Alfredo Ordinola1, Evren Özarslan1, Yu Yin2, Ruiliang Bai3, and Magnus Herberthson4
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden, 2Department of Chemistry, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 3School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China, 4Department of Mathematics, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden
Synopsis
Keywords: Relaxometry, Relaxometry, Water exchange, diffusion physics
Motivation: Transmembrane water exchange in brain tissue is a process often modelled via the first order kinetics reaction (1OKR) expression. However, this expression does not account for diffusion dynamics, suggesting it is not suitable to describe diffusion-driven exchange.
Goal(s): Assess the difference between the 1OKR expression and the exchange fraction derived from a generally defined system.
Approach: The exchange fraction was derived considering geometry, and compartment-specific relaxation processes of a system via the diffusion-reaction equation.
Results: The derived exchange fraction features a multi-exponential recovery at short times and a mono-exponential decay at long times, both of which are not captured by the 1OKR expression.
Impact: The two
additional features of the exchange fraction found in this work provide
additional insight on a system’s microstructure and properties. This expression
can therefore be the basis of new biophysical models which more accurately
describe the water exchange process.
Introduction & Theory
Transmembrane water exchange has
been studied using different frameworks using magnetic resonance (MR)
relaxation and diffusion measurements1-5. Most frameworks study two
compartment systems (here labelled as A and B) and model exchange via the first
order kinetics reaction (1OKR) expression:
$$f_{a,b}(t)=f_{b,a}(t)=f_a\,f_b\,\left(1-e^{-k\,t}\right),\qquad{(1)}$$
where $$$f_{a,b}(t)$$$ is the
exchange fraction, $$$f_a$$$ and $$$f_b$$$ are equilibrium fractions, and
$$$k$$$ the exchange rate. The 1OKR expression is suitable to describe chemical
reaction kinetics, however it may not be appropriate to describe
diffusion-driven exchange processes since it holds no relationship to diffusion
dynamics. In this work, we address this limitation by deriving an expression
for the exchange fraction directly from the analysis of the diffusion-reaction
equation.Methods
Diffusion
dynamics are governed by the following diffusion-reaction equation:
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial{t}}p(x,t)=\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\left[D(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}p(x,t)\right]-H(x)\,p(x,t),\qquad{(2)}$$
where
$$$p(x,t)$$$ denotes the particle density, $$$D(x)$$$ the diffusivity, and
$$$H(x)$$$ the magnetization relaxation rate. All components of Eq.2 are space
dependent, which accounts for the geometry of the analysed system. Solving this
differential equation in a bounded domain ($$$x\in\Psi$$$) allows to express
the space dependent terms in the following eigenbasis:
$$\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}\left[D(x)\frac{\partial}{\partial{x}}u_n(x)\right]-H(x)u_n(x)=-\lambda_{n}u_n(x)
,\qquad{(3)}$$
where the diffusion spectrum
consists of the (non-negative) eigenvalues $$$\lambda_n$$$, and orthonormal
eigenfunctions $$$u_n(x)$$$ which satisfy any given boundary conditions.
The
proposed method, illustrated in Fig.1, models the exchange fraction
$$$f_{a,b}$$$ by first imposing a uniform and non-zero initial condition only
in compartment A. After
time $$$t$$$, some particles
will have diffused over to the second compartment. Finally, $$$f_{a,b}$$$
is calculated as the ratio of
the number of particles in
the second pool to the number of particles in the
domain, yielding:
$$f_{a,b}(t)=\sum_{n=0}^{\infty}e^{-\lambda_n\,t}\alpha_n\,\beta_n=e^{-\lambda_0\,t}\alpha_0\,\beta_0\left[1+\sum_{n=1}^{\infty}e^{-\left(\lambda_n-\lambda_0\right)\,t}\frac{\alpha_n\,
\beta_n}{\alpha_0\,\beta_0}\right],\qquad{(4)}$$
where:
$$\alpha_n=\int_{A}dx\,u_n(x),\qquad\beta_n=\int_{B}dx\,u_n(x)\qquad{(5)}$$
For
systems featuring relaxation, $$$\lambda_0\neq0$$$ and introduces an
exponential decay to $$$f_{a,b}$$$. Furthermore, the sum series of exponential
functions imply that $$$f_{a,b}$$$ features a multi-exponential recovery over
time.
To
test our findings, data from four identical urea-water (UW) samples and two
simulated periodic systems (referred to as S1 and S2) were analysed. UW samples present a two-compartment exchanging system6,7 which lacks a defined geometry, making them
useful to observe the exponential decay in $$$f_{a,b}$$$. The simulated systems
(illustrated in Fig.2a) were composed of two compartments with a membrane
between them. Each compartment is fully defined by its diffusivity, relaxation
rates, and length, and the membranes, by their permeability (parameters are
presented in Table
1a). Data from a REXSY1 experiment (Fig.2b) was
acquired for the UW samples (600MHz Bruker scanner) and synthesised for S1 and
S2 employing a matrix formalism (which makes use of the diffusion spectrum).
The acquisition and simulation parameters are presented in Table 1b.
The
exchange fraction was obtained from our derivations (referred to as the
extracted exchange fraction) and estimated from experimental and simulated data (referred to as the estimated exchange
fraction) by adapting a
framework originally introduced for diffusion encoded measurements5 to relaxation experiments. All
computations were performed with Mathematica and Python software developed
in-house.Results
The
estimated exchange fraction from the experiments on UW samples is presented in Fig.3, where the
exponential decay of $$$f_{a,b}$$$ can be observed across all samples. The
extracted fractions are presented in Fig.4a, where the inability to reproduce
the full expression with fewer terms shows the multi-exponential feature in
$$$f_{a,b}$$$. The extracted and estimated fractions from simulated systems are
presented in Fig.4b, which show both features found in our derivations.Discussion & Conclusion
Regarding the method, Eq.4 shows two
distinct features: a mono-exponential decay (caused by relaxation effects in
the system) in the long-time regime, and a multi-exponential recovery
(dependent on the diffusion spectrum of the system) in the short-time regime, neither
of which is captured by the 1OKR expression. The first feature can be observed
in the results from the UW samples. The second feature has been previously
reported in ex-vivo animal experiments8, which was attributed to multiple
exchange mechanisms. Our derivations offer another mechanism: the effect of
geometry, membrane permeability and diffusion dynamics within the analysed
system.
Regarding the simulation results, the
multi-exponential feature is more apparent in S1, suggesting that a
larger difference between diffusion coefficients in compartments enhances this trend.
Furthermore, this feature is dampened in the estimated functions, but not
completely suppressed. This may be due to the employed framework, which was
originally proposed under different assumptions (e.g., Gaussian diffusion)5.
Nevertheless, it is remarkable that both features are observed in the estimated
exchange fractions.
In conclusion, we derived an
exchange fraction expression (Eq.4) different from the widely employed first
order kinetics reaction one (Eq.1). The new expression accounts for diffusion
dynamics and can thus provide more insight of the analysed system (diffusivity,
relaxation, geometry, and membrane permeability).Acknowledgements
The authors acknowledge support from the Swedish Research Council (Dnr 2022-04715), and the Swedish Foundation for International Cooperation in Research and Higher Education (STINT - Dnr CH2020-8680).References
1. Lee JH,
Labadie C, Springer CS, Harbison GS. Two-dimensional inverse laplace transform
NMR: altered relaxation times allow detection of exchange correlation. J Am
Chem Soc. 1993;115(17):7761-7764
2.
Washburn KE, Callaghan PT. Tracking pore to pore exchange using relaxation exchange spectroscopy. Phys Rev Lett. 2006;97(17):175502
3. Ramadan
S. Diffusion-exchange weighted imaging. Magn Reson Insights. 2009;3:11-19
4. Åslund
I, Nowacka A, Nilsson M, Topgaard D. Filter-exchange PGSE NMR determination of
cell membrane permeability. J Magn Reson. 2009;200(2):291-295
5. Cai TX,
Benjamini D, Komlosh ME, Basser PJ, Williamson NH. Rapid detection of the
presence of diffusion exchange. J Magn Reson. 2018;297:17-22
6. Dortch RD, Horch RA, Does MD. Development, simulation, and
validation of NRM relaxation-based exchange measurements. J Chem Phys. 2009;131:164502
7.
Bai R, Benjamini D, Cheng J, Basser PJ. Fast, accurate 2D-MR relaxation exchange spectroscopy (REXSY): Beyond compressed
sensing. J Chem Phys. 2016;145:154202
8. Cai TX,
Williamson N, Ravin R, Basser PJ. Multiexponential analysis of diffusion
exchange times reveals a distinct exchange process associated with metabolic
activity. Proc Intl Soc Mag Reson Med. 2023;31:5017