Philipp Hans Nunn1, Oliver Schad1, Jan-Peter Grunz1, Johannes Tran-Gia2, and Tobias Wech1
1Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany, 2Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
Synopsis
Keywords: Bone, Bone, Plug-and-Play Denoiser, IR-UTE, AI and Machine Learning
Motivation: (IR-)UTE MRI enables (quantitative) investigation of bony tissue. Imaging protocols, however, are still time consuming.
Goal(s): To develop a reconstruction method, which can transfer undersampled / accelerated IR-UTE scans of bone into high quality images.
Approach: A thresholded Landweber algorithm was implemented, which uses both an L1-sparsity model and a pre-trained denoising convolutional network as regularizers of the physical MR model.
Results: The reconstruction method was capable of delivering superior image quality compared to reconstructions based on straightforward NUFFT or iterative SENSE, especially in the case of significant undersampling.
Impact: IR-UTE imaging accelerated by our proposed
reconstruction based on L1-sparsity and a pre-trained denoising convolutional
neural network shortens investigations by a factor of up to five, thereby
facilitating further research on the topic as well as clinical transfer.
Introduction
MR-based depiction of bony tissue is
increasingly being investigated as a radiation-free alternative to computed
tomography for various diagnostic questions. However, to reach adequate image
quality, lengthy exams are typically still required. In this work, we implemented and tested a deep learning driven strategy to shorten the overall acquisition time in
IR-prepared ultra-short echo time (UTE) MR imaging. Methods
An IR-prepared UTE sequence similar to [1] was implemented in Pulseq [2] (see Fig. 1). Data sampling was performed using ramp
sampling and a 3D radial trajectory,
equally distributed on the k-space sphere (a.k.a koosh ball). Using a long adiabatic inversion
pulse, this approach suppresses the signal of tissues with longer T2 relaxation
times, thereby enabling a robust differentiation of compartments of cortical
and trabecular bone with short T2*. For each adiabatic IR pulse, seven
projections centered around TI = 64$$$\ $$$ms
were recorded with a temporal spacing of τ = 4.1$$$\,$$$ms between each. The adiabatic IR pulse had the shape of a
hyperbolic secant with a duration of 10$$$\,$$$ms centered around -220 Hz, which corresponds to the
midpoint between fat and water at 3$$$\,$$$T. kmax corresponded to an isotropic
spatial resolution of 1.6$$$\,$$$mm. Sample data
were acquired in the left ankle of one healthy volunteer and the head of another at 3$$$\,$$$T field strength (Siemens
Magnetom Prisma). Benchmark data consisting of 56$$$\,$$$k projections, as well as
prospectively undersampled data with 21$$$\,$$$k projections were acquired in 20:00$$$\,$$$min
(ankle) and 7:30$$$\,$$$min (head) scan time. The corresponding minimum FOV (corresponding
to largest gap in k-space until kmax) was 21$$$\,$$$cm for 56$$$\,$$$k projections and 13$$$\,$$$cm
for 21$$$\,$$$k projections. From the fully sampled dataset (ankle), undersampled
versions were simulated by retrospectively removing projections to build sets
with 28$$$\,$$$k and 11.2$$$\,$$$k respectively. Higher acceleration was also simulated in the
head dataset by using only half of the acquired data (10.5$$$\,$$$k projections).
To enable the reconstruction of undersampled and
thus accelerated scans, a thresholded Landweber styled algorithm was
implemented which features the enforcement of the physical measurement model (acquired
data $$$y$$$, coil sensitivities), the sparsity in image space (minimization of L1-norm)
as well as the integration of a pre-trained denoising convolutional neural
network (DnCNN,[3]). In the current version of the algorithm, we used an “off-the-shelf”
DnCNN model provided by MathWorks, not specifically trained for bone MRI.
Pseudo-code:
Input: $$$x_{0}
= A^{*}y, \gamma = 1, P_{0}=angle(x_{0})$$$
for $$$m=1,2,...,n$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$x_{m}=x_{m-1}-\gamma A^{*}(Ax_{m-1}-y)$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$x_{m}=real(x_{m}\circ e^{i\cdot(-P_{m-1})})$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$x_{m}=DnCNN(x_{m})$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$x_{m}=x_{m}\circ e^{i\cdot P_{m-1}}$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$x_{m}=STH_{\sigma}(x_{m})$$$
$$$\,\,\,\,\,\,\,\,$$$$$$P_{m}=angle(x_{m})$$$
end
return $$$x_{n}$$$
Matrix $$$A$$$ represents the MRI operator including a 3D gridding procedure [4],
initialized with the trajectory information and the coil
sensitivities, which were estimated from the densely sampled central part of the
3D k-space using ESPIRIT [5]. $$$x_{0}$$$ was determined by a “naïve reconstruction” using a grid size of 256 x 256 x 256. $$$STH_{\sigma}$$$ applies a soft threshold in image space with a threshold of $$$\sigma$$$, which was determined empirically based on the noise level. A number of $$$n$$$ = 15 was chosen for the
reconstruction of the ankle dataset, and $$$n$$$ = 13 for the head dataset. In the following, we refer to the proposed method as S3MOB (Speedy 3D MRI Of Bone). For comparison, conjugate
gradient SENSE [6] was applied to the same datasets.
Results
Fig. 2 and Fig. 3 depict the reconstructions of
ankle and head data for naïve gridding reconstruction, iterative SENSE, and the
proposed S3MOB method with different numbers of acquired projections.
With 56$$$\,$$$k projections, the naïve reconstruction results in a depiction of the ankle with low
artifact level, good SNR and sharp edges (Fig. 2). Since the data is not fully
sampled in the periphery of k-space, iterative SENSE could increase sharpness
slightly, however at the cost of also increasing noise. This effect is more
pronounced for higher acceleration factors. The application of S3MOB resulted in a good compromise between sharpness, SNR and artifact
level. This is confirmed by the head data shown in Fig. 3. Bone
microstructure could be resolved with good SNR, even with only 10.5$$$\,$$$k
projections, corresponding to an acquisition time of 3:45$$$\,$$$min.
Using an NVIDIA RTX A6000 GPU (48$$$\,$$$GB), the reconstruction time for S3MOB was between one (10.5$$$\,$$$k projections) and seven minutes (56$$$\,$$$k projections)
for the presented examples. Discussion & Conclusion
The proposed data-driven S3MOB technique represents a promising method to accelerate MRI in bony tissues. Next
steps include training the denoising CNN specifically for the imaging task,
studying the impact of the acceleration on quantitative imaging (T2*- or proton
density mapping) as well as the combination with alternative means of
acceleration, e.g. exploiting more efficient trajectories like FLORET [7].Acknowledgements
Presented work was partially funded by the Interdisciplinary Center
for Clinical Research in Würzburg under Research Grant F-437.References
1. Ma, Y-J, Chen, Y, Li, L, et al. Trabecular bone imaging using a 3D adiabatic inversion recovery prepared ultrashort TE Cones sequence at 3T. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2020:1640–1651. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28027.
2. Layton KJ, Kroboth S, Jia F, Littin S, Yu H, Leupold J, Nielsen JF,
Stocker T, Zaitsev M. Pulseq: A rapid and hardware-independent pulse sequence prototyping
framework. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2017:1544-1552 doi: 10.1002/mrm.26235.
3. Zhang, K, Zuo, W,
Chen, Y, Meng, D, Zhang, L. Beyond a Gaussian Denoiser: Residual Learning of
Deep CNN for Image Denoising. IEEE Transactions on Image Processing 2017:3142-3155
doi: 10.1109/TIP.2017.2662206.
4. MATLAB implementation of Non-Uniform Fast Fourier Transform in 3D. https://github.com/marcsous/nufft_3d.
Accessed October 31, 2023.
5. BART Toolbox for
Computational Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Version v0.7.00.
https://mrirecon.github.io/bart/. Accessed October 31, 2023.
6. Pruessmann KP,
Weiger M, Börnert P, Boesiger P. Advances in sensitivity encoding with
arbitrary k-space trajectories. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 2001:638-651.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.1241.
7. Yoneyama, M, Azuma, M, et al. Volume isotropic 3D
bone Imaging with broadband IR-prepared FLORET UTE and Fibonacci interleaved
trajectory ordering. Proceedings of the International Society for Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2023:0632.