Keywords: DWI/DTI/DKI, Rare disease, Immunoglobulin G4; IgG4-related kidney disease
Motivation: Clinical diagnosis and assessment of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4)-related disease is difficult. We explored whether diffusion kurtosis imaging (DKI) can resolve this difficulty.
Goal(s): To explore the feasibility of using DKI in the assessment of IgG4-related kidney disease (IgG4-RKD)
Approach: We measured the apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) and DKI-derived parameters of the renal parenchyma, cortex, and medulla, then analyzed correlations between quantitative image parameters and clinical indicators.
Results: DKI-derived quantitative parameters were correlated with clinical indicators and demonstrated feasibility in the assessment of IgG4-RKD.
Impact: The DKI technique can help to detect IgG4-RKD lesions. DKI-derived quantitative parameters can assess IgG4-RKD clinical activity and facilitate evaluation of IgG4-RKD prognosis.
1 T. Saeki, S. Nishi, N. Imai, et al. Clinicopathological characteristics of patients with IgG4-related tubulointerstitial nephritis. Kidney international. 2010; 78(10):1016-23.
2 M. Lanzillotta, G. Mancuso, E. Della-Torre. Advances in the diagnosis and management of IgG4 related disease. BMJ. 2020; 369m1067.
3 H. Ren, N. Mori, S. Sato, et al. American College of Rheumatology and the European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria for IgG4-related disease: an update for radiologists. Jpn J Radiol. 2022; 40(9):876-893.
4 M. Kawano, T. Saeki, Y. Ubara, et al. Recent Advances in IgG4-Related Kidney Disease. Mod Rheumatol. 2022.
5 M. Salvadori, A. Tsalouchos. Immunoglobulin G4-related kidney diseases: An updated review. World J Nephrol. 2018; 7(1):29-40.
6 N. Seo, J.H. Kim, J.H. Byun, et al. Immunoglobulin G4-Related Kidney Disease: A Comprehensive Pictorial Review of the Imaging Spectrum, Mimickers, and Clinicopathological Characteristics. Korean J Radiol. 2015; 16(5):1056-67.
7 J. Ling, H. Wang, W. Pan, et al. Clinical and imaging features of IgG4-related kidney disease. Abdom Radiol (NY). 2020; 45(6):1915-1921.
8 B. Kim, J.H. Kim, J.H. Byun, et al. IgG4-related kidney disease: MRI findings with emphasis on the usefulness of diffusion-weighted imaging. Eur J Radiol. 2014; 83(7):1057-1062.
9 Y. Liu, G.M. Zhang, X. Peng, et al. Diffusion kurtosis imaging as an imaging biomarker for predicting prognosis in chronic kidney disease patients. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 2022; 37(8):1451-1460.
10 Y. Liu, G.M. Zhang, X. Peng, et al. Diffusional kurtosis imaging in assessing renal function and pathology of IgA nephropathy: a preliminary clinical study. Clin Radiol. 2018; 73(9):818-826.
11 A.B. Rosenkrantz, A.R. Padhani, T.L. Chenevert, et al. Body diffusion kurtosis imaging: Basic principles, applications, and considerations for clinical practice. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015; 42(5):1190-202.
Figure 1 Representative images of IgG4-RKD lesions in a 66-year-old man. Multiple round lesions were evident in bilateral kidneys with hypo-intensity on T2WI (A) and hyperintensity on ultrahigh b-value images (b=1600 s/mm2) (B). The MK values of the lesions were increased (C); the MD and ADC values were decreased (D, E). The ultrahigh b-value images generated by DKI revealed more lesions than the results of T2WI.
Figure 2 Mean values of quantitative renal image parameters and interobserver consistency for each parameter
Figure 3 Comparison of ADC and various DKI parameters among renal parenchyma, cortex, and medulla. MK and ADC values did not significantly differ among renal cortex, renal parenchyma, and medulla. MD values were higher in renal cortex than in parenchyma or medulla. *p<0.05.
Figure 4 Scatterplots with regression lines showing correlations between clinical parameters and renal quantitative imaging parameters. MK_p: mean kurtosis in renal parenchyma; MD_p: mean diffusivity in renal parenchyma; ADC_p: apparent diffusion coefficient in renal parenchyma; MK_c: MK in renal cortex; MD_c: MD in renal cortex; ADC_c: ADC in renal cortex; ADC_m: ADC in renal medulla.
Figure 5 Comparison of lesion detection ability between DWI (b=800 s/mm2) and ultrahigh b-value images (b=1600 s/mm2) in a 60-year-old man. We found no abnormal lesions on T2WI (A), a suspicious locally increased signal on DWI (B), and a clearer patchy hyperintense signal on ultrahigh b-value images (C). The MK (D) value was slightly elevated, but the MD (E) and ADC (F) values were not significantly reduced.