Keywords: Susceptibility/QSM, Susceptibility, Gray Matter/ Ex-Vivo Applications
Motivation: Previous studies have demonstrated the correlations between iron and paramagnetic susceptibility and myelin and diamagnetic susceptibility. However, there has yet to be a quantitative layer-wise comparison with histology.
Goal(s): Our objective is to validate laminar structures of χ-separation against histology in V1.
Approach: In V1, we performed laminar profiling of χ-separation, iron-, and myelin histology. The profile was obtained by sampling points at 5% intervals along the cortical depth, oriented perpendicularly to the cortex.
Results: The cortical depth profile reveals that both χpara with iron histology and χdia with myelin staining exhibit similar profiles and peaks at the location of the Gennari line.
Impact: By comparing the cortical depth profile in the V1 region including the location of the Gennari line between χ-separation and histology, we have confirmed that χ-separation (χpara, χdia) accurately represents the quantitative amounts of iron and myelin with precision.
This work was supported by the Brain Korea 21 Plus Project in 2023.
This work has been supported by the National Research Foundation of Korea (NRF) grant funded by the Korea government (MSIT) (NRF-2021R1A2B5B03002783).
This work is supported by Institute of New Media and Communications (INMC), SNU
1. Shin, H.-G. et al. χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain. NeuroImage 240, 118371 (2021).
2. Kim, W. et al. χ-Separation Imaging for Diagnosis of Multiple Sclerosis versus Neuromyelitis Optica Spectrum Disorder. Radiology 307, e220941 (2023).
3. Lee, S., Shin, H.-G., Kim, M. & Lee, J. Depth-wise profiles of iron and myelin in the cortex and white matter using χ-separation: A preliminary study. NeuroImage 273, 120058 (2023).
4. Fukunaga, M. et al. Layer-specific variation of iron content in cerebral cortex as a source of MRI contrast. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. 107, 3834–3839 (2010).
5. Eickhoff, S. et al. High‐resolution MRI reflects myeloarchitecture and cytoarchitecture of human cerebral cortex. Hum. Brain Mapp. 24, 206–215 (2005).
6. Dymerska, B. et al. Phase unwrapping with a rapid opensource minimum spanning tree algorithm (ROMEO). Magn. Reson. Med. 85, 2294–2308 (2021).
7. Wu, B., Li, W., Guidon, A. & Liu, C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn. Reson. Med. 67, 137–147 (2012).
8. McGibney, G., and M. R. Smith. “An unbiased signal‐to‐noise ratio measure for magnetic resonance images.” Medical physics 20.4 (1993): 1077-1078.
9. McPhee, K. C. & Wilman, A. H. T2 quantification from only proton density and T2-weighted MRI by modelling actual refocusing angles.pdf. NeuroImage 118, 642–650 (2015).
10. Bouguer, Pierre (1729). Essai d’optique sur la gradation de la lumière [Optics essay on the attenuation of light] (in French). Paris, France: Claude Jombert. pp. 16–22.
11. Schleicher, A. et al. A stereological approach to human cortical architecture: identification and delineation of cortical areas. J. Chem. Neuroanat. 20, 31–47 (2000).
Fig. 1. Process of manual segmentation. Myelin staining was used to illustrate this process because the image contrast clearly showed the manual segmentation lines. a) V1 region is found in myelin stained image. b) The inner and outer cortex boundaries were manually segmented with reference to image contrast. c) Cortical depth profiles were drawn perpendicular to the cortex boundary created in b) and were evenly spaced. d) ninety equidistant points along the cortical depth profile lines were chosen as depth points, which were used to mask pixels.
Fig. 2. Segmented layers in χ-separation maps and histology. a) and b) The inner cortical boundary for χ-separation was extracted from χdia, where the inner cortical boundary was distinctly visible. The outer cortical boundary was obtained from χpara, where the outer cortical boundary was clearly visible. χdia and χpara share the same depth-wise pixel mask. c) For iron, there is area where four depth trajectories are not drawn due to an artifact in the middle. d) LFB myelin staining, with image contrast opposite to other modalities, was converted using the Beer-Bouguer-Lambert law.
Fig. 3. Comparison of laminar profiles of χdia and myelin histology. a) The laminar profile of myelin histology shows an intensity peak at 65% depth. b) The laminar profile of χdia also has a Gennari line peak at 65%. c) Both z-score normalized laminar profiles of myelin and χdia display increasing values as getting deeper and decrease until 75 to 80% depth and continue to rise until 100% depth. The mean Euclidean distance is 0.909 ± 0.143.
Fig. 4. Comparison of laminar profile of χdia and myelin histology. a) The laminar profile of iron histology shows an intensity peak at 65% depth. Standard error is relatively lower than in χpara vs. iron. b) The laminar profile of χpara also has a Gennari line peak at 65%. c) Both z-score normalized laminar profiles of χpara and iron display increasing values as getting deeper until 65% depth and decrease until 100% depth. The χpara vs. iron has a lower mean Euclidean Distance than the χdia vs. myelin, which means the laminar profiles of χpara vs. iron are more similar.