Zhengyang Zhu1, Jianan Zhou1, Zengping Lin2, Jianmin Yuan2, Huiquan Yang1, Chuanshuai Tian1, Xin Zhang1, and Bing Zhang1
1Department of Radiology, The Affiliated Drum Tower Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, China, 2Central Research Institute, United Imaging Healthcare Group Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors (Pre-Treatment), Brain, Ki67, IDH, Glioma
Motivation: WHO grade, Ki67 and IDH mutation are important for management and prognosis evaluation in glioma patients.
Goal(s): To investigate the value of Tri-exponential model (TEM) in preidcting WHO grade, Ki67 and IDH mutation of gliomas
Approach: 12 b-value DWI were obtained from glioma patients, TEM, SEM and IVIM model were analyzed for each patient. Univariate and Multivariate Logistic Regression were utilized to construct prediction model.
Results: TEM model achieved highest AUC on WHO Grade prediction task, while IVIM performed better on Ki67 and IDH mutation prediction task.
Impact: This study illustrated the potential of applying TEM model on predicting WHO
grade Ki67 and IDH mutation in adult diffuse gliomas.
Intraduction
Glioma is
the most common malignant brain tumor and can be classified into low-grade
gliomas and high-grade gliomas. In the latest 2021 edition of WHO central
nervous system tumor classification. Isocitrate dehydrogenase (IDH) was introduced
as the key molecular marker to make an integrated genetic diagnosis[1].
Diffusion
weighted imaging (DWI) detects the motion of water molecules within tumor
tissues and the tumor microenvironment. Apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC)
value derived from a mono-exponential model is used clinically to quantify the
water diffusion. In general, diffusion-weighted signal is assumed to follow an
ideal exponential decay, and the resulting ADC should be independent of the
chosen b-value. However, this is often inconsistent with what we actually
observe in human tissue, which is often attributed to the non-Gaussian nature
of diffusion. Dozens of diffusion models (e.g., diffusion kurtosis, fractional
order calculus, continuous time random walk) have been created to address this
problem [2-4].
Recently,
a novel triexponential model (TEM) was established. The purpose of this
study was to explore the diagnostic performance of TEM metrics in evaluating
WHO grades and IDH mutation in glioma patients. We also compared the performance
of TEM with Intro-Voxel Incoherent Movement (IVIM) and Stretched Exponential Model
(SEM) in different prediction task.Materials and Methods
The
prospective study was approved by our Institute Review Board. Patients
diagnosed as adult diffuse glioma between September 2022 and September 2023 were
included. WHO Grade of Tumor was determined by post-surgical pathological
analysis according to 2021 5th edition of Central Nervous System Tumor
Classification. Ki67 level was determined by immunochemical staining. IDH mutation
were determined by Sanger sequencing of tumor sample after surgery.
All patients underwent examination before surgery in a 3.0T MR scanner
(uMR790, United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China). Routine MRI sequences
included: 3D T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), 3D T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), 3D T2
fluid-attenuated inversion-recovery (T2-FLAIR). Multi-b-value
DWI was performed using a single-shot spin-echo echo planar imaging sequence
(SS SE-EPI) with 12 b-values (0, 20, 50, 100, 200, 400, 1000, 1500, 2000, 2500,
and 3000 s/mm2) in three orthogonal directions. All diffusion data
were processed by using an in-house program implemented with MATLAB R2021b
software. The intermediate and perfusion-related diffusion coefficients (Dint
and Dp) and fractions of strictly limited, intermediate, and
perfusion-related diffusion (Fvery-slow, Fint, and Fp)
were obtained from triexponential multi-b-value DWI model:
$$S(b)= S_0*[F_s+F_f exp(-bD_f )+F_p exp(-bD_p ) ]$$,
$$F_s+F_f+F_p=1$$
where S0 and S(b) are signals at b-value = 0 s/mm2 and
other b-values, respectively.
Region-of-interests of tumor and normal white matter (nWM) were
delineated manually. Parameter values were normalized by nWM. Univariate and Multivariate
Logistic Regression were used to select metrics and construct prediction model.
For Univariate Logistic Regression, parameters with P<0.2 were selected and
fused in Multivariate Logistic regression. For Multivariate Logistic regression,
parameters with P<0.05 were considered as statistically significant. Performance
of differential diagnosis was quantified using area under ROC curve (AUC).Results
Forty-nine
patients were included (mean age 60.67±13.75, 13 females) in this study, with
38 high-grade gliomas and 11 low-grade gliomas, 34 high Ki67 level and 15 low
Ki67 level, 36 IDH-wildtype and 11 IDH mutant. Metrics of IVIM, SEM and TEM
were obtained for each patient.
For WHO Grades task, model-wise AUCs were 0.976 (TEM), 0.969(IVIM), 0.835
(SEM) respectively. Fp of TEM, Ff of TEM, DDC of SEM, F of IVIM and D of IVIM
were independent predictive parameters in multivariate logistic regression.
For Ki67 level task, model-wise AUCs were 0.822 (IVIM), 0.773(TEM), 0.655
(SEM) respectively. F of IVIM and D of IVIM were independent predictive
parameters in multivariate logistic regression.
For IDH mutation
task, model-wise AUCs were 0.992 (IVIM), 0.923(TEM), 0.879 (SEM) respectively. Dp of
TEM and DDC of SEM were independent predictive parameters in multivariate logistic
regression.Discussion and conclusion
TEM model
achieved highest AUC on WHO Grade prediction task, while IVIM performed better
on Ki67 and IDH mutation prediction task.
This
study illustrated the potential of applying TEM model on predicting WHO grade Ki67
and IDH mutation in adult diffuse gliomas. Our following plan is a prospective study with
large cohort to explore the diagnosis effect of TEM in predicting other key
molecular markers in gliomas.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. SHOBEIRI P, SEYEDMIRZAEI H, KALANTARI A, et al. The Epidemiology of Brain
and Spinal Cord Tumors [J]. Adv Exp Med Biol, 2023, 1394: 19-39.
2. Jensen JH, Helpern JA, Ramani A, Lu H, Kaczynski K. (2005) Diffusional
kurtosis imaging: the quantification of non-Gaussian water diffusion by means
of magnetic resonance imaging. Magn Reson Med, 53:1432–40.
3. Novikov DS, Fieremans E, Jensen JH, Helpern JA. (2011) Random walks with
barriers. Nat Phys, 7(6):508–14
4. Zhou XJ, Gao Q, Abdullah O, Magin RL. (2010) Studies of anomalous
diffusion in the human brain using fractional order calculus. Magn Reson Med
63:562–9.