Ankit Mohanty1, Neha Yadav1, and Vivek Tiwari1
1Biological Sciences, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research, Berhampur, Berhampur, India
Synopsis
Keywords: Tumors (Pre-Treatment), Multimodal, Glioma, Survival, presurgical
Motivation: Gliomas of similar histologic grade show a lot of difference in the growth and development. And the survival of patients with similar histologic grades also vary.
Goal(s): The shape variations of gliomas impact survival or not.
Approach: We calculated the fractal dimension and lacunarity of the subcomponents of gliomas and analyzed them along with survival data to obtain differences in overall survival.
Results: Variations in fractal Dimension and Lacunarity also present variations in overall survival. Subjects with higher enhancing fractal dimension had shortened survival and it was opposite for nonenhancing fractal dimension and enhancing lacunarity. Survival did not depend on edema subcomponent.
Impact: The study's results could revolutionize glioma patient care. Clinicians may integrate fractal dimension and lacunarity as prognostic markers for tailored treatment decisions. Scientists may explore their use in combination with genetic factors for accurate survival predictions and improving patient outcomes.
INTRODUCTION
In 2016, the World Health Organization (WHO) updated
the classification of gliomas, introducing a molecular basis for
categorization, distinguishing between IDH mutant and wild-type variants.
Regardless of the histological grade, gliomas with mutations in isocitrate
dehydrogenase (IDH) tend to have a favorable prognosis and increased survival
compared to IDH wild-type ones. Furthermore, certain glioblastomas (GBMs)
exhibit epigenetic methylation of the O6-methylguanine-DNA methyltransferase
(MGMT) enzyme, while others have non-methylated MGMT. Gliomas with MGMT
methylation generally have more prolonged overall survival and respond better
to alkylating chemotherapy.
Gliomas, even of the same
histological type, display variations in their structure and shape. The fractal
dimension measures the complexity of shapes, while lacunarity assesses the
arrangement of substructures within the tumor mass. By analyzing these
geometric parameters, we can analyze the survival differences in patients with
different grades of gliomas and improve clinical management.METHODS
This study focused on individuals diagnosed with
low-grade glioma or glioblastoma and used data from The Cancer Imaging Archive
(TCIA), specifically the TCGA-LGG and TCGA-GBM repositories. The dataset
included preoperative MRI scans with T1-weighted, T2-weighted, T2w-fluid
attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR), and contrast-enhanced T1-weighted (T1c)
sequences. It also provided tumor segmentation masks and information about age
at diagnosis, gender, and IDH mutation status.
Tumor segmentation labels were generated following the
GLISTRboost protocol and underwent manual corrections and expert
neuroradiologist approval.
Fractal dimension (FD) and lacunarity were computed
using custom Python pipelines. FD was calculated using the 2D box-counting
method applied to the binarized tumor mask. The estimated values were averaged
for different tumor subcomponents (enhancing, non-enhancing, and edema).
Lacunarity for each subcomponent was determined using
the gliding box algorithm and the binned probability distribution method. It
involved analyzing the intensity distribution of pixel values within each box.
The mean lacunarity for each subcomponent was computed.
Statistical analyses were conducted using Python and
R, with a significance threshold of p<0.05, corrected for multiple
comparisons. Maximally selected rank statistics determined optimal cutoff
values for FD and lacunarity. Kaplan-Meier survival analysis and the log-rank
test assessed overall survival based on these cutoff values. Univariate and
multivariate Cox Proportional Hazard models explored the prognostic
significance of FD and lacunarity for each tumor subcomponent.RESULTS
Cutoff values were employed to explore the relationship
between fractality, lacunarity, and overall survival in distinct tumor
subcomponents. In the enhancing subcomponent, a fractal dimension exceeding
0.69 was significantly associated with shortened overall survival (OS = 17.1
months, p < 0.0001), yielding a hazard ratio of 3.9 (95% CI, 1.9 - 8.2).
Conversely, the non-enhancing subcomponent exhibited reduced survival with a
fractal dimension below 1.2 (OS = 17.1 months, p = 0.002), resulting in a 52%
reduction in the risk of death (HR = 0.48, 95% CI, 0.30 - 0.78). Notably, the
edema subcomponent did not correlate significantly with overall survival (p =
0.43).
Similarly, specific lacunarity cutoff values were
established for each subcomponent. Within the enhancing subcomponent,
lacunarity values falling below 3.52 were associated with shorter survival (OS
= 15.3 months, p < 0.001) and a higher hazard ratio (HR = 4.1, 95% CI, 1.9 -
8.6). Likewise, the non-enhancing subcomponent showed a similar trend, with
lacunarity levels above the threshold of 1.48 correlating with reduced survival
(OS = 15.3 months, p < 0.001) and a higher hazard ratio. Lower lacunarity
below the 0.97 threshold was associated with shorter survival (p = 0.006) and a
decreased hazard ratio (HR = 0.52, 95% CI, 0.32 - 0.84) for the edema
subcomponent. These findings underscore the prognostic significance of
fractality and lacunarity in distinct tumor subcomponents.DISCUSSION
This pioneering study investigates glioma's three
subcomponents (enhancing, non-enhancing, and edema) using fractal dimension and
lacunarity calculations to correlate with patient survival. Higher fractal
dimension indicates shorter survival in enhancing regions, reflecting tumor
aggressiveness, while lower values are linked to reduced survival in
non-enhancing areas. Lacunarity exhibits an opposing trend, with lower values
in enhancing regions and higher values in non-enhancing areas associated with
extended survival. These findings suggest the potential of fractal dimension
and lacunarity as practical prognostic markers for gliomas.CONCLUSION
This study found a relationship between morphological
variations within segmented tumor areas and patients' survival results. The fractal
dimension and lacunarity, which serve as a measure of form heterogeneity, have
revealed clear threshold values that can clearly distinguish the overall
survival between patients. These findings highlight the potential of these
morphological parameters to play an essential role in prognostic assessments
and guide clinical decisions in cancer management.Acknowledgements
I acknowledge TCIA for the imaging and genomic data of Gliomas, and I also believe DST - SERB and ICMR India for the generous funding.References
1.
Louis DN, Perry A,
Reifenberger G, von Deimling A, Figarella-Branger D, Cavenee WK, Ohgaki H,
Wiestler OD, Kleihues P, Ellison DW. The 2016 World Health Organization
Classification of Tumors of the Central Nervous System: a summary. Acta
Neuropathol. 2016 Jun;131(6):803-20. doi: 10.1007/s00401-016-1545-1. Epub 2016
May 9. PMID: 27157931.
2.
Beiko J, Suki D, Hess KR
et al. IDH1 mutant malignant astrocytomas are more amenable to surgical
resection and have a survival benefit associated with maximal surgical
resection.
3.
Shyamala, K., H. C.
Girish, and Sanjay Murgod. "Risk of tumor cell seeding through biopsy and
aspiration cytology." Journal of International Society of Preventive
& Community Dentistry 4.1 (2014): 5.
4.
Clark K, Vendt B, Smith
K, Freymann J, Kirby J, Koppel P, Moore S, Phillips S, Maffitt D, Pringle M,
Tarbox L, Prior F. The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): Maintaining and Operating
a Public Information Repository, Journal of Digital Imaging, Volume 26, Number
6, December, 2013, pp 1045-1057. DOI: 10.1007/s10278-013-9622-7
5.
Bakas S, Akbari H,
Sotiras A, Bilello M, Rozycki M, Kirby J, Freymann J, Farahani K, Davatzikos C.
(2017) Segmentation Labels and Radiomic Features for the Pre-operative Scans of
the TCGA-LGG collection [Data Set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.GJQ7R0EF
6.
Bakas S, Akbari H,
Sotiras A, Bilello M, Rozycki M, Kirby J, Freymann J, Farahani K, Davatzikos C.
(2017). Segmentation Labels for the Pre-operative Scans of the TCGA-GBM
collection [Data set]. The Cancer Imaging Archive. DOI: 10.7937/K9/TCIA.2017.KLXWJJ1Q
7.
Bakas S, Akbari H,
Sotiras A, Bilello M, Rozycki M, Kirby J, Freymann J, Farahani K, Davatzikos C.
(2017) Advancing The Cancer Genome Atlas glioma MRI collections with expert
segmentation labels and radiomic features Nature Scientific Data, 4:170117 DOI:
10.1038/sdata.2017.117
8.
Kroell, N., (2021). imea:
A Python package for extracting 2D and 3D shape measurements from images.
Journal of Open Source Software, 6(60), 3091, https://doi.org/10.21105/joss.03091
9.
Plotnick, Roy E., Robert
H. Gardner, and Robert V. O'Neill. "Lacunarity indices as measures of
landscape texture." Landscape ecology 8 (1993): 201-211.