2915

Correction of inhaled volume in 19F gas wash-in MRI for improved lung ventilation assessment
Julienne Scheller1,2, Marcel Gutberlet1,2, Arnd Jonathan Obert3, Robin Aaron Müller1,2, Mark Greer4, Filip Klimeš1,2, Frank Wacker1,2, and Jens Vogel-Claussen1,2
1Institute of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany, 2Biomedical Research in Endstage and Obstructive Lung Disease Hannover (BREATH), German Center for Lung Research (DZL), Hannover, Germany, 3Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 4Department for Respiratory Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany

Synopsis

Keywords: Lung, Lung

Motivation: In 19F MR pulmonary ventilation imaging, variations in inspiratory gas volumes can compromise the evaluation of dynamic ventilation parameters.

Goal(s): To account for these variations, a correction of the inhaled volumes (CIV) can be applied during post-processing.

Approach: This study examined the repeatability of dynamic ventilation parameters and the correlation with spirometric lung function testing with and without CIV in 24 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Results: Using CIV increases the correlation of all assessed ventilation parameters with spirometry as well as their repeatability in terms of intraclass correlation coefficient and coefficient of variation between different scans.

Impact: The increased repeatability and stronger correlation with spirometry suggest that the implementation of CIV can improve the evaluation of the pulmonary gas wash-in process retrospectively, without requiring additional MR scans or changes in the experimental procedure.

Introduction

Perfluoropropane (C3F8), due to its high inertness and low solubility in water and blood1, enables detailed measurement of 19F gas wash-in dynamics over consecutive breath-holds2,3. Since parameters deduced from dynamic gas imaging strongly depend on consistent volumes of inspired gas, variations in inhaled gas volumes can impair the accuracy and inter-scan repeatability of the evaluated parameters. A previous study showed an increase in repeatability and correlation with spirometric measurements when limiting the inhaled gas volumes experimentally4. However, the results strongly rely on the patient’s compliance and the volume control may reduce the patient's comfort and requires an advanced experimental setup. This study investigates a retrospective correction of the inhaled volumes (CIV), without restricting the patients breathing and modifications in the experimental procedure.

Methods

24 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) with different severity (Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Disease (GOLD) stages5: I (4 patients), II (12 patients) and III (8 patients)) underwent lung function testing and 19F MRI (1.5T, MAGNETOM Avanto, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) on the same day, followed by a second 19F MR scan after a maximum of 7 days. 19F imaging was performed with a transmit birdcage coil and a 16-channel phased-array receive coil (Rapid Biomedical, Rimpar, Germany). A 3D spoiled gradient echo sequence with golden-angle stack of stars sampling with the following parameters was used: TE 2.1ms, TR 4.9ms, flip angle 35°, FOV 400x400x400mm3, matrix size 64x64x16, 5/8 partial Fourier along the partition dimension and pixel bandwidth 345Hz/pixel. For the gas wash-in, the patients inhaled a mixture of 79% C3F8 and 21% O2 for eight consecutive breaths, with a 19F scan in each breath-hold (duration: 6.3s) where all inspired volumes were measured using pneumotachometers (TSD117A-MRI, BIOPAC Systems, Goleta, CA). The images were reconstructed using the parallel imaging and compressed sensing algorithm (PICS) of the BART toolbox6. The eight scans were reconstructed regularizing the total variation in the time domain (λ = 0.01) and applying local low rank regularization in image and time domain (λ = 0.01). Wash-in (WI) and fractional ventilation (FV) maps were generated by fitting the signal of each voxel to the respective mono-exponential model:
$$
I(t) \propto (1-exp(- \frac{t}{WI})) \qquad I(t) \propto (1-(1-FV)^t),
$$
where t represents the number of the respective breath-hold. CIV was implemented by replacing each timepoint with the ratio of the actually inhaled volume to the mean of all inhaled volumes. This adjustment shifts the timepoints along the signal curve, simulating a consistent volume for each breath-hold. A graphical representation of the method can be found in Figure 1. The assessed parameters are the median of the derived wash-in time constants (WI median), the interquartile range of the wash-in time constants (WI IQR) and the ventilated volume percentage (WI VVP), defined as the percentage of voxels with wash-in time constants <= WI median+3 breaths, the median of the fractional ventilation maps (FV median) and the interquartile range of the fractional ventilation (FV IQR).

Results

The Pearson correlation coefficient (r) of the ventilation parameters with the predicted forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1%pred) increased with CIV, which is shown in Figure 2. For FV median, r increased from 0.63 without CIV to 0.70 with CIV; for FV IQR, from 0.17 to 0.24; for WI median, from -0.52 to -0.72; for WI IQR, from -0.28 to -0.59; and for WI VVP, from 0.59 to 0.64. As displayed in Figure 3, the coefficient of variation (COV) of FV median, WI median and WI IQR was significantly reduced with CIV (all p<0.045). The intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC) with CIV exceeded the ICC without CIV for all assessed parameters, as shown in Table 1. Figure 4 shows representative fractional ventilation and wash-in maps of the first and second scan with and without CIV.

Discussion

The presented results show an increased correlation of ventilation parameters with FEV1%pred and an improved repeatability. This suggests that the proposed method may provide a more accurate assessment of dynamic ventilation parameters. However, CIV is not able to correct a varying diaphragm position due to variations in inhaled gas volumes, which may lead to inaccurate measurements in the lower parts of the lung.

Conclusion

The CIV is a retrospective correction which is simple in implementation and can achieve an increased correlation as well as increased inter-scan repeatability of dynamic ventilation parameters in 19F gas wash-in MRI. Since CIV is implemented in the post-processing, it can be applied in the evaluation of existing data and without altering the experimental setup, as long as the inhaled gas volumes were measured.

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the German Center for Lung Research (DZL). The authors would like to express their gratitude to the radiographers Frank Schröder and Melanie Pfeifer from the Department of Radiology for their support with the MR measurements and patient care.

References

  1. Charles HC, Moon RE, MacIntyre NR, et al. Cardio-respiratory tolerability of perfluoropropane-enhanced MRI of pulmonary ventilation. In: American Thoracic Society International Conference. 2015:A3509.
  2. Schreiber WG, Eberle B, Laukemer‐Ostendorf S, et al. Dynamic 19F‐MRI of pulmonary ventilation using sulfur hexafluoride (SF6) gas. Magn Reson Med An Off J Int Soc Magn Reson Med. 2001;45(4):605-613.
  3. Gutberlet M, Kaireit TF, Voskrebenzev A, et al. Free-breathing Dynamic (19)F Gas MR Imaging for Mapping of Regional Lung Ventilation in Patients with COPD. Radiology. 2018;286(3):1040-1051.
  4. Obert AJ, Kern AL, Gutberlet M, et al. Volume-Controlled 19F MR Ventilation Imaging of Fluorinated Gas. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2023;57(4):1114-1128.
  5. Rabe KF, Hurd S, Anzueto A, et al. Global strategy for the diagnosis, management, and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: GOLD executive summary. Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2007;176:532-555
  6. Uecker M, Ong F, Tamir JI, et al. Berkeley advanced reconstruction toolbox. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2015;23:2486.

Figures

Figure 1: On the left side a simulation of the uniform inhalation of gas volumes is displayed, resulting in a FV of 33% determined by the fitting model. On the right side, random values were added to these gas volumes, simulating irregular inhalation (dark blue points); the model fit for these results in a FV of 27.4% (error of 17.1%). Applying CIV on these points realigns them (green points) which results in a FV of 33.7% and thereby reducing the error to 2.1%.

Figure 2: Correlations of FEV1%pred with 19F MRI parameters: 1) FV median, 2) FV IQR, 3) WI median, 4) WI IQR and 5) WI VVP. On the left side the correlation plots without CIV are depicted and on the right side the correlation plots with CIV. In every case the data with CIV shows a stronger correlation with FEV1%pred than the data without CIV.

Coefficient of variation (COV) between the data without CIV (blue box) and with CIV (green box) for FV median and FV IQR (top row) and WI median, WI IQR and WI VVP (bottom row). Statistical significance is shown as a * (significant) or ns (not significant) at the top of each graph. The COV of FV median (10.6% to 9.9%), WI median (16.7% to 10.7%) and WI IQR (35.1% to 20.1%) shows a significant decrease with CIV.

Figure 4: FV and WI maps of two COPD patients (pat.1: FEV1%pred = 0.6 (GOLD II); pat.2: FEV1%pred = 0.37 (GOLD III). On the left side the first and second scan without CIV are shown and on the right side with CIV. For the scans without CIV the FV median was 36.6% in the first and 27.6% in the second scan. With CIV it was 28.9% in the first and 27.6% in the second scan. The WI median without CIV was 7.3 in the first and 15.5 in the second scan. With CIV it was 6.7 in the first and 8.1 in the second scan.

Table 1: Intraclass coefficient (ICC) for all imaging parameters without and with CIV. For every parameter the ICC increases with CIV.

Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 32 (2024)
2915
DOI: https://doi.org/10.58530/2024/2915