 10, 20,
and 25) were developed. MSEA analysis using
the KEGG and SMPDB revealed the potential involvement of a list of prominent metabolic
pathways and DSPC metabolic networking are shown in Figure 4.
Discussion
The present study revealed a significantly
higher concentration of Phosphocreatine, choline,
3-hydroxybutyrate, taurine, and glucose in PCa patients as compared to non-cancer.
Higher concentration of Cho and lipids seen in blood plasma samples of patients
is associated with phospholipid metabolism of cancer cells2-5. High levels of taurine
affect cell proliferation and apoptosis while PCr and Glu are associated with energy-generating
pathways(2-5). The top 2 important
variables (Cho and PCr ) were used to build classification models and AUC value
was 0.83 and 95% CI was 0.64-0.97. The AUC using a larger number of variables
tried to achieve an even greater AUC value was 0.90 (95% CI, 0.77-1.0) when we
used 5 metabolites as the variables. The predictive accuracy showed a maximum
value of 82.4 % when 5 metabolites were
used as variables. The cross-validation model (2x2 matrix) utilizing
metabolites in the dataset had accuracies in the range of 80.41% to 94.92% an
AUC = 0.91 with a sensitivity of 88.10% and a specificity equal to 90.24%. Dysregulated
pathways include betaine metabolism, phospholipid biosynthesis, gluconeogenesis,
Warburg effect, and glycolysis in PCa progression and carcinogenesis. By performing additional variable
selection techniques, we believe that we have developed the most robust and
accurate biomarker/s panel for PCa diagnosis using NMR metabolomics in blood
plasma.
Conclusion
This
present study established that a selected panel of metabolites may
accurately detect PCa in blood plasma samples. Significant disturbances
of phospholipid and energy-generating pathways associated with PCa progression and
tumorigenesis. We
believe that metabolite biomarker/s as presented herein could have future
clinical utility for the diagnosis and monitoring of PCa if they are able to discriminate
non-cancer patients. Based on these results further work is acceptable to
validate these findings in a much larger cohort.
Acknowledgements
P.K thank ICMR for RA fellowship. References
1.Petrick LM, Shomron N. AI/ML-driven advances in untargeted
metabolomics and for biomedical applications. Cell Rep Phys Sci.
2022 Jul 20;3(7):100978.
2. Dereziński
P, Klupczynska A, Sawicki W, Pałka JA, Kokot ZJ. Amino Acid Profiles of Serum
and Urine in Search for Prostate Cancer Biomarkers: a Pilot Study. Int J Med
Sci. 2017 Jan 1;14(1):1-12.
3.Johansson, M. et al. One-carbon metabolism and
prostate cancer risk: prospective investigation of seven circulating B vitamins
and metabolites. Cancer Epidemiol. Biomarkers Prev. 18, 1538-43(2009).
4.Glunde, K., Bhujwalla, Z.M., Ronen, S.M. Choline metabolism in
malignant transformation. Nat. Rev. Cancer. 11,
835-48(2011).
5. McGarry, J.D., Foster, D.W. Regulation of hepatic fatty acid
oxidation and ketone body production. Annu. Rev.
Biochem. 49, 395-420(1980).