Lan Lu1, Yilin Liu2, Amy Zhou1, Pew-Thian Yap3, and Yong Chen4,5
1Radiation Oncology, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, United States, 2Computer Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, 3Radiology, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, United States, 4Radiology, Case Western Reserve University, Cleveland, OH, United States, 5Radiology, University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center, Cleveland, OH, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: MR Fingerprinting, Quantitative Imaging
Motivation: Quantitative MR imaging with volumetric coverage is relatively slow, which hinders its clinical evaluation.
Goal(s): To leverage simultaneous multislice MR Fingerprinting (SMSMRF) and deep learning to achieve high multi-band factors for rapid quantitative imaging.
Approach: We introduced a Spatio-Temporal UNet (STUN) method to exploit both spatial and temporal correlations of signals in SMSMRF to largely accelerate data acquisition.
Results: High multi-band factors (3 and 4) with an additional 4x acceleration along the temporal dimension were achieved, providing rapid data sampling of 1.5~2 sec per slice for quantitative brain imaging.
Impact: The developed SMSMRF method holds great
potential to accelerate quantitative imaging for challenging subjects, f.g.
pediatric patients.
Introduction
MR Fingerprinting (MRF) is a
quantitative imaging technique that enables rapid and simultaneous
quantification of multiple tissue properties (1). Recent efforts have focused
on expanding the spatial coverage of the technique, including simultaneous
multislice (SMS) acquisitions (2-4). Due to the extremely high acceleration
factor applied for in-plane encoding, dramatic aliasing artifacts exist which
lead to significant challenges for unaliasing along the slice acquisition
direction with SMS-MRF. Deep learning methods have been developed to replace the
conventional template matching approach for improved tissue characterization
and acquisition speed (5-7). Nevertheless, the majority of these methods focus solely on either the spatial or temporal aspects of the signal evolution, limiting its capability to extract information from the intricate MRF signals. In this study, we propose a Spatio-Temporal UNet
(STUN) which exploits both spatial and temporal correlations of the signal to improve
the performance of SMS-MRF. Methods
All MRI measurements
were performed on a Siemens 3T scanner. SMS-MRF acquisitions with multi-band (MB)
factors 3 and 4 were acquired from five normal subjects (10~20 scans per subject). Single-slice MRF
acquisitions were also acquired from the corresponding slice locations to establish
high-quality, reference T1 and T2 maps for training the network (described
below). For both single-slice and SMS-MRF acquisitions, the acquisition time for
each scan was 23 sec, encompassing a total of 2,304 MRF time frames. Multiband
RF pulses generated from SINC waveforms with phase modulation were used to
excite multiple slices simultaneously. The slice thickness was 5mm and the
distance between adjacent slices was 10 mm. Each MRF time frame was highly
undersampled in-plane by acquiring one spiral arm (R=48). Other imaging
parameters included FOV, 30×30 cm; matrix, 256×256; flip angle, 5º∼12º; TR, 7 msec.
A spatially-constrained quantification
(SCQ) network was previously developed to accelerate data acquisition along the
temporal dimension for single-slice 2D MRF (6). In this network, the MRF time
frames are treated as channels in the neural network. As a result, the method
is insensitive to the temporal ordering of the time frames. In order to exploit
the signal temporal correlations, the temporal dimension of the input was
treated as a new dimension in STUN instead of channels to allow for convolving
jointly over time and space. This was performed using factorized
spatio-temporal convolution with two separate and successive operations: a 2D
spatial convolution and a 1D temporal convolution (Fig 1a). Factorized
convolution is tailored to accommodate the distinctive nature of the MRF signal
with different correlation patterns in the spatial and temporal dimensions.
The STUN was first trained using
the acquired SMS-MRF images (4x acceleration with only 576 time points) as the
network input and high-quality T1&T2 maps from single-slice MRF (all 2304
time points) acquired at the corresponding slices as the network reference (Fig
1b). With the concern of potential head motions between the separated SMS-MRF
and single-slice MRF acquisitions, the STUN network was also trained using
SMS-MRF data generated through simulations based on single-slice MRF
acquisitions (Fig 1c). Specifically, the same phase modulation used to generate
the multiband RF was applied on the reconstructed single-slice MRF data to
simulate an SMS-MRF dataset. The performance was compared to the standard
template matching method and the SCQ network. Prospective acquisition of SMS-MRF
data with 576 time points was also performed on another volunteer to evaluate
the method. Acquisitions with a MB factor 3 and 4 were acquired in 6 sec,
corresponding to 2 sec/slice and 1.5 sec/slice, respectively.Results
Figures 2&3 show representative
T1 and T2 maps obtained with two different MB factors. The
summary of cross-validation for all 5 subjects is presented in Table 1. Compared
with the results from template matching, deep learning methods significantly
reduced the amount of aliasing artifacts. The proposed STUN network also
outperformed the SCQ network for most of the measurements, indicating more
information is extracted with the proposed method. Both STUN and SCQ networks
show better performance when trained using the acquired SMS-MRF data as
compared to the simulated training data. This is likely due to imperfect
SMS-MRF simulation, such as not accounting for the cross-talking effects
between simultaneously excited slices. The prospectively acquired data shows similar map quality as compared to the results from retrospectively undersampled data for both MB factors (Fig 5).Discussion and Conclusion
In this study, a spatio-temporal U-Net was developed for efficient and accurate T1 and T2 quantifications for SMS-MRF. The same MRF acquisition patterns were applied to all excited slices in the experiment. Future work will focus on varying acquisition parameters across slices to achieve better image quality and MB factors (4).Acknowledgements
Siemens Healthineers and NIH grants 1R01 CA266702, and 1R01 CA282516.References
1.
Ma D, et al. Nature, 2013; 187–192.
2. Hamilton,
JI, et al. NMR Biomed, 2019; e4041.
3. Ye
H, et al. MRM, 2016; 2078-2085.
4. Jiang
Y, et al. MRM, 2017; 1870-1876.
5. Cohen
O, et al. MRM, 2018; 885-894.
6. Fang
Z, et al. TMI, 2019; 2364-2374.
7.
Fang Z, et al. MRM, 2020; 579-591.