Wen Shi1,2, Dengrong Jiang2, Zhiyi Hu1,2, Kaisha Hazel2, George Pottanat2, Ebony Jones2, Cuimei Xu2, Vivek Yedavalli2, Doris Lin2, Sevil Yasar3, Yulin Ge4, Abhay Moghekar3, and Hanzhang Lu1,2
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2Department of Radiology & Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Department of Radiology, New York University Grossman School of Medicine, New York, NY, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Velocity/Flow, Perfusion, Transit Time, Vein
Motivation: Venous transit time (VTT) is insufficiently investigated and can be a useful marker for clinical populations with abnormalities in the cerebral venous system.
Goal(s): To further verify a novel non-contrast VICTR MRI and investigate advanced VTT properties and their age effects in the brain.
Approach: We compared the VTT from VICTR and a contrast-based method. Statistical properties of VTT distribution were studied in a caffeine challenge and compared between young and older subjects.
Results: VTT from VICTR MRI showed great agreement with contrast-based VTT. The mean, peak, and spread of VTT increased in the caffeine challenge. VTT is longer in the older subjects.
Impact: VICTR MRI can measure venous transit time in
the adult brain which increases with age. The non-contrast measurement of venous
transit time paves the way for several research avenues to better understand
vascular function in the normal and pathological brain.
Introduction
The cerebral venous
system is a crucial vascular network but is insufficiently investigated
compared to its arterial counterpart1–4.
Venous transit time (VTT) which denotes the time for the blood to travel from
the capillary exchange sites to major veins, e.g., superior sagittal sinus
(SSS), is a new hemodynamic parameter. We recently proposed a novel non-contrast
MRI technique, Venous transit time Imaging by Changes in T1 Relaxation (VICTR),
to measure VTT in the SSS5.
Here, we further verified the measured VTT by comparison to a bolus tracking
method using gadolinium (Gd)-based contrast agent and studied several more advanced
VTT properties. Lastly, we assessed the age effect on VTT properties. Methods
VICTR
MRI: Figure 1 shows the diagram of the MR pulse sequence and data
processing. Briefly, the water spins experience a two-phase T1 relaxation before
measurement in the veins, i.e., recovery with tissue T1 and, once exchanged
into the capillary, with blood T1 for a duration of VTT5.
Given the biexponential T1 recovery, a distinct SSS signal trace can be
measured at different time points, and a VTT distribution is then obtained. The
scan was performed at posterior SSS with the following parameters: FOV=150×150×10mm3,
voxel size=2.3×2.3×10mm3, 30 TR patterns, TE=14ms, VENC=35cm/s. An M0 scan with TR=10s and identical
acquisition was performed to normalize the signal. All experiments were performed
on a 3T Siemens Prisma with IRB approval.
Study
1: Comparison with Gd–based method: Ten healthy volunteers (27±5
years, 3M/7F) participated in this experiment. Dynamic susceptibility contrast
(DSC) MRI allows bolus tracking as the contrast agent passes by the capillary
and veins, providing another VTT measurement. We thus performed a DSC scan with
the following protocol6:
single-slice, TR/TE=100/25ms, FOV=205×205×5mm3, voxel size=3.2×3.2×5mm3.
MR contrast agent gadobutrol (Gadavist, Bayer Healthcare) was administrated
intravenously (dose=0.1 mmol/kg, infusion rate=4 mL/s). To estimate the Gd-based
VTT, we manually delineated the regions of SSS to obtain the averaged MRI signal.
The mid-point of the times when the maximum and minimum slope of the signal appears
was used as the SSS bolus arrival time (BAT). The same procedure was applied to
a tissue ROI to obtain a tissue BAT. Gd-based VTT can then be obtained by: $$$VTT_{Gd}=BAT_{SSS}-BAT_{tissue}$$$.
Study
2: Advanced VTT properties: The VTT we obtained experimentally from
VICTR MRI was a distribution, e.g., Figure 1e. Our previous study has only
explored one property of this distribution, namely the peak time of the
distribution (peak VTT). In this study, we aimed to examine several other statistical
properties of the VTT distribution, i.e., mean, standard deviation, skewness,
and kurtosis. A vasoconstrictive caffeine challenge was conducted to study the
sensitivity to physiological changes in each of these properties7,8.
Eight healthy volunteers (28±6 years, 3M/5F) were enrolled and each underwent a
baseline VICTR scan and another one after taking a 200mg caffeine tablet.
Study
3: Aging effect: VICTR MRI was performed on twenty healthy young (27±5yrs,
7M/13F) and twenty elderly subjects (73±8yrs, 9M/11F). Whole-brain cerebral
blood flow (CBF) was also measured using phase-contrast MRI9.
Another physiological parameter, global venous cerebral blood volume (vCBV), was
quantified by: $$$vCBV = mean \ VTT \times CBF$$$.Results and discussion
Study 1: Figure 2b shows representative baseline and
post-contrast T2*-weighted images using the DSC method. The image intensity was
substantially reduced after the contrast injection. The typical signal time
courses in the tissue and SSS are shown in Figure 2c in which the tissue signal
exhibits an early drop. Figure 2d-e shows that both peak (R=0.84, P=0.002) and
mean VTT (R=0.87, P=0.001) of VICTR MRI have a significant correlation with Gd-based
VTT.
Study 2: Figure 3b shows the representative VTT
distributions during the caffeine challenge. Figure 3c-3g shows that caffeine ingestion
resulted in significant increases in peak (P<0.001), mean (P=0.020), and standard
deviation (P=0.004) of VTT and there is a decreasing trend in skewness, with no
change in kurtosis.
Study 3: Figure 4a-c shows that peak (P=0.045), mean (P<0.001)
and kurtosis (P=0.006) are significantly higher in elderly subjects compared to
young subjects. Figure 4d-e shows a decreasing trend in standard deviations but
no changes in skewness with age. Figure 4f shows that the elderly generally
have a lower vCBV. Figure 5 shows that the global CBF significantly decreases
in elderly people and peak VTT is inversely correlated with the global CBF (R=-0.772,
P<0.001), suggesting that the increased peak VTT in the elderly is
associated with reduced CBF.Conclusion
VICTR MRI
results showed consistency with the contrast agent-based approach Several statistical
properties of VTT distribution are sensitive to physiological changes. VTT becomes
longer in the elderly compared to the younger subjects.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgment found.References
1. Wilson
MH. Monro-Kellie 2.0: The dynamic vascular and venous pathophysiological
components of intracranial pressure. J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2016;36(8):1338–50.
2. Schuchardt F, Schroeder L, Anastasopoulos C, et al. In vivo analysis of physiological 3D blood flow of cerebral veins. Eur. Radiol. 2015;25(8):2371–80.
3. Lee
BC, Tsai HH, Liu CJ, et al. Cerebral Venous Reflux
and Cerebral Amyloid Angiopathy: An Magnetic Resonance Imaging/Positron
Emission Tomography Study. Stroke. 2023;54(4):1046–55.
4. Hua
J, Liu P, Kim T, et al. MRI techniques to measure
arterial and venous cerebral blood volume. Neuroimage. 2019;187:17–31.
5. Shi
W, Jiang D, Moghekar A, et al. VICTR : Venous transit time ( VTT ) Imaging
by Changes in T1 Relaxation. Proceedings of the ISMRM & SMRT Annual
Meeting & Exhibition 32th Annual Meeting. 2023.
6. Liu
P, Uh J, Devous MD, et al. Comparison of relative cerebral blood flow
maps using pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and single photon emission
computed tomography. NMR Biomed. 2012;25(5):779–86.
7. Lin
Z, Jiang D, Liu P, et al. Blood–brain barrier permeability in
response to caffeine challenge. Magn Reson Med. 2022;88(5):2259–66.
8. Addicott
MA, Yang LL, Peiffer AM, et al. The effect of
daily caffeine use on cerebral blood flow: How much caffeine can we tolerate?
Hum Brain Mapp. 2009;30(10):3102–14.
9. Peng
SL, Su P, Wang FN, et al. Optimization of phase-contrast
MRI for the quantification of whole-brain cerebral blood flow. J Magn Reson
Imaging. 2015;42(4):1126–33.