Wolfgang G Rehwald1,2, Jianing Pang3, Rafael Rojas2, Julie Swanson2, David Wendell2, Sherilyn Pirela2, Jeana Dement2, Igor Klem2, and Raymond Kim2
1Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Durham, NC, United States, 2Duke Cardiovascular MR Center, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States, 3Siemens Medical Solutions USA, Inc., Issaquah, WA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Artifacts, Cardiovascular, FIDDLE
Motivation: Imperfect breath holding and cardiac arrhythmia create chest wall and cardiac ghosting in conventional segmented dark-blood LGE images (FIDDLE) often rendering them non-clinical.
Goal(s): We aimed to apply compressed sensing ‘CS’ as the solution to this problem, to acquire FIDDLE images without ghosting, even in challenging patients.
Approach: CS can acquire multiple high-spatial and excellent-temporal resolution single shots that intrinsically never display ghosting artifacts. Sparsity is created along the shot dimension, enabling CS to reconstruct the generally not-so-sparse FIDDLE images. Single shot averaging further improves SNR.
Results: The CS FIDDLE images show high SNR and no ghosting. They should simplify clinical imaging.
Impact: The
CS FIDDLE method should improve clinical CMR image quality and alleviate the
need for repeated acquisitions due to poor breath holding. It also enables using
CS for the acquisition of single still-frame images with intrinsically higher
SNR.
Background
Compressed
Sensing (CS) is commonly used to significantly accelerate acquisition while
accepting variable reductions in image quality (IQ). Here we explored the
opposite approach for breath-held Flow Independent Dark Blood Delayed
Enhancement (FIDDLE), a black-blood LGE technique1. We applied CS for
IQ improvement of FIDDLE while keeping acquisition time, spatial and temporal
resolution identical to the conventional (CONV) segmented technique2.
Specifically, we aimed to eliminate the frequent ghosting (GHO) produced by
segmented interleaved reordering during imperfect breath holds or arrhythmia.
FIDDLE
combines a magnetization transfer and inversion recovery (MT-IR) preparation to
separate tissue from blood so that the magnetization of blood, myocardium, and
infarct are ordered from smallest to largest. In the phase sensitive IR (PSIR)
reconstructed FIDDLE image, the magnetization levels are mapped to a grey scale.
Blood as the smallest species is depicted black.Methods
In
30 CMR patients we acquired 35 CONV immediately followed by 35 prototype CS FIDDLE
data sets on a 3T clinical MR scanner (MAGNETOM Vida, *Siemens Healthineers AG,
Erlangen, Germany). Each breath-held acquisition consisted of 5 MT-IR shots of 49
lines alternating with 5 PSIR reference (REF) shots (256 x 245 matrix, 10 heartbeats). CONV employed
interleaved segmented reordering. Each CS MT-IR shot had a different variable
density incoherent sampling trajectory (IST). Each REF used the same IST as its
preceding MT-IR shot (Figure 1).
Each
CS MT-IR data set was reconstructed into a separate single shot image jointly with
the other MT-IR shots, to exploit sparsity in the shot dimension. The CS MT-IR
images were averaged (MT-IR AVG) to remove IST dependent artifacts and improve
SNR (Figure 2). An averaged reference (REF AVG) image was created from CS REF data
in the same manner.
We
implemented the PSIR reconstruction as MATLAB program (MathWorks, Natick, MA) and
compiled it into a chroot container, executed within the FIRE3
works-in-progress package* on the scanner for immediate image display. A coil
sensitivity and a phase map were calculated from the REF AVG image to create a
real-valued, coil-normalized FIDDLE image (Figure 2).
We
compared CONV and CS FIDDLE images for GHO (present/absent) by McNemar’s test. A
Wilcoxon signed-rank test assessed IQ (Likert scale 3-0, excellent, good,
moderate, nondiagnostic), subjective SNR (3-1, excellent, good, moderate), and
comparative rank (RANK, better, equivalent, worse). SNR was measured in blood
and myocardium of the MT-IR AVG images and compared between CONV and CS by a
two-tailed t-test. Results
27
short-axis (SAX) and 8 long-axis (LAX) images were acquired (13 infarcts total).
There were significantly fewer ghosting artifacts in CS FIDDLE vs CONV (0 vs 7,
p< 0.05). IQ was higher for CS FIDDLE compared to CONV (1.9±0.1 vs 1.4±0.1,
p< 0.05). RANK was significantly higher for CS FIDDLE (better 66%,
equivalent 34%, p< 0.05). Measured
SNR was significantly higher for the CS MT-IR AVG images in blood (CS 59.2±6.0
vs CONV 40.5±4.1, p < 0.0001) and myocardium (CS 25.5±2.9 vs CONV 19.3±2.4, p
< 0.001), but not in infarct (CS 82.4±23.2 vs CONV 58.9±10.5). Subjective SNR
was higher for CS FIDDLE compared to CONV (2.0±0.1 vs 1.3±0.1, p< 0.0001).
Figure
3 shows typical CONV and CS FIDDLE images. In the SAX views of patients 1 and 2,
ghosting is present in CONV (arrows), but absent in the CS FIDDLE images. Patient
1 has extensive enhancement in the septum, inferior wall, and apex. In patient
2, late enhancement in the anteroseptum and anterior wall is visualized with CS
FIDDLE, but it is obscured by ghosting in CONV FIDDLE. The CS FIDDLE images appear
cleaner, likely due to the increased SNR. In CS FIDDLE, the absence of
salt-and-pepper noise in the lungs and air is probably owed to the new coil
sensitivity calculation as part of our PSIR reconstruction.Conclusion
CS
FIDDLE images had significantly better IQ than CONV segmented images. Motion-induced
ghosting was substantially absent since it originates from k-space segmentation,
while CS FIDDLE uses single-shots. SNR was higher with CS FIDDLE, likely due to
the denoising feature of CS and the denser sampling of k-space center. Interestingly,
we utilized the acceleration afforded by CS to acquire multiple single shots,
thereby creating sparsity along the shot dimension, which in turn allowed applying
the CS technique to the generally not-so-sparse FIDDLE images.
A
potential next step is to perform a motion correction (MOCO4) of the
CS images prior to averaging, to account for residual motion during breath
holding. A free breathing version with higher IQ, better spatial and temporal resolution,
and higher SNR than possible with conventional averaged MOCO techniques4 will
also be investigated.References
1. Kim H, Rehwald, W, Kim R, et al. Dark-Blood Delayed Enhancement Cardiac Magnetic Resonance of Myocardial Infarction, J Am Coll Cardiol Img 2018;11:1758–69
2. Simonetti O, Kim R, et al. An Improved MR Imaging Technique for the Visualization of Myocardial Infarction. Radiology 2001; 218:215–223.
3. Chow K, Kellman P, Xue H. Prototyping Image Reconstruction and Analysis with FIRE. Proc. SCMR. Virtual Scientific Sessions; 2021. p. 838972.
4. Xue H, Shah S, Greiser A, et al. Motion Correction for Myocardial T1 Mapping Using Image Registration with Synthetic Image Estimation. Magn ResonMed 67:1644–1655, 2012.