Yan Mengnan1, Wang Yi Ting1, Li Jian1, Zhang Yan Ling1, Li Jin Qin1, Tian Bo1, Chen Bing1, and Xiong Yu Hui2
1Radiology, General Hospital of Ningxia Medical University, Yinchuan, China, 2MR Research, GE HealthCare MR Research, Beijing, China, Beijing, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Epilepsy, Arterial spin labelling, Automatic Subregion Segmentation
Motivation: Evaluating the hippocampal volume and perfusion level is important in the diagnosis of hippocampal sclerosis (HS). However, further observation at the subregion level is difficult.
Goal(s): To investigate the alterations in hippocampal subregion volume and blood flow in HS patients with an automatic segmentation procedure.
Approach: T1-MPRAGE and 3D-pCASL images were automatically segmented to quantify the hippocampal subregion volume and blood flow. The diagnostic performance of these subregion quantitative metrics in HS were statistically analyzed.
Results: The volume (VCA1) and blood flow (CBFCA1) of CA1 region are independent factors in diagnosing HS. The combination of VCA1 and CBFCA1 has the highest diagnostic performance.
Impact: The combination of
automatic segmentation and arterial spin labeling offers a quantitative imaging
foundation for diagnosing hippocampal sclerosis at the subregion level. This
scheme can also be applied to other MR techniques to improve the diagnostic
effectiveness in hippocampal research.
Introduction
Mesial temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal
sclerosis (HS) can be alleviated or even eliminated through surgery [1].
MRI plays a crucial role in the preoperative assessment of epileptogenic
lesions [2]. Previous studies have shown that HS can cause a
decrease in hippocampal volume and CBF on the affected side [3,4]. In
view of the pathological and clinical correlation of hippocampal sclerosis
subregions [5,6], it is very important to develop MRI to assess the
condition of hippocampal subregions. However, due to the small spatial scale of
hippocampal subregions, past MR studies were often limited to the level of the
overall hippocampus. In contrast, automatic segmentation techniques that has
been evolving in recent years is more accurate and efficient than manual
delineation. This study utilizes subregion automatic segmentation and 3D pseudo-continuous
arterial spin labeling (pCASL) technology to quantify the changes in
hippocampal subregion volume and blood flow in HS patients. Additionally, we aim
to evaluate the diagnostic performance of subregion quantitative metrics and
provide a solid imaging foundation for the subregional diagnosis of HS.Methods
Participants
This study was approved by the Ethics Review
Committee of our institution. The case group
consisted of 72 patients diagnosed with unilateral mesial temporal lobe
epilepsy and hippocampal sclerosis, meanwhile 60 healthy individuals were recruited
as the control group. There were no statistically significant differences in
age and gender between the two groups (age: t=0.634, P=0.527; gender:χ 2=0.367,
P=0.545). The detailed inclusion and exclusion criteria were shown in
Figure 1.
Data acquisition
All participants were scanned after obtaining written informed
consent. All MR examinations were performed on a 3.0T MR scanner (SIGNATM
Architect, GE Healthcare, Milwaukee WI, USA) equipped with a 48-channel head
coil. The main scan parameters were listed in Table 1.
Image post-processing
The automatic
segmentation of hippocampal subregions was performed using FreeSurfer (V7.3.2, http://surfer.nmr.mgh.harvard.edu/). The detailed steps were shown in
Figure 2. The segmentation process involved a combination of 39 in-vivo T1-weighted
MRI datasets with 1mm isotropic voxels and 15 ex-vivo MRI datasets with 0.1-0.2
mm isotropic resolution [7, 8]. Bayesian probability was employed to
synthesize a hippocampal structure calculation map [9]. The
resulting segmentation automatically divided the bilateral hippocampus into
subregions such as subiculum (Sub), CA1, CA2-3, CA4, dentate gyrus granule cell
layer (GC-DG), and others. The volume data for the subregion can be
automatically obtained in the generated .stats folder. The CBF value of the
hippocampal subregion is measured fully automatically using ITK-SNAP 4.0. The
subregions segmented by the MATLAB self-written program are mapped onto the CBF
quantitative map. The CBF values are obtained in the Volumes and Statistics.
Statistical analysis
SPSS (V26.0, IBM Corporation, Armonk, NY, USA) was used to conduct an
independent-samples t-test of variance to compare the subregion volumes and CBF
values between the control and the case group. Subregion metrics that showed
statistical significance were further utilized in the multi-factor logistic
regression analysis using MedCalc (V20.11.5, MedCalc,
Ostend, Belgium). Independent subregion metrics for diagnosing HS were
identified and their receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were
plotted. The area under the curves (AUCs) were measured and compared using the
Delong test, with P-value<0.05 considered to be statistically
significant.Results
Statistical analysis revealed significant differences in subregion
volumes and CBF values between the control and the case group (P<0.001).
Qualitative analysis showed that VCA1, CBFSub, and CBFCA1
were most significantly reduced.
Multifactor logistic stepwise regression analysis was conducted on
the variables with statistically significant differences in the affected side
groups mentioned above. The analysis revealed that VCA1
and CBFCA1 are independent factors for diagnosing HS at the
subregion level. The combination of VCA1 and CBFCA1
resulted in a higher AUC (0.904) in diagnosing HS than V total (0.904), CBF
total (0.736), VCA1 (0.854) or CBFCA1 (0.793) alone. The difference was
statistically significant (V total: Z=2.463, CBF total: Z=4.938, VCA1: Z=2.514,CBFCA1: Z=3.319;all P<0.05). Please refer to Table 2 and
Figure 3 for details.Discussion
The diagnostic efficiency of HS can be improved with the use of
automatic partition segmentation technology. VCA1 and CBFCA1 are independent
factors for diagnosing HS at the subregion level. Previous studies by STAALDUINEN
[10] et al. have highlighted that the CA1 area is particularly
sensitive to hypoxia, often referred to as a "vulnerable" area. The combined diagnosis of HS is more efficient than a single
parameter. Conclusion
Automatic subregion segmentation can help to realize the
quantitative analysis of hippocampal subregion volume and blood flow based on
MR. The combination of specific subregion metrics (VCA1 and CBFCA1)
may be potential image bio-markers in diagnosing HS at subregion level.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
[1] Yoganathan K, Malek N,
Torzillo E, et al. Neurological update: structural and functional imaging in
epilepsy surgery[J]. Journal of Neurology, 2023, 270(5): 2798-2808.
[2] Algahtany M, Abdrabou A,
Elhaddad A, et al. Advances in brain imaging techniques for patients with
intractable epilepsy[J]. Frontiers in Neuroscience, 2021, 15: 699123.
[3] Mittal A, Singh Dhanota
DP, Saggar K, et al. Role of interictal arterial spin labeling magnetic
resonance perfusion in mesial temporal lobe epilepsy [J]. Ann Indian Acad
Neurol. 2021;24(4):495-500.
[4] Riederer F, Seiger R,
Lanzenberger R, et al. Automated volumetry of hippocampal subfields in temporal
lobe epilepsy [J]. Epilepsy Res. 2021;175:106692.
[5] Mizutani M, Sone D, Sano T, et al. Histopathological validation
and clinical correlates of hippocampal subfield volumetry based on T2-weighted
MRI in temporal lobe epilepsy with hippocampal sclerosis[J]. Epilepsy Res.
2021; 177:106759.
[6] Menzler K, Hamer HM, Mross P, et al. Validation of automatic MRI
hippocampal subfield segmentation by histopathological evaluation in patients
with temporal lobe epilepsy [J]. Seizure. 2021; 87:94-102.
[7] Sämann P G, Iglesias J E,
Gutman B, et al. FreeSurfer‐based segmentation of hippocampal subfields: A review of methods and
applications, with a novel quality control procedure for ENIGMA studies and
other collaborative efforts[J]. Human brain map**, 2022, 43(1): 207-233.
[8] Park Y W, Choi Y S, Kim S
E, et al. Radiomics features of hippocampal regions in
magnetic resonance imaging can differentiate medial temporal lobe epilepsy
patients from healthy controls[J]. Scientific reports, 2020, 10(1): 19567.
[9] Iglesias J E, Augustinack
J C, Nguyen K, et al. A computational atlas of the hippocampal formation using
ex vivo, ultra-high resolution MRI: application to adaptive segmentation of in
vivo MRI[J]. Neuroimage, 2015, 115: 117-137.
[10] Van Staalduinen E K,
Zeineh M M. Medial temporal lobe anatomy[J]. Neuroimaging Clinics, 2022, 32(3):
475-489.