Keywords: Multiple Sclerosis, Multiple Sclerosis
Motivation: Relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) induces widespread changes in white matter (WM), affecting crucial functions. This novel longitudinal study investigates these alterations using advanced MRI, potentiating improved diagnosis and treatment.
Goal(s): To investigate differences in WM microstructure on a network level between RRMS and healthy controls (HCs) over two years.
Approach: Advanced MRI (diffusion-weighted imaging and tractography) was used in a network-based analysis of WM tracts, comparing RRMS to HCs.
Results: Our findings reveal widespread WM disparities in RRMS. We identified network differences between RRMS and HCs, offering valuable insights into RRMS pathophysiology and potential remyelination during disease-modifying treatments.
Impact: This novel study reveals widespread white matter differences in relapse-remitting multiple sclerosis (RRMS) patients, providing crucial insights into RRMS pathophysiology. It highlights potential remyelination during treatment, offering promise for improved diagnosis and therapy.
The authors acknowledge the facilities and scientific and technical assistance of the National Imaging Facility, a National Collaborative Research Infrastructure Strategy (NCRIS) capability, at the Hunter Medical Research Institute Imaging Centre, University of Newcastle.
1. Strik M, Cofré Lizama LE, Shanahan CJ, et al. Axonal loss in major sensorimotor tracts is associated with impaired motor performance in minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients. Brain Commun 2021;3(2):fcab032.
2. Aung WY, Mar S, Benzinger TL. Diffusion tensor MRI as a biomarker in axonal and myelin damage. Imaging in medicine 2013;5(5):427.
3. Lipp I, Parker GD, Tallantyre EC, et al. Tractography in the presence of multiple sclerosis lesions. Neuroimage 2020;209:116471.
4. Kern KC, Sarcona J, Montag M, Giesser BS, Sicotte NL. Corpus callosal diffusivity predicts motor impairment in relapsing–remitting multiple sclerosis: a TBSS and tractography study. Neuroimage 2011;55(3):1169-1177.
5. Tournier JD, Calamante F, Connelly A. Improved probabilistic streamlines tractography by 2nd order integration over fibre orientation distributions. Proceedings of the international society for magnetic resonance in medicine. Volume 1670: Ismrm; 2010.
6. Serin E, Zalesky A, Matory A, Walter H, Kruschwitz JD. NBS-Predict: A prediction-based extension of the network-based statistic. NeuroImage 2021;244:118625.
7. Zalesky A, Fornito A, Bullmore ET. Network-based statistic: identifying differences in brain networks. Neuroimage 2010;53(4):1197-1207.
8. Smith SM, Nichols TE. Threshold-free cluster enhancement: addressing problems of smoothing, threshold dependence and localisation in cluster inference. Neuroimage 2009;44(1):83-98.
9. Tournier J-D, Smith R, Raffelt D, et al. MRtrix3: A fast, flexible and open software framework for medical image processing and visualisation. Neuroimage 2019;202:116137.
10. Rolls ET, Huang C-C, Lin C-P, Feng J, Joliot M. Automated anatomical labelling atlas 3. Neuroimage 2020;206:116189.
11. Fuster JM. Frontal lobe and cognitive development. Journal of neurocytology 2002;31(3-5):373-385.
12. Morton SM, Bastian AJ. Cerebellar control of balance and locomotion. The neuroscientist 2004;10(3):247-259.
13. Gogolla N. The insular cortex. Current Biology 2017;27(12):R580-R586.
14. Cavanna AE, Trimble MR. The precuneus: a review of its functional anatomy and behavioural correlates. Brain 2006;129(3):564-583.
15. Shu N, Liu Y, Li K, et al. Diffusion tensor tractography reveals disrupted topological efficiency in white matter structural networks in multiple sclerosis. Cerebral cortex 2011;21(11):2565-2577.
16. Charalambous T, Tur C, Prados F, et al. Structural network disruption markers explain disability in multiple sclerosis. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry 2019;90(2):219-226.
Figure 3. NBS results of HCs vs. pw-RRMS at 2-year follow-up. (A) Coronal view of significant network. (B) Sagittal view of significant network. (C) Axial view of significant network. (D) 3D rotated view of significant network. Nodes in orange are located according to their centroid stereotaxic MNI coordinates, scaled in size by the number of connections (nodal degree); binary (unweighted) connections are shown in blue.
Figure 4. NBS results of longitudinal contrast within pw-RRMS (fibre density network RRMS2-YFU vs. RRMSBL). (A) Coronal view of significant network. (B) Sagittal view of significant network. (C) Axial view of significant network. (D) 3D rotated view of significant network. Nodes in orange are located according to their centroid stereotaxic MNI coordinates, scaled in size by the number of connections (nodal degree); binary (unweighted) connections are shown in blue.
Table 1. Mean demographic scores and disease-related variables for pw-RRMS as combined and separated disease-modifying therapies (DMTs) subgroups (b-IFN/GA, fingolimod and DMF) and HCs at BL and 2-YFU.