Mengke Liu1, Yuchi Tian2, Xiaoyun Liang2, and Rengui Wang1
1Department of Radiology, Beijing Shijitan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China, Beijing, China, 2Institute of Research and Clinical Innovations, Neusoft Medical Systems Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Diagnosis/Prediction, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
Motivation: Fluid and fat accumulation can be observed in MRI images of patients with PLEL; however, the microscopic characteristics of the different components of PLEL are currently unknown.
Goal(s): This study aimed to explore the MRI radiomics features of different components of subcutaneous soft tissues in patients with PLEL, such as simple fat, mixed fat and water, fat interstitial edema, and effusion
Approach: We propose a machine learning model to analyze the radiomics characteristics of different tissue components of lower extremity lymphedema in MRI.
Results: he four-class model, using 15 selected radiomics features, shows outstanding performance with an overall accuracy of 0.866.
Impact: The different
components of subcutaneous soft tissues of PLEL patients, such as simple fat,
mixed fat and water, adipose interstitial edema and effusion, have unique radiomic
features.
Background or purpose:
Primary lymphedema
lower extremity is a chronic progressive swelling of the limb due to
interrupted or impaired lymphatic return, excessive accumulation of lymphatic
fluid in the subcutaneous soft tissues of the limb, lipohypertrophy, and
fibrous connective tissue hyperplasia 1,2. Understanding a patient's
fat and fluid composition may help determine the clinical approach that is best
suited for them. Limbs with advanced lipoatrophy may not respond well to
conservative treatments such as Comprehensive Decongestive Therapy (CDT), and
liposuction is beneficial in patients with predominantly lipoatrophy;
conversely, limbs with predominantly fluid accumulation may respond better to
CDT or lymphovascular-venous anastomosis 3. On the STIR-sequence
image of MRI, lymphedema is mainly composed of high signal fluid and low signal
fat. Although previous studies have evaluated the preferred site and
distribution pattern of the hydro-lipid component in lymphedema 4,
microscopic characterization of the hydro-lipid component has not been reported
yet. In this study, we performed feature extraction and screening of the
components of fluid and fat in PLEL based on MRI radiomic, and explored the
clinical significance of the representative histologic features of each
component.Materials and Methods:
Subjects: Retrospective
analysis of 112 patients diagnosed with unilateral primary lower limb
lymphedema in the Department of Lymphatic Surgery at Beijing Shijitan Hospital
between January 2018 and December 2021, with the diagnostic criteria of
unilateral lower limb lymphatic vessels vaguely visualized or not visualized by
nuclide lymphatic imaging or visualizers showing under the skin.
Algorithm:
Firstly, the
subcutaneous tissue region was manually
segmented to obtain the region of interest (ROI). Subsequently, a statistical
analysis of pixel values corresponding to different components of lower limb
tissue was conducted, and a thresholding method was employed to extract four
ROI components, including fat, fat-water gap edema, edema, and fat-water
mixture. After the extraction of each component, 1236 radiomics features were
extracted using PyRadiomics. The samples were then categorized into four groups
based on the four component types. Initially, low-variance features were
eliminated to enhance data quality, followed by centralization and
standardization of the feature matrix. Dimensionality reduction was performed
through Spearman correlation coefficient analysis to eliminate features with
correlations exceeding 0.8, thereby reducing redundant information, resulting
in the selection of the top 20 highly correlated features. Additionally, Lasso
regression, combined with 10-fold cross-validation, was used to determine the
optimal alpha value, and 15 of the most influential features were selected for
subsequent classification tasks. Subsequently, a logistic regression model was
constructed and trained to ensure optimal performance and convergence.
Statistical
analysis:
The classification
performance assessment involved Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC)
analysis and confusion matrix analysis.Results:
The
four-class model, using 15 selected radiomics features, shows
outstanding performance with an overall accuracy of 0.866. Additionally, it
achieves high AUC values of 0.97, 0.98, 0.99, and 0.95 for Fat-only, Adipose
space edema, Hydrops, and Fat-water-mix, respectively (Figures 1-3).Discussion:
The PLEL component
analysis based on the thresholding segmentation method can assist clinicians in
evaluating the content of components such as water lipids in PLEL lesions, therefore
providing a certain diagnostic basis for clinical decision-making. However, traditional
MRI image analysis cannot extract the microscopic heterogeneity of the lesion
area. Radiomics is
a new method of medical image analysis in recent years 5. It can extract
a large amount of information related to microenvironment from images with high
throughput through advanced mathematical algorithms, such as heterogeneity,
shape, texture, and density, etc., from images in a reproducible manner,
followed by feature extraction and modeling 6. Furthermore,
radiomics modeling requires a small number of sample cases, which saves a large
amount of computational time; this, therefore, can be effectively applied to
the diagnosis of some rare diseases diagnosis. In this study, we extracted and
screened the radiomics features that can distinguish the different components
of simple fat, mixed fat and water, fat interstitial edema and effusion, and
the similarities and differences of these four components can be characterized
from a microscopic point of view(see Figure 4). Importantly, the radiomic models constructed
from each of the four components have demonstrated good discriminatory values. However,
the limitations of this study are the small sample size and the lack of
pathologic controls for the four components.Acknowledgements
Mengke Liu and Yuchi Tian contributed equally to this work. References
1. Sudduth
CL, Greene AK. Primary Lymphedema: Update on Genetic Basis and Management[J].
Adv Wound Care (New Rochelle). 2022;11(7):374-381
2.
Maclellan RA, Greene AK. Lymphedema[J]. Semin Pediatr Surg.
2014;23(4):191-197.
3.
Brorson H Liposuction Normalizes Lymphedema Induced Adipose Tissue
Hypertrophy in Elephantiasis of the Leg – A Prospective Study with a Ten-Y ear
Follow-Up. Plast Reconstr Surg.2015;136:133–134.
4.
Dayan JH, Wiser I, Verma R, et al. Regional Patterns of Fluid and Fat
Accumulation in Patients with Lower Extremity Lymphedema Using Magnetic
Resonance Angiography[J]. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2020;145(2):555-563
5. Mayerhoefer M E, Materka A, Langs G, et al.
Introduction to radiomics[J]. Journal of Nuclear Medicine, 2020, 61(4):
488-495.
6.
Son H, Lee S, Kim K, Koo KI, Hwang CH. Deep learning-based quantitative
estimation of lymphedema-induced fibrosis using three-dimensional computed
tomography images[J]. Sci Rep. 2022;12(1):15371. Published 2022 Sep 13