Keywords: Vascular, Blood vessels, Carotid Diameter, Pulsatile Motion, Angiography
Motivation: The carotid artery anatomy is routinely studied with MRI, whilst its relative diameter change is evaluated using ultrasound. An MRI technique to measure the carotid diameter change throughout the cardiac cycle could therefore be complementary to the existing toolset.
Goal(s): To combine carotid MR angiography and diameter change quantification in one scan without contrast agent injection.
Approach: A 4D (3D+time) free-running sequence was extended with slab-selective RF pulses to increase the inflow blood-to-muscle contrast. Carotid diameter changes and contrast ratios were quantified.
Results: The contrast ratio significantly improved with the use of slab-selective pulses and the carotid relative diameter change was precisely measured.
Impact: 4D free-running MR angiography with slab-selective RF pulses allows for the dynamic visualization of the carotid lumen and the quantification of the relative carotid diameter change throughout the cardiac cycle without contrast agent injection.
1. Donkor, E. S. Stroke in the 21st Century: A Snapshot of the Burden, Epidemiology, and Quality of Life. Stroke Res Treat, (2018). doi:10.1155/2018/3238165
2. Sedaghat S. et al. Common Carotid Artery Diameter and Risk of Cardiovascular Events and Mortality Pooled Analyses of Four Cohort Studies. Hypertension 72, 85–92 (2018). doi:10.1161/HYPERTENSIONAHA.118.11253
3. Cuadrado Godia, E. et al. Carotid Artery Distensibility: A Reliability Study. J Ultrasound Med. 9, 1157–1165 (2007). doi:10.7863/jum.2007.26.9.1157
4. Nederkoorn, P. J. et al. Time-of-Flight MR Angiography of Carotid Artery Stenosis: Does a Flow Void Represent Severe Stenosis? American Journal of Neuroradiology 23, 1779–1784 (2002).
5. Kojo, M. et al. Normal Developmental Changes in Carotid Artery Diameter Measured by Echo-Tracking. Pediatr Neurol 18, 221–226 (1998). doi: 10.1016/s0887-8994(97)00195-1
6. Coppo, S. et al. Free-running 4D whole-heart self-navigated golden angle MRI: Initial results. Magn Reson Med 74, 1306–1316 (2015). doi:10.1002/mrm.25523
7. Piccini, D. et al. Spiral phyllotaxis: The natural way to construct a 3D radial trajectory in MRI. Magn Reson Med 66, 1049–1056 (2011). doi:10.1002/mrm.22898
8. Ferincz, R. et al. Slab-selection in free-running cardiac and respiratory motion-resolved bSSFP 5D whole-heart MRI. ISMRM 3095 (2023).
9. Lustig, M. et al. Sparse MRI: The application of compressed sensing for rapid MR imaging. Magn Reson Med 58, 1182–1195 (2007). doi:10.1002/mrm.21391
10. Bustin, A. et al. High-dimensionality undersampled patch-based reconstruction (HD-PROST) for accelerated multi-contrast MRI. Magn Reson Med 81, 3705–3719 (2019). doi:10.1002/mrm.27694
11. Hansen, F. et al. Diameter and compliance in the human common carotid artery-variations with age and sex. Pergamon Ultrasound in Med. & Biol 21, 1-9 (1995). doi:10.1016/0301-5629(94)00090-5
12. Boussel, L. et al. Swallowing, arterial pulsation, and breathing induce motion artifacts in carotid artery MRI. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging 23, 413–415 (2006). doi:10.1002/jmri.20525
13. Feng, L. et al. 5D whole-heart sparse MRI. Magn Reson Med 79, 826–838 (2018). doi:10.1002/mrm.26745
Figure 1. Overview of the free-running framework. (A) Continuous acquisition of data using a segmented 3D radial trajectory and k-space cardiac binning into N bins of 80 ms using the pulse oximeter signal. (B) Comparison of blood-to-muscle contrast between images obtained with non-selective and slab-selective RF pulses. (C) Example measurement of the carotid diameter in a healthy volunteer to quantify the relative diameter change throughout the cardiac cycle.
Figure 2. Blood-to-muscle contrast ratio for both carotids. (A) Contrast ratio between non-selective (NS) and slab-selective (SS) acquisition. The contrast ratio significantly increased for the slab-selective case (pleft<0.0001 and pright<0.0001). (B) Contrast ratio between the clinical TOF acquisition and the SS images in a subset of 6 volunteers. The thin TOF slices resulted in higher contrast ratios (pleft=0.0008 and pright=0.003).
Figure 3. Diastolic and systolic diameter measurements for both carotids. (A) Diameter measurements in the slab-selective (SS) and cine acquisitions. There is a slight but consistent underestimation of the diameter in both phases in the SS images, which is statistically significant in the diastolic phase (pleft=0.001 and pright=0.0004). (B) Relative diameter change (RDC) in the SS and cine acquisitions. A significant overestimation can be observed in the SS case (pleft=0.0004 and pright<0.0001).
Figure 4. Axial comparison of the carotid arteries. In the lower-left corners, the average contrast ratio of both arteries is displayed. A difference in contrast between TOF and slab-selective images in the systolic phase can be observed but not as pronounced as between the non-selective and slab-selective acquisitions.
Figure 5. Animated 3D representation of the pulsating carotid in subject #1.