Shohei Inui1, Tsuyoshi Ueyama2, Yuichi Suzuki2, Tetsuya Wakayama3, and Osamu Abe1
1Radiology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo, Japan, 2Radiology, The University of Tokyo Hospital, Tokyo, Japan, 3GE HealthCare, Tokyo, Japan
Synopsis
Keywords: DWI/DTI/DKI, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Motivation: Novel Multidimensional diffusion encoding (MDE) technique, diffusional variance decomposition (DIVIDE), may provide more detailed insights into tissue microstructure.
Goal(s): To evaluate the feasibility of DIVIDE imaging for human brain.
Approach: Ten healthy-subjects underwent MDE (2D-EPI sequence with 29 linear and 26 spherical b-tensors) twice using 3T-MRI. Regional values of 20 ROIs was extracted for 10 DIVIDE metrics. Coefficient of variation (CV) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC) were calculated.
Results: Intra-subject CV was less than 5% in almost all regional metrics. Intra-subject CV was lower than that of inter-subject CV in all regional metrics. ICC showed almost perfect agreements for almost all regional metrics.
Impact: Recently developed MDE technique, diffusional variance
decomposition (DIVIDE), may be reliably used for measuring diffusion metrics with a potential to provide more detailed insights into tissue
microstructure in complex tissues, such as crossing or kissing fiber
configurations in the brain.
Background: Conventional
diffusion MRI employs diffusion encoding along three orthogonal directions in
3D space using a set of motion probing gradients. Multidimensional diffusion
encoding (MDE) extends this concept by encoding diffusion by using
non-orthogonal gradient directions or additional gradient directions beyond the
three spatial dimensions. Recently developed MDE technique, diffusional
variance decomposition (DIVIDE), may provide more detailed insights into tissue
microstructure by capturing diffusion anisotropy and heterogeneity in a more
comprehensive manner in complex tissue environments, such as crossing or
kissing fiber configurations in the brain. This study aimed to evaluate the
feasibility of the DIVIDE imaging for the human brain.
Materials and Methods: Ten healthy subjects (8 men; mean age 29 years, range 23-37 years) were included in this study. During March 2021 to June 2021, whole-brain
diffusion-weighted imaging was performed using MDE twice with an interval of
more than 1 week using a 3T scanner with a 48-channel head coil. The DIVIDE
sequence is a modification of the spin-echo 2D echo-planar imaging (EPI). Imaging parameters were as follows: TR/TE = 5200/96.6 ms, FA =
90°, 60 slices without gaps, FOV = 256×256 mm2, spatial resolution = 2 × 2 × 2.5 mm2, bandwidth = 3906 Hz/pixel, parallel imaging factor =
2 (anterior-posterior), partial-Fourier
factor = 0.75 . MDE encoding was performed with 29 linear and 26 spherical b-tensors in an
interleaved fashion using optimized gradient waveforms for b =
100, 1000, 2000 s/mm2 with 4, 10, 15 directions, respectively, for
linear encodings and with 6, 10, 10 directions,
respectively, for spherical encodings, giving a total scan time about 5 min. Automated extraction
of 20
major regions of interest (ROI) based on JHU
DTI-based white-matter atlas was performed to obtain DIVIDE metrics including
fractional anisotropy (FA), mean diffusivity (MD), axial diffusivity (AD),
radial diffusivity (RD), anisotropic mean kurtosis (MKA), isotropic
mean kurtosis (MKI), total mean kurtosis (MKT), and
microscopic fractional anisotropy (μFA).
The coefficient of variation (CV) and interclass correlation coefficient (ICC)
were calculated to assess the intra-subject (scan-rescan) and inter-subject
reproducibilities of the regional DIVIDE metrics.
Results: The intra-subject CV was less than 5% in 20/20 ROIs
for FA, 20/20 for MD, 20/20 for AD, 19/20 for RD, 18/20 for MKA,
13/20 for MKI, 19/20 for MKT,
20/20 for μFA. The
intra-subject CV was lower than that of inter-subject CV in all the metrics of
all the regions. The ICC showed almost perfect agreements for all of the
regional values of FA, MD, AD, RD, MKA, MKT, μFA. The ICC showed substantial to almost
perfect agreement in 17/20 ROIs for MKI.
Conclusion:
Scan-rescan repeatability was acceptable in
all the metrics. DIVIDE may be reliably used for measuring
diffusion metrics. Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1.Lampinen B, Szczepankiewicz F,
Mårtensson J, et al. Neurite density imaging versus imaging of microscopic
anisotropy in diffusion MRI: A model comparison using spherical tensor
encoding. Neuroimage. 2017;147:517-531.
2.Westin
CF, Knutsson H, Pasternak O, et al. Q-space trajectory imaging for
multidimensional diffusion MRI of the human brain. Neuroimage. 2016;135:345-62.
3.Li S,
Zheng Y, Sun W, et al. Glioma grading, molecular feature classification, and
microstructural characterization using MR diffusional variance decomposition
(DIVIDE) imaging. Eur Radiol.
2021;31:8197-8207.
4.Szczepankiewicz F, Lasič S,
van Westen D,
et al., Quantification of microscopic diffusion anisotropy disentangles effects
of orientation dispersion from microstructure: applications in healthy
volunteers and in brain tumors. Neuroimage. 2015;104:241-52.
5.Lawrenz M, Brassen S, Finsterbusch J.
Microscopic diffusion anisotropy in the human brain: reproducibility, normal
values, and comparison with the fractional anisotropy. Neuroimage.
2015;109:283-97.