Yiling Liu1,2, Yanxing Yang3, Yu Wei1, Hao Chen1,2, Assaf Tal4, and Zhiyong Zhang1,2
1School of Biomedical Engineering, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 2National Engineering Research Center of Advanced Magnetic Resonance Technologies for Diagnosis and Therapy (NERC-AMRT), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai, China, 3United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 4Department of Chemical and Biological Physics, Weizmann Institute of Science, Rehovot, Israel
Synopsis
Keywords: Neurotransmission, Spectroscopy
Motivation: Many types of visual stimuli were reported effective for visual perception. However, it’s uncertain whether certain types of visual stimuli illicit larger responses.
Goal(s): We aim to measure the metabolic changes in response to different types of visual stimuli to observe which types of visual stimuli can excite larger and more consistent responses.
Approach: We designed three different types of stimuli sessions ( non-sense images, houses, and faces) for visual stimulation and observed the metabolic changes in the fMRS data at 5T.
Results: Preliminary experiments show that compared to non-sense images and “no interesting” houses, faces stimulate larger responses with dynamic increase.
Impact: An fMRS study is implemented to measure the dynamic changes in response to different types of visual stimuli. Preliminary experiments indicate that faces stimulate larger responses.
Introduction
It has been widely reported that BOLD-fMRI activation is observed during visual stimulation [1-4]. However, it’s still uncertain whether certain visual stimuli illicit larger, more consistent responses than others. Functional MRS (fMRS) is one of the dynamic MRS methods capable of detecting endogenous metabolic changes in glutamate, GABA, and lactate in response to external visual, motor, or cognitive manipulation [5]. In this work, we conduct a preliminary experiment to measure the dynamic metabolic changes in response to different types of stimulus (e.g. non-sense images, houses, and faces) using fMRS at a 5T scanner. Theory and Methods
Participants
Six healthy volunteers (4
females and 2males) were enrolled in the current study. Exclusion criteria
included history of stroke, seizures, severe vision problems, and metallic
implants. All subjects complied with MRI safety guidelines and signed informed
consent approved by the local ethics committee before each scanning session.
Visual Stimulation
The fMRI and fMRS
measurements were performed using a similar visual stimulus paradigm, which consists
of 3 sessions. For fMRS experiments, each of the sessions contains 3 blocks
REST1-TASK-REST2. The duration of REST1 block was 2 min and
included 60 scans. The duration of REST2 block was 3 min and included 90 scans.
A black background with a white fixation crosshair was displayed during all REST
periods. The TASK period consisted of 5 blocks of 50 s visual stimulation
interleaved with 10 s short rest duration (150 scans, 5 min in total). Three
types of visual stimuli images flashing at a frequency of 2Hz were used in the TASK
block of different sessions (session 1 - five non-sense images, session 2 - five
houses, session 3 - five faces). For BOLD experiments, the stimulus images are
the same as fMRS. Each session contains 3 consecutive cycles, with a task
period of 30 s and a rest period of 30 s (3 min total scan time).
Acquisition and Processing
MR experiments were performed on a uMR Jupyter 5T magnet (United Imaging, Shanghai, China) with a 48-channel receive head coil.
First,
high-resolution anatomical MPRAGE images (TR/TE = 9.2/3.2 ms, matrix size =
368x316, FOV = 256x220 mm2) were acquired to visualize the structure
of the occipital cortex. Then the BOLD-fMRI (multi-slice EPI, TR/TE = 2000/25
ms, FOV = 224x224 mm2, 75 slices) was performed to assist the
positioning of the volume-of-interest (VOI) within the activated visual cortex.
Finally, the functional 1H MRS measurements (TR/TE = 2000/60 ms,) were
performed using the Hise sequence optimized for 5T, combined with VAPOR water
suppression. The VOI (20×20×20 mm³) was carefully positioned in the visual cortex
based on the anatomical landmarks discernible on MPRAGE images. The B0 shimming
was performed automatically using the FASTMAP. The total duration of the
fMRI/fMRS sessions was approximately 40 min. BOLD activation maps were
calculated from the EPI BOLD data using a general linear model in SPM12 [6]. All
spectral processing was carried out using the Visual Display Interface
libraries [7].Results and Discussion
Figure 1 illustrates the
schematic diagram of the fMRS visual stimulation paradigm. Figure 2 (A)
shows MRS voxel placement and BOLD activation map. Figure 2 (B) shows one
example of the fMRS data during visual stimulation. Figure 3
displays sample MRS data and VDI fits, residual, as
well as the simulated individual basis functions of each session. This figure
shows a spectrum from a single time point – i.e. the result of averaging 15 TRs
(30s). It can be seen from the residual lines that the VDI fits the
spectrums well.
Figure 4 plots the meantime
dynamics of Glx=Glu+Gln, tCr=Cr+PCr, and tNAA=NAA+NAAG for sessions 1, 2, and
3. We can see that there are no significant dynamic changes in tCr and tNAA in
3 different sessions. For Glx, compared to responses from session 1 (non-sense
images) and session 2 (“no interesting” houses), the response from session 3 (faces)
is larger with an around 20% dynamic increase. As the current dataset is not big enough, more
participants will be collected for further statistical analysis. Conclusions
Our study investigates the metabolic changes in
response to three types of visual stimuli. Preliminary experiments show that compared
to non-sense images and “no interesting” houses, faces stimulate larger
responses with dynamic changes. More subjects will be
collected for further analysis in the future.Acknowledgements
This work is supported by
the National Natural Science Foundation of China National Science Foundation of
China (No. 62001290 and 62301309), Shanghai Science and Technology Development
Funds (21DZ1100300) and sponsored by the National Science and Technology
Innovation 2030 Major Project (2022ZD0208601). References
[1] Haxby J V, Gobbini M I, Furey M L, et al.
Distributed and overlapping representations of faces and objects in ventral
temporal cortex[J]. Science, 2001, 293(5539): 2425-2430.
[2] Uludağ K. Transient and sustained BOLD
responses to sustained visual stimulation[J]. Magnetic resonance imaging, 2008,
26(7): 863-869.
[3] Ishai A, Ungerleider L G, Martin A, et al.
Distributed representation of objects in the human ventral visual pathway[J].
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 1999, 96(16): 9379-9384.
[4] Levy I, Hasson U, Avidan G, et al.
Center–periphery organization of human object areas[J]. Nature neuroscience,
2001, 4(5): 533-539.
[5] Tal A. The future is 2D: spectral-temporal
fitting of dynamic MRS data provides exponential gains in precision over
conventional approaches [J]. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, 2022.
[6] Statistical parametric mapping: the analysis
of functional brain images[M]. Elsevier, 2011.
[7] Liu Y, Oeltzschner G, Ronen I, et al. Visual
Display Interface (VDI): A MATLAB Software Library For Simulating and
Processing In-Vivo Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopy and Spectroscopic Imaging
Data[J]. medRxiv, 2023: 2023.08. 31.23294888.