Bei Zhang1, Daniel Lowrance1, Jae Mo Park1, and Anke Henning1
1Advanced Imaging Research Center, UTSouthwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: RF Arrays & Systems, RF Arrays & Systems, 3T 13C applications, low field transmit array design
Motivation: Tackle the coupling issue among the coil elements in phased array design at low field, so as to use phased array as transceiver at low fields for good transmit efficiency, receive sensitivity profile, and acceleration performance.
Goal(s): Design and build a 3T 13C/1H 8-channel array for hyperpolarized 13C MRSI and steady-state 13C MRS after oral uptake of 13C labelled glucose
Approach: Use a novel cable trap decoupling mechanism to decouple the coil elements in the 3T 13C 8-channel array
Results: Workbench and experiment results show that the coil elements are decoupled very well with each other.
Impact: This innovative research on mitigating coil element coupling in
low-field phased array designs empowers low-field MRI applications. Enhanced
transmit efficiency, receive sensitivity and acceleration performance offer
improved diagnostic quality, benefiting scientists, clinicians, and patients.
INTRODUCTION
Phased array (1) principle has been widely used as transmit and receive (TxRx) array
designs at high and ultra-high field MRI systems (2,3).
However, phased arrays have been rarely used as transmit coil design at low
field due to the strong coupling among the coil elements, which exists not only
between the adjacent coil elements, but non-adjacent coil elements. Such coupling
can be mitigated through preamplifier decoupling mechanism in a receive array
design. In a transmit array design, however, new decoupling mechanisms must be
introduced to decouple the coil elements. In this work, we designed and built a 3T 8-channel 13C/1H
TxRx array with a novel cable trap decoupling mechanism.METHOD
Coil Design:
Figure 1a shows the schematic diagram of three 13C
coil elements with cable trap decoupling circuits and Figure 1b shows the
schematic diagram of the cable trap decoupling circuit only. Each cable trap decoupling
circuit consists of an inductor (L) and capacitors Cpx11, Cpx12,
Cpx21, Cpx22, Cpx31 and Cpx32 (x=1,
2, …, as their capacitance values may vary for different coil element
decoupling). The cable trap is a parallel LC resonant circuit formed by an
inductor, formed by 5 turns of 29-aug micro-coax wound on a 6 mm-diameter
hollowed rod, and two capacitors (Cpx11, Cpx12, and Cpx11=Cpx12)
placed at the two ends of a 5mm-wide PCB across the hollowed tube of the rod. The
cable trap was placed at the middle point so that the length of the coax cable
to the two coil elements to be decoupled is the same, as shown in Figure 1c. The
eight 165mm × 113mm 13C coil elements were sitting on a
230mm-diameter cylinder, with the nose part raised up by 15mm. Adjacent coil
elements were decoupled with each other by optimizing their geometric overlap.
Cable trap decoupling circuit was used to decouple non-adjacent coil elements
(coil 1 vs. coil 3, and coil 1 vs. coil 4). Eight 145mm × 120mm 1H
coil elements (Figure 1d) were placed on a 260mm-diameter cylinder. The 13C
and 1H arrays were co-centered and had 45° offset with each other in
XY plane. Adjacent coil elements were decoupled by optimized geometric overlap.
Each coil element was connected to its own TR-switch and preamplifier. Cable
length was adjusted for preamplifier decoupling. 13C and 1H
1:8 power splitters were used to split the 13C and 1H
transmit powers into 8 with 45° offset respectively. Phantom Experiment:
SNR was measured in a spherical ethylene
phantom to characterize the performance of
the 13C and 1H arrays spatially. For 13C, a 2D
CSI sequence with/without RF excitation was used to calculate SNR
voxel-by-voxel by dividing the peak absolute signal by the standard deviation
of noise; for 1H, SNR maps were reconstructed from two GRE
sequences with and without RF excitation (4). Proton decoupling performance was evaluated by using the same 2D CSI sequence
with and without proton decoupling. In vivo Experiment: Human subject studies were performed following a protocol approved by
our institutional review
board, and informed consent was obtained from subjects. In vivo 1H head imaging was acquired with 3D MPRAGE and
FLAIR sequences. All scans were performed on
a Siemens Prisma 3T MRI system (Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany).RESULT AND DISCUSSION
Unloaded to loaded Q ratio is 3.2 for the 13C
coil element and 5.8 for 1H. Figure 2 shows the S-parameter matrices
and the noise correlation matrix of the 1H and 13C
arrays. The coil elements furthest to each other in the 13C array, e.g.
coil 1 vs. coil 5, have the strongest coupling (max S21 = -11.6dB), as no
decoupling mechanism was implemented between them. For the 1H array,
all the S21 is lower than -13dB. Noise correlation matrices also showed that
both arrays were well decoupled, with off-diagonal elements less than 0.35 in both.
Figure 3 shows SNR maps of the 13C and 1H arrays. Both
have higher signals in the peripheral area of the phantom. 13C
spectra in the same voxel with/without proton decoupling shown in Figure 4 has
no noise increase with proton decoupling, demonstrating sufficient decoupling
between 1H and 13C. Figure 5 shows high-resolution head
images acquired with the 3D FLAIR and MPRAGE sequences.CONCLUSION
We designed and built a 3T 8-channel 13C/1H
array with cable trap decoupling mechanism. Workbench
and experiment results show that the coil elements are decoupled very well with
each other. We are testing 13C sequences to use this array for hyperpolarized 13C MRSI and steady-state 13C
MRS after oral uptake of 13C labelled glucose.Acknowledgements
This work was funded by Cancer Prevention and
Research Institute of Texas (CPRIT) RR180056 and was performed under the rubric
of the Advanced Imaging Research Center, UT Southwestern Medical Center.References
1. Roemer PB, Edelstein WA,
Hayes CE, Souza SP, Mueller OM. The NMR phased array. Magn Reson Med
1990;16(2):192-225.
2. Avdievich
NI, Ruhm L, Dorst J, Scheffler K, Korzowski A, Henning A. Double-tuned (31)
P/(1) H human head array with high performance at both frequencies for
spectroscopic imaging at 9.4T. Magn Reson Med 2020;84(2):1076-1089.
3. Wang
B, Zhang B, Yu Z, Ianniello C, Lakshmanan K, Paska J, Madelin G, Cloos M, Brown
R. A radially interleaved sodium and proton coil array for brain MRI at 7 T.
NMR Biomed 2021;34(12):e4608.
4. Kellman P, McVeigh ER. Image
reconstruction in SNR units: a general method for SNR measurement. Magn Reson
Med 2005;54(6):1439-1447.