Keywords: Functional Connectivity, Parkinson's Disease, deep brain stimulation
Motivation: Addressing subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN-DBS) limitations in Parkinson's Disease (PD), such as metabolic disorder and cognitive dysfunction. We explored nucleus accumbens deep brain stimulation (NAc-DBS) as an alternative, aiming to enhance motor, cognitive, and metabolic functions comprehensively.
Goal(s): Investigate NAc-DBS effectiveness, bridging STN-DBS gaps, enhancing motor skills, and improving cognitive and metabolic functions in PD.
Approach: Utilized behavioral tests, brain magnetic resonance imaging analysis, and bioenergetic analysis to evaluate NAc-DBS and STN-DBS impact on the MitoPark PD mouse model.
Results: NAc-DBS significantly enhanced cognitive, motor functions, and energy metabolism, offering a promising therapeutic solution for PD patients.
Impact: Our findings transform Parkinson's treatment, sheding a light to patients. The dual benefits of NAc-DBS inspire new inquiries, reshaping therapies with metabolic modulation. Improved outcomes redefine standards, offering hope for enhanced quality of life.
This work is financially supported by the National Science and Technology Council under Contract numbers of NSTC 112-2622-8-A49-010-TE2, 111-2221-E-A49-049-MY2, 112-2314-B-303-016-, 112-2321-B-A49-009-.
1. Ekstrand MI, Terzioglu M, Galter D, Zhu S, Hofstetter C, Lindqvist E, et al. Progressive parkinsonism in mice with respiratory-chain-deficient dopamine neurons. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 2007;104(4):1325–30. doi:10.1073/pnas.0605208103
2. Aarsland D, Batzu L, Halliday GM, Geurtsen GJ, Ballard C, Ray Chaudhuri K, et al. Parkinson disease-associated cognitive impairment. Nature Reviews Disease Primers. 2021;7(1). doi:10.1038/s41572-021-00280-3
3. Maiti P, Manna J, Dunbar GL. Current understanding of the molecular mechanisms in parkinson’s disease: Targets for potential treatments. Translational Neurodegeneration. 2017;6(1). doi:10.1186/s40035-017-0099-z
4. Deuschl G, Paschen S, Witt K. Clinical outcome of deep brain stimulation for parkinson’s disease. Handbook of Clinical Neurology. 2013;107–28. doi:10.1016/b978-0-444-53497-2.00010-3
5. Heo J-H, Lee K-M, Paek SH, Kim M-J, Lee J-Y, Kim J-Y, et al. The effects of bilateral subthalamic nucleus deep brain stimulation (STN DBS) on cognition in parkinson disease. Journal of the Neurological Sciences. 2008;273(1–2):19–24. doi:10.1016/j.jns.2008.06.010
6. Jakobs M, Fomenko A, Lozano AM, Kiening KL. Cellular, molecular, and clinical mechanisms of action of deep brain stimulation—a systematic review on established indications and outlook on future developments. EMBO Molecular Medicine. 2019;11(4). doi:10.15252/emmm.201809575
7. Kim Y, McGee S, Czeczor JK, Walker AJ, Kale RP, Kouzani AZ, et al. Nucleus accumbens deep-brain stimulation efficacy in ACTH-pretreated rats: Alterations in mitochondrial function relate to antidepressant-like effects. Translational Psychiatry. 2016;6(6). doi:10.1038/tp.2016.84
8. Hsieh T-H, Kuo C-W, Hsieh K-H, Shieh M-J, Peng C-W, Chen Y-C, et al. Probiotics alleviate the progressive deterioration of motor functions in a mouse model of parkinson’s disease. Brain Sciences. 2020;10(4):206. doi:10.3390/brainsci10040206
9. Leger M, Quiedeville A, Bouet V, Haelewyn B, Boulouard M, Schumann-Bard P, et al. Object recognition test in mice. Nature Protocols. 2013;8(12):2531–7. doi:10.1038/nprot.2013.155
10. Seibenhener ML, Wooten MC. Use of the open field maze to measure locomotor and anxiety-like behavior in mice. Journal of Visualized Experiments. 2015;(96). doi:10.3791/52434-v
11. Deacon RM, Rawlins JN. T-maze alternation in the rodent. Nature Protocols. 2006;1(1):7–12. doi:10.1038/nprot.2006.2
12. Ben-Shaul Y. OptiMouse: A comprehensive open source program for reliable detection and analysis of mouse body and nose positions. BMC Biology. 2017;15(1). doi:10.1186/s12915-017-0377-3
13. Papp EA, Leergaard TB, Calabrese E, Johnson GA, Bjaalie JG. Waxholm Space Atlas of the Sprague Dawley Rat Brain. NeuroImage. 2014;97:374–86. doi:10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.04.001
14. Lai J-H, Chen K-Y, Wu JC-C, Olson L, Brené S, Huang C-Z, et al. Voluntary exercise delays progressive deterioration of markers of metabolism and behavior in a mouse model of parkinson’s disease. Brain Research. 2019;1720:146301. doi:10.1016/j.brainres.2019.146301
15. Luigjes J, van den Brink W, Feenstra M, van den Munckhof P, Schuurman PR, Schippers R, et al. Deep Brain Stimulation in addiction: A review of potential brain targets. Molecular Psychiatry. 2011;17(6):572–83. doi:10.1038/mp.2011.114
16. Nauczyciel C, Robic S, Dondaine T, Verin M, Robert G, Drapier D, et al. The nucleus accumbens: A target for deep brain stimulation in resistant major depressive disorder. Journal of Molecular Psychiatry. 2013;1(1). doi:10.1186/2049-9256-1-17
Figure 1. Experimental design. (A) Four groups, the WT group, Mito-Sham group, Mito-NAc-DBS group, and Mito-STN-DBS group, were conducted with bilateral probes implantations, behavioral tasks, MRI scan, and bioenergetic analysis. (N = 5, each group) (B) A T2-weighted image overlaid with a mouse brain atlas showed the tracks of the neural probes implanted into the bilateral NAc and STN. (C) ROIs include M1 (purple), mPFC (dark green), NAc (red), vHIPP (blue), VTA (light green), and STN (yellow).
Figure 2. Behavioral tasks. (A) Tracks represent the route of the mouse, which showed declined moving distance in the Mito-Sham group, and both DBS treatments may increase locomotor activity. (red square, inner zone region) (B) In the NOR test, the Mito-Sham group showed a lower PI value than the WT group. After DBS, NAc-DBS performed a higher PI value than STN-DBS (red circle, familiar object; green square, novel object). (C) NAc-DBS showed a higher correct ratio than STN-DBS, recovering cognitive function. *: p < 0.05, **: p < 0.01
Figure 3. rsfMRI analysis. (A) The cross-correlation maps of each ROIs with whole brain voxels. (B) The Mito-Sham group showed decreased FC than the WT group. After NAc-DBS and STN-DBS, FC showed significant restoration compared with the Mito-Sham group. NAc-DBS showed higher FC values than STN-DBS *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01
Figure 4. Bioenergetic analysis. (A) The Mito-Sham group showed lower OCR levels in ROIs than the WT group. Increased OCR level was found after NAc-DBS compared with the Mito-Sham group. (B) The Mito-Sham group showed decreased ECAR levels compared to the WT, the Mito-NAc-DBS group, and the Mito-STN-DBS group. *: p < 0.05; **: p < 0.01