Feng Xu1,2, Dapeng Liu1,2, Dan Zhu1,2, Anja Soldan3, Marilyn Albert3, Martin Lindquist4, Doris D. M. Lin1, and Qin Qin1,2
1The Russell H. Morgan Department of Radiology and Radiological Science, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 2F.M. Kirby Research Center for Functional Brain Imaging, Kennedy Krieger Institute, Baltimore, MD, United States, 3Department of Neurology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States, 4Department of Biostatistics, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Arterial Spin Labelling, Perfusion, Cerebral blood flow, arterial transit time, multi time point, arterial spin labeling
Motivation: Existing multi-timepoint arterial spin labeling (ASL) methods can only estimate cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit time (ATT) with a limited range of ATT (<2000ms).
Goal(s): Improve quantification of CBF and ATT for a wide range of ATT.
Approach: MULTIVERSE ASL applies combined fitting of multi-PLD pseudo-continuous (PC) ASL and multi-PLD velocity-selective (VS) ASL to measure CBF and ATT.
Results: With the same scan time, MULTIVERSE ASL improved the accuracy and precision and reduced uncertainty in CBF and ATT quantification across an extended range of ATT (500-4000ms).
Impact: This novel and straightforward approach
improves perfusion measurement over the extended range of arterial transit time
which was not possible with existing ASL methods. It highlights the clinical
potential of ASL-based perfusion mapping in various altered physiological and
pathological conditions.
Introduction
It is desirable for arterial spin
labeling (ASL) to quantify both cerebral blood flow (CBF) and arterial transit
time (ATT) among various clinical populations. Pseudo-continuous ASL (PCASL) underestimates
CBF when ATT is longer than the recommended post-labeling delay (PLD) of 2000ms1. Multi-timepoint PCASL methods were largely
optimized for ATT<1800ms2. While velocity-selective
ASL (VSASL) mitigates the susceptibility to prolonged ATT, it was recently shown
to underestimate CBF when trailing-edge-ATT is shorter than the applied PLD3,4. A new technique termed (VESPA) was
developed that added PC labeling during the PLD after the VS labeling in one
sequence to allow improved CBF and ATT estimation for ATT<1800ms5. Here we propose a novel and
straightforward approach, dubbed MULti-TImepoint VElocity-selective Reconciled
with Spatially-sElective or “MULTIVERSE” ASL, through combined fitting of multi-PLD
PCASL and VSASL to compensate for their respective ATT sensitivity and measure CBF
and ATT for a wide range of ATT (500-4000ms).Methods
Similar to VESPA ASL method5, the key concept of MULTIVERSE ASL is also
to establish the ATT from the trailing edge of the VSASL bolus equal to the ATT
of the leading edge of the PCASL bolus. Instead of using a modified spatially
selective VS module as in VESPA ASL5, MULTIVERSE ASL inserts several
inferior saturation pulses (ISP) following the VS module to crush the inflow of
blood below the labeling plane of PCASL.
Monte Carlo simulation was performed
using PLD of 500ms, 1000ms, 1500ms, 2000ms, and 2500ms. The noise was added to
match the SNR efficiency for multi-PLD ASL and the combined method. Bias was
defined by the difference between the mean of estimates and the ground truth
and then normalized by the ground truth. Precision was defined by the
coefficients of variation (CoV) of estimates.
Experiments were conducted on a 3T
Philips scanner using a 32-channel head-only receive coil with 7 healthy
volunteers (5F, 27-68yo) enrolled. PCASL used a labeling duration of 1800ms. VS
inversion-based VSASL6,7 used a cut-off velocity of 2.0cm/s. 3D
GRASE acquisition covered the whole brain with FOV: 220x220x120mm3,
voxel size: 3.4x3.4x5.0mm3. PCASL and VSASL were acquired with 5
PLDs described above with 4 repeats and 13min scan duration respectively.
CBF and ATT were fitted using the
general kinetic models8 with the least square method. The
fitting uncertainty was assessed by the 95% Confidence interval (CI) of the fitted
CBF and ATT, and the normalized standard error (nSE=SE/fitted value). Using CBF
and ATT fitted from MULTIVERSE ASL with a total of 26min data as the ground
truth, the 6.5min multi-PLD PCASL, VSASL, and MULTIVERSE ASL were compared with
voxel-wise bias, standard deviation (SD) of the bias, and root mean square
error (RMSE).Results and Discussion
Fig.1 provides fitting examples of multi-PLD PCASL, multi-PLD VSASL, and
MULTIVERSE ASL with true ATT=600ms, 1800ms, and 3000ms, respectively. Fig.2
shows the comparison of the three methods from Monte Carlo simulations. Across
a wide range of ATT (500-4000ms), MULTIVERSE ASL outperformed in the accuracy
and precision of CBF fitting than multi-PLD PCASL or multi-PLD VSASL (Fig.2a, c).
MULTIVERSE provided better accuracy in estimating ATT overall and better
precision in moderate and long ATT than multi-PLD PCASL and VSASL (Fig.2b, d).
Fig.3
shows that multi-PLD PCASL provided a higher perfusion signal at regions with shorter
ATT (e.g. frontal lobe) while VSASL provided a higher perfusion signal at
regions with longer ATT (e.g. posterior lobe). Fig.3 also shows comparable CBF
and ATT maps resulting from 6.5min multi-PLD PCASL, VSASL, and MULTIVERSE ASL, respectively,
which are slightly noisier than the MULTIVERSE ASL results using the entire
26min of data. Fig.4 illustrates CBF and ATT maps from all 7 subjects given by MULTVERSE
ASL with 6.5min of data, showing normal variations of gender and age7.
Table
1 shows that CI of CBF and ATT were narrower in MULTIVERSE ASL and multi-PLD PCASL
compared to multi-PLD VSASL, and nSE was significantly shorter in MULTIVERSE ASL
than in either PCASL (P=0.007/0.01 for CBF/ATT) or VSASL (P=0.0008/P<0.0001),
indicating a more reliable fitting in MULTIVERSE ASL. When using the 26min
MULTIVERSE ASL as ground truth, 6.5min MULTIVERSE ASL demonstrated less bias
than PCASL (P=0.0003/0.002 for CBF/ATT) or VSASL (P=0.0002/0.001); less SD of
bias than PCASL (P=0.002/0.004) or VSASL (P<0.0001/P<0.0001); less RMSE
than PCASL (P=0.002/0.004) or VSASL (P<0.0001/P=0.0001).Conclusion
Compared to multi-PLD PCASL or VSASL
alone, the combined fitting of MULTIVERSE ASL improved the accuracy and
precision and reduced uncertainty in CBF and ATT quantification across an extended
range of ATT, which was not possible with existing ASL methods. This novel
method highlights the clinical potential of ASL in various altered
physiological and pathological conditions.Acknowledgements
No acknowledgement found.References
1 Alsop
DC, Detre JA, Golay X, Günther M, Hendrikse J, Hernandez-Garcia L et al.
Recommended implementation of arterial spin-labeled perfusion MRI for clinical
applications: A consensus of the ISMRM perfusion study group and the European
consortium for ASL in dementia. Magn Reson Med 2015; 73: 102–116.
2 Woods JG, Chappell MA, Okell TW. A
general framework for optimizing arterial spin labeling MRI experiments. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2019; 81: 2474–2488.
3 Xu F, Xu C, Liu D, Zhu D, Lu H, Qin Q.
Comparison of Velocity Selective ASL and PCASL with Phase-Contrast MRI for
Measuring CO2-induced Cerebrovascular Reactivity. In: Proceedings of the
31th annual meeting of ISMRM. London, England, UK, 2022, p 4907.
4 Ian D. Driver, Chandler HL, Patitucci
E, Wise RG, Germuska M. Velocity-selective arterial spin labelling bolus
duration measurements: Implications for consensus recommendations. In: Proceedings
of the 32th annual meeting of ISMRM. Toronto, ON, Canada, 2023, p 0375.
5 Woods JG, Wong EC, Boyd EC, Bolar DS.
VESPA ASL: VElocity and SPAtially Selective Arterial Spin Labeling. Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 2022; 87: 2667–2684.
6 Qin Q, van Zijl PCM.
Velocity-selective-inversion prepared arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med
2016; 76: 1136–1148.
7 Xu F, Liu D, Zhu D, Hillis AE, Bakker
A, Soldan A et al. Test-retest reliability of 3D velocity-selective
arterial spin labeling for detecting normal variations of cerebral blood flow. Neuroimage
2023; 271: 120039.
8 Buxton RB, Frank LR, Wong EC, Siewert
B, Warach S, Edelman RR. A general kinetic model for quantitative perfusion
imaging with arterial spin labeling. Magn Reson Med 1998; 40:
383–396.