James Grover1,2, Shanshan Shan1,3, Paul Keall1,2, and David E.J. Waddington1,2
1Image X Institute, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia, 2Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Sydney, Australia, 3State Key Laboratory of Radiation Medicine and Protection, Soochow University, Suzhou, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Other AI/ML, Machine Learning/Artificial Intelligence
Motivation: Higher temporal resolution is needed for many MRI-guidance applications. Reducing matrix sizes can increase temporal resolution at the cost of lower spatial resolution. Deep learning-based super-resolution could mitigate the trade-off in spatiotemporal resolution.
Goal(s): Develop and evaluate a unified deep learning-based algorithm that can up-sample thick single-slice low spatial resolution MRI to a thin multi-slice high spatial resolution MRI.
Approach: Developed a transformer residual cross (T-REX) neural network that simultaneously increased the spatial resolution and decreased the slice thickness providing high spatial resolution multi-slice MRI.
Results: T-REX was successfully trained and evaluated showing promising results for a variety of field strengths and sequences.
Impact: The ability to
acquire high spatial resolution volumetric MRI quicky has applications to
low-field MRI and MRI-guided radiation therapy. Here, we present our initial
findings of a unified neural network that applies volumetric super-resolution.
Introduction
MRI acquisition
time can be reduced by sampling fewer points in k-space, which is typically
achieved via under-sampling or reductions in matrix size. However, both approaches can lead to lower
image quality, via reductions in signal-to-noise ratio and/or reduced
spatial resolution.
This trade-off is amplified in the growing fields of low-field MRI1 (where low signal-to-noise per unit
time causes prolonged scan times) and MRI-guided radiation therapy2 (where real-time, low latency, cine-MRI
is required for treatment adaptation).
Deep learning has
been used in MRI image enhancement, including super-resolution – where low
spatial resolution images are up-sampled to a high spatial resolution. Here, we
present the transformer residual cross (T-REX) network, a unified transformer-based neural
network that applies super-resolution to up-sample a low spatial resolution thick slice MRI to a high spatial resolution thin multi-slice
MRI.Methods
T-REX comprises
of a convolutionally-based encoding arm for feature extraction and compression
to encode a high dimensionality to a low dimensionality. Once low
dimensionality is attained, this representation is passed through a multi-layer
transformer encoder. The output of the transformer encoder is then provided to
a convolutionally-based decoding arm for further feature extraction and
up-sampling to the desired dimensionality. Residual blocks, between encoding
and decoding arms, comprising of convolutions and skip connections extract and
retain high frequency features. A basic overview of T-REX is provided in Figure
1.
UPENN-GBM3 from the Cancer Imaging Archive4 was used to train and evaluate T-REX in
this study. 40 unstripped volumetric brain MRIs (corresponding to 40 patients)
acquired at 3.0 T were used as training data. Two test datasets (10 patients
each) were also derived for 3.0 T and 1.5 T to assess the generalisability of
the model to lower field strengths. The normalised (min-max) root
mean-square-error (NRMSE) was computed between each reconstructed patient
volume and the reference image. This workflow was conducted twice for T1w and
T2w datasets (i.e., a T1w and T2w T-REX models were trained and evaluated on
3.0 T and 1.5 T data).
Reference high
spatial resolution volumetric brain MRIs were processed to produce synthetic
inputs for T-REX. In-plane (axial) spatial resolution was decreased through central
cropping of k-space. Additive Gaussian noise was added to these low spatial
resolution slices (only during model training) to simulate low-field
acquisitions. The slice thickness was increased by taking an average
down-sampled slice for a neighbourhood of slices. The in-plane up-sampling
factor was 4× while the slick thickness decrease factor was 5×. For example, a
4×4×5 mm3 voxel was up-sampled to an isotropic 1 mm3.
During model training, the thick slices were overlapped to increase the
training data. This pipeline is shown in Figure 2. For model testing, each
thick slice generated 5 thin slices that were stacked to encompass the total
field-of-view of the reference MRI for a direct volumetric comparison.Results
T-REX was
successfully trained on T1w and T2w images creating both a T1w and T2w model. Qualitatively,
T-REX recovered high frequency features as shown in Figure 3 and 4. Additionally, T-REX
generalised well to lower (1.5 T testing data vs 3.0 T training data) field strengths
(Figure 4). The NRMSE values
across the 10 testing patients for both sequences and field strengths are
presented in figure 5.
Discussion
T-REX was
successful at the two distinct simultaneous tasks of decreasing slice thickness
and increasing in-plane spatial resolution in a unified neural network. Although
trained on 3.0 T MRI, it could generalise well to 1.5 T (for a variety of MRI
scanners) indicating transferability to low-field MRI and MRI-guided radiation therapy.
Further work will be conducted to improve model performance, especially in recovering
thin slices from thick slices for 1.5 T as noticeable artifacts were still
present using T-REX (Figure 4 coronal view). Additionally, further work to experiment with
T-REX to different anatomical sites will be undertaken, especially sites with
high motion (e.g., liver) for the downstream use of MRI-guided radiation
therapy.Conclusion
We present
T-REX, a transformer residual cross network for volumetric super-resolution. We
trained T-REX on 3.0 T and evaluated on 1.5 T and 3.0 T. Error metrics remained low and stable even when evaluating on MRI data acquired at half the field strength the model was trained on. These promising initial results show that T-REX can be applied to low-field MRI and MRI-guided radiation therapy.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by an Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship and a NHMRC Investigator Grant.References
1. Arnold TC, Freeman CW, Litt B, Stein
JM. Low‐field MRI: Clinical promise and challenges. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2023;57(1):25-44.
2. Keall PJ, Brighi C, Glide-Hurst C,
et al. Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy—opportunities and challenges. Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.
2022:1-13.
3. Bakas S, Sako C, Akbari H, et al.
The University of Pennsylvania glioblastoma (UPenn-GBM) cohort: Advanced MRI,
clinical, genomics, & radiomics. Scientific
data. 2022;9(1):453.
4. Clark K, Vendt B, Smith K, et al.
The Cancer Imaging Archive (TCIA): maintaining and operating a public
information repository. Journal of
digital imaging. 2013;26(6):1045-1057.