Hiroyuki Uetani1, Takeshi Nakaura1, Koya Iwashita1, Kosuke Morita2, Yuichi Yamashita3, Takumi Saito3, Kensei Matsuo2, and Toshinori Hirai1
1Diagnostic Radiology, Kumamoto university, Kumamoto, Japan, 2Central Radiology section, Kumamoto University Hospital, Kumamoto, Japan, 3MRI sales department, sales engineer group, Canon Medical Systems Corporation, Kawasaki, Japan
Synopsis
Keywords: AI/ML Image Reconstruction, Image Reconstruction, deep learning; internal auditory canal; high resolution T2-weighted imaging; super-resolution.
Motivation: There are no reports on the usefulness of high-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging (HR-3D T2WI) using super-resolution deep learning-based reconstruction (SR-DLR) technique.
Goal(s): We aimed to determine whether a novel SR-DLR technique can improve the image quality of HR-3D T2WI for assessing the IAC and inner ear.
Approach: We qualitatively assessed the image quality of HR-3D T2WI with and without SR-DLR for the visualization of detailed structures of the IAC and inner ear.
Results: SR-DLR was shown to significantly improve the image quality of HR-3D T2WI in visualizing nerves in the IAC and inner ear compared to conventional HR-3D T2WI without SR-DLR.
Impact: High-resolution
three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging with super-resolution deep learning-based
reconstruction can improve the visualization of detailed structures of the internal
auditory canal and inner ear without extended acquisition time.
INTRODUCTION
High-resolution three-dimensional T2-weighted imaging
(HR-3D T2WI) is commonly used to evaluate the internal auditory canal (IAC) and
inner ear in patients with sensorineural hearing loss and dizziness, but this
usually requires long acquisition times (1). To reduce acquisition time, many studies have
reported the usefulness of a parallel imaging technique (2) and compressed sensing technique (1,3). The disadvantages of this approach are a decrease
in signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) (4) or global ringing artifacts and blurring of fine
details (5,6), making it difficult to depict small structures at
high acceleration and denoising levels. Recently, the deep learning-based reconstruction
(DLR) technique has been applied for MRI noise reduction (7-9). Several super-resolution techniques using DLR for
MRI, called super-resolution DLR (SR-DLR), have emerged in recent years (10-12). A novel SR-DLR technique
using zero-padding interpolation (ZIP) for the matrix enhancement within
k-space and deep learning for noise and ringing artifact removal processing has
been developed and reported to be useful in brain diffusion-weighted imaging
(DWI)(13). To our knowledge, there are no reports on the
usefulness of the SR-DLR technique for HR-3D T2WI. We aimed to determine
whether the novel SR-DLR technique can improve the image quality of HR-3D T2WI for
assessing the IAC and inner ear.METHODS
This retrospective study included 13 patients (six
male, 64.1 ± 13.2 years) who underwent HR-3D T2WI using a 3T MRI system (Vantage
Centurian; CANON Medical Systems) for assessing sensorineural hearing loss,
dizziness, and IAC tumors. Scan parameters of HR-3D T2WI were as follows: TR/TE,
2200/227.5 ms; field of view, 180×180 mm; matrix, 320×320; slice thickness, 0.6
mm; parallel imaging factor, 3.0; and acquisition time, 3 min 45 sec. We
reconstructed HR-3D T2W images with SR-DLR (matrix size, 960×960) and without
SR-DLR (matrix size, 320×320). Figure 1 shows the reconstruction pipeline of
the SR-DLR technique (13). Two neuroradiologists evaluated the visualization
of the cochlea, vestibule, semicircular canal, anterior inferior cerebellar
artery (AICA) on axial images, nerves within the IAC (facial nerve, cochlear
nerve and superior and inferior vestibular nerve) on sagittal images, and
overall image quality of the two types of images using a 5-point scale (from grade
1 [unacceptable] to grade 5 [excellent]) (1). The median scores between images with and without
the SR-DLR were compared using the Wilcoxon signed-rank test.RESULTS
For the visualization
of the cochlea, semicircular canal, AICA, nerves within the IAC, and overall
image quality, the median score was significantly higher for images with SR-DLR
than images without SR-DLR (the cochlea, 5.0 [interquartile range, 5.0-5.0] vs
3.0 [3.0-4.0], P <0.01; semicircular canal, 5.0 [5.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0-4.0],
P < 0.01; AICA, 5.0 [5.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0-5.0], P = 0.018; IAC, 5.0
[5.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [3.75-4.0], P < 0.01 and overall image quality, 5.0
[5.0-5.0] vs 4.0 [4.0-4.0], P < 0.01).DISCUSSION
In our study, SR-DLR was shown to significantly
improve the image quality of HR-3D T2WI in visualizing nerves in the IAC and
inner ear structures compared to conventional HR-3D T2WI without SR-DLR. Our previous report suggested that SR-DLR was a useful
tool to improve the SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio in DWI (13). This SR-DLR method integrates a ZIP technique and
two types of DLR methods for noise reduction and ringing artifact removal to
achieve a 3-fold scaling rate. High spatial resolution and noise reduction by
the SR-DLR technique must have contributed to our results.CONCLUSION
The novel SR-DLR technique can enhance the image
quality of HR-3D T2WI for assessing detailed structures in the IAC and inner
ear.Acknowledgements
noneReferences
1. Yuhasz M, Hoch MJ,
Hagiwara M, et al. Accelerated Internal Auditory Canal Screening Magnetic
Resonance Imaging Protocol With Compressed Sensing 3-Dimensional T2-Weighted
Sequence. Invest Radiol 2018;53(12):742-747.
2. Wang Y.
Description of parallel imaging in MRI using multiple coils. Magnetic resonance
in medicine 2000;44(3):495-499.
3. Zhou R, Huang W,
Yang Y, et al. Simple motion correction strategy reduces respiratory-induced
motion artifacts for k-t accelerated and compressed-sensing cardiovascular
magnetic resonance perfusion imaging. J Cardiovasc Magn Reson 2018;20(1):6.
4. Ham CL, Engels JM,
van de Wiel GT, Machielsen A. Peripheral nerve stimulation during MRI: effects
of high gradient amplitudes and switching rates. J Magn Reson Imaging
1997;7(5):933-937.
5. Sharma SD, Fong
CL, Tzung BS, Law M, Nayak KS. Clinical image quality assessment of accelerated
magnetic resonance neuroimaging using compressed sensing. Invest Radiol
2013;48(9):638-645.
6. Zhang T, Chowdhury
S, Lustig M, et al. Clinical performance of contrast enhanced abdominal
pediatric MRI with fast combined parallel imaging compressed sensing
reconstruction. J Magn Reson Imaging 2014;40(1):13-25.
7. Kidoh M, Shinoda
K, Kitajima M, et al. Deep Learning Based Noise Reduction for Brain MR Imaging:
Tests on Phantoms and Healthy Volunteers. Magnetic resonance in medical
sciences : MRMS : an official journal of Japan Society of Magnetic Resonance in
Medicine 2020;19(3):195-206.
8. Uetani H, Nakaura
T, Kitajima M, et al. A preliminary study of deep learning-based reconstruction
specialized for denoising in high-frequency domain: usefulness in
high-resolution three-dimensional magnetic resonance cisternography of the
cerebellopontine angle. Neuroradiology 2021;63(1):63-71.
9. Uetani H, Nakaura
T, Kitajima M, et al. Hybrid deep-learning-based denoising method for
compressed sensing in pituitary MRI: comparison with the conventional
wavelet-based denoising method. Eur Radiol 2022;32(7):4527-4536.
10. Chaudhari AS, Fang
Z, Kogan F, et al. Super-resolution musculoskeletal MRI using deep learning.
Magnetic resonance in medicine 2018;80(5):2139-2154.
11. Pham CH, Tor-Diez
C, Meunier H, et al. Multiscale brain MRI super-resolution using deep 3D
convolutional networks. Comput Med Imaging Graph 2019;77:101647.
12. Chaudhari AS,
Stevens KJ, Wood JP, et al. Utility of deep learning super-resolution in the
context of osteoarthritis MRI biomarkers. J Magn Reson Imaging
2020;51(3):768-779.
13. Matsuo
K, Nakaura T, Morita K, et al. Feasibility study of super-resolution deep
learning-based reconstruction using k-space data in brain diffusion-weighted
images. Neuroradiology 2023;65(11):1619-1629.