Mingyue Yang1, Siyao Du1, Ruimeng Zhao1, Yueluan Jiang2, Yang Song3, and Lina Zhang1
1The First Hospital of China Medical University, Shenyang, China, 2research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers, Beijing, China, 3research Collaboration Team, Siemens Healthineers, Shanghai, China
Synopsis
Keywords: IVIM, Cancer
Motivation: Intravoxel incoherent motion (IVIM) analysis gives information on diffusion and perfusion and may have a potential for tumor tissue characterization and distinguish the HER2 expression.
Goal(s): This work aims to cluster tumor subregions based on IVIM parameter maps and assess the optimal number of clusters and parameter of tumor subregions related to HER2 expression.
Approach: we used kmeans method to split the ROI into different sub-regions based on IVIM maps, and imaging features to diagnose HER-2 expression.
Results: We found the optimal number of clusters was 3, and F_Median in subregion 1, D_Median and F_Volume in subregion 2 strongly associated with HER2 expression.
Impact: These subregions
features are expected as a non-invasive way to obtain diffusion and
perfusion information, leading to the discovery of reliable imaging biomarkers
for guiding precision cancer therapy.
Introduction
HER-2 is also an important proto-oncogene, and the HER-2 positive
expression is closely related to early metastasis, recurrence, and prognosis1.
Accurate and non-invasive HER2 expression evaluation techniques are urgently
needed. HER2 positive tumors have higher microvascular density, cell density,
and intratumoral heterogeneity. Diffusion and perfusion MRI is often used for
tumor diagnosis and response assessment due to its sensitivity to relevant
tumor tissue characteristics. Diffusion MRI has the potential to probe
microstructural tissue properties such as tumor cellularity and membrane
integrity, whereas perfusion MRI can be used to evaluate the tumor vascularity.
IVIM has been proposed as a completely non-invasive way to obtain diffusion and
perfusion information using a single imaging sequence2. The purpose
of this study is to use IVIM parameter clustering to identify heterogeneous
tumor subregions, evaluate the optimal number of clusters and the correlation
between the parameters of each subregion and HER2 expression.Methods
133
women diagnosed with breast IDC by biopsy confirmed were examined with multiple
b valuediffusion‐weighted imaging at a 3T MRI scanner ((MAGNETOM Skyra, Siemens
Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) to obtain IVIM parameter maps. According to the
HER-2 status confirmed with immunohistochemistry results, all the patients were
divided into HER2-positive (n=37) and HER2-negative (n=96) groups. The whole
tumor’s volume was delineated based on a high b value images (b= 800s/mm2)
using a software ITK-SNAP (http://www.itksnap.org/). A T1
contrast-enhancement and T2WI images was referenced to improve the ROI delineation
accuracy. Then we used kmeans, a data-driven clustering method to split the ROI
into different sub-regions (k is the hyper-parameters) based on the D and F maps. Then we extracted the volume of
each sub-region and the first-order features of D and F by FAE(v 0.5.8), respectively.
Then we used these features to construct a logistical regression (LR) model to
diagnose the HER-2 expression. A Mann-Whitney U test and
ROC curve analysis were performed to recognize the features with significant
differences (p<0.05).Result
In the k=2 cluster
setting, the top three features were Volume (AUC=0.641), D_Entropy (AUC=0.635),
D_Uniformity (AUC=0.632) in subregion 1 significantly differed between
HER2-positive than negative tumors (all p<0.05). LR analysis showed only D_Entropy
was independently associated with HER2 expression.
In the k=3 cluster
setting, the top three features including F_Median in subregion 1 (AUC=0.743),
Volume (AUC=0.746) and D_Median (AUC=0.793) in subregion 2 had AUC of more than
0.700 (all p<0.05) and their combination achieved the highest AUC of 0.916
to distinguish between HER2-positive and negative tumors.
In the k=4 cluster
setting, the top three features were D_90Percentile in subregion 4 (AUC=0.694),
D_Mean in subregion 2 (AUC=0.680) and D_RootMeanSquared (AUC=0.679) in subregion
2, which significantly differed between two subgroups (all p<0.05). LR
analysis showed the combined performance of F_Maximum, D_InterquartileRange and
D_RobustMeanAbsoluteDeviation achieved the highest AUC of 0.809.
Thus, the optimal
number of clusters was 3, and the biological significance of F_Median in subregion
1, D_Median and Volume in subregion 2 can be explained as the median value of F
in the low perfusion/high diffusion subregion, the median value of D and volume
of the low perfusion/low diffusion subregion, respectively.Discussion
This study presents an IVIM‐based clustering that can be used to
identify tumor subregions based on the functional information contained in the
IVIM parameters. The results show that when applied to human breast cancer,
cluster maps displayed a strong correlation with HER2-based tumor aggressiveness. The
IVIM‐based approach does not require an intravenous injection of a contrast
agent and is completely noninvasive. In the
current result of three clustering, HER2-positive tumors appear to have more
neovascularization in the low perfusion/high diffusion subregion, lower volume
and higher cell density in the low perfusion/low diffusion subregion, which is
consistent with the characteristics of higher aggressiveness3. The
combined efficacy of multiple parameters reached AUC=0.916, which is higher
than the AUC=0.629 reported in previous studies in distinguishing HER2 positive
and negative tumors4. This may be due to the combination of
diffusion (D) and perfusion (F) features positioning the more malignant tumor
subregions, which corresponds to the hot spots promoting angiogenesis and cell
proliferation of HER2. IVIM based tumor subregions visualize tumor spatial
heterogeneity, rather than averaging the parameter values of the entire tumor
without the potential loss of important information. Ideally, the method should
capture the information on heterogeneity contained in the images in a compact
way, but also provide a comprehensible interpretation.Conclusion
The IVIM clustering tumor subregion can distinguish the HER2 expression
in breast cancers, and the combination of D and F under the three clustering achieved
the optimal diagnostic performance with interpretability.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1. information via multimodal deep learning.
Comput Struct Biotechnol J. 2021 D Yang J, Ju J, Guo L, Ji B, Shi S, Yang Z,
Gao S, Yuan X, Tian G, Liang Y, Yuan P. Prediction of HER2-positive breast
cancer recurrence and metastasis risk from histopathological images and
clinical ec 23;20:333-342. doi: 10.1016/j.csbj.2021.12.028. PMID: 35035786;
PMCID: PMC8733169.
2. Arian A, Seyed-Kolbadi FZ, Yaghoobpoor S,
Ghorani H, Saghazadeh A, Ghadimi DJ. Diagnostic accuracy of intravoxel
incoherent motion (IVIM) and dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) MRI to
differentiate benign from malignant breast lesions: A systematic review and
meta-analysis. Eur J Radiol. 2023 Oct;167:111051. doi:
10.1016/j.ejrad.2023.111051. Epub 2023 Aug 16. PMID: 37632999.
3. Kim JJ, Kim JY, Suh HB, Hwangbo L, Lee NK,
Kim S, Lee JW, Choo KS, Nam KJ, Kang T, Park H. Characterization of breast
cancer subtypes based on quantitative assessment of intratumoral heterogeneity
using dynamic contrast-enhanced and diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance
imaging. Eur Radiol. 2022 Feb;32(2):822-833. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-08166-4.
Epub 2021 Aug 4. PMID: 34345946.
4. You C, Li J, Zhi W, Chen Y, Yang W, Gu Y, Peng
W. The volumetric-tumour histogram-based analysis of intravoxel incoherent
motion and non-Gaussian diffusion MRI: association with prognostic factors in
HER2-positive breast cancer. J Transl Med. 2019 Jul 2;17(1):182. doi:
10.1186/s12967-019-1911-6. PMID: 31262334; PMCID: PMC6604303.