Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Cardiovascular, fetal, low-field, online reconstruction
Motivation: Real-time MRI methods with higher spatiotemporal resolution employ undersampled non-Cartesian trajectories combined with a computationally intense reconstruction to mitigate aliasing. However, often, a low-latency, coarse-temporal resolution, low-quality reconstruction is provided online. This may hinder the scan quality in interventional and fetal imaging.
Goal(s): To develop a low-latency, high-temporal resolution online reconstruction for real-time MRI.
Approach: We introduce a novel method using Dynamic Mode Decomposition for low-latency, high-temporal resolution reconstruction that removes spiral aliasing. The online version is achieved by predicting and removing aliasing artifacts in upcoming frames.
Results: We evaluate DMD Filtering in the context of real-time adult and fetal cardiac function assessment.
Impact: The proposed technique, Dynamic Mode Decomposition filtering, achieves low-latency (<20ms/frame), high-temporal resolution reconstruction with negligible spiral aliasing artifact, and no iterations. This may be valuable for online reconstruction during interventional and fetal cardiac imaging.
We acknowledge grant support from the National Institutes of Health (U01-HL167613, R21-HL159533) and National Science Foundation (Award #1828736) and research support from Siemens Healthineers.
1. Nayak KS, Lim Y, Campbell-Washburn AE, Steeden J. Real-Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging. Journal of Magnetic Resonance Imaging. 2022;55(1):81-99. doi:10.1002/jmri.27411
2. Schmid PJ. Dynamic mode decomposition of numerical and experimental data. Journal of Fluid Mechanics. 2010;656:5-28. doi:10.1017/S0022112010001217
3. Jovanović MR, Schmid PJ, Nichols JW. Sparsity-promoting dynamic mode decomposition. Physics of Fluids. 2014;26(2):024103. doi:10.1063/1.4863670
4. Kuntz, J.N. et al. (2016) Dynamic Mode Decomposition: Data Driven Modeling of Complex Systems. Siam.
5. Ilicak E, Ozdemir S, Zapp J, Schad LR, Zöllner FG. Dynamic mode decomposition of dynamic MRI for assessment of pulmonary ventilation and perfusion. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine. 2023;90(2):761-769. doi:10.1002/mrm.29656
6. Tian Y, Mendes J, Pedgaonkar A, Ibrahim M, Jensen L, Schroeder JD, Wilson B, DiBella EVR, Adluru G. Feasibility of multiple-view myocardial perfusion MRI using radial simultaneous multi-slice acquisitions. PLoS One 2019;14(2):e0211738.
7. Kim YC, Katsamanis N, Proctor M, Narayanan S, Nayak KS. Pseudo golden-ratio spiral imaging with gradient acoustic noise cancellation: application to real-time MRI of fluent speech. Proc. ISMRM 2012.
8. Campbell-Washburn AE, Ramasawmy R, Restivo MC, et al. Opportunities in Interventional and Diagnostic Imaging by Using High-Performance Low-Field-Strength MRI. Radiology. 2019;293(2):384-393. doi:10.1148/radiol.2019190452
9. Santos JM, Wright GA, Pauly JM. Flexible real-time magnetic resonance imaging framework. Conf Proc IEEE Eng Med BiolSoc. 2004; 2004:1048-1051
10. Tian Y, Cui SX, Lim Y, Lee NG, Zhao Z, Nayak KS. ‘Contrast-optimal simultaneous multi-slice bSSFP cine cardiac imaging at 0.55 Tesla’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine.
11. Yagiz E, Garg P, Nayak KS, Tian Y. Simultaneous multi-slice real-time cardiac MRI at 0.55T. Proc. ISMRM 2023.
12. Ozaslan IK, Pilanci M, Arikan O. M-IHS: An accelerated randomized preconditioning method avoiding costly matrix decompositions. Linear Algebra and its Applications. 2023;678:57-91. doi:10.1016/j.laa.2023.08.014
13. Ozaslan IK, Pilanci M, Arikan O. Iterative Hessian Sketch with Momentum. In: ICASSP 2019 - 2019 IEEE International Conference on Acoustics, Speech and Signal Processing (ICASSP). IEEE; 2019:7470-7474. doi:10.1109/ICASSP.2019.8682720
Figure 1: Overview of the DMD algorithm showing the input-output relation. a) Given measurements from a dynamic system, DMD extracts the eigenvectors (or DMD modes, Φ), spatial correlations, and the eigenvalues (λ), growth/decay, and oscillations of the underlying dynamics. Input is STCR [6] reconstructed real-time b) adult cardiac images, c) fetal cardiac images. The DMD Modes correspond to DC, and the first harmonics due to b) respiratory and cardiac c) maternal respiratory and fetal cardiac motion are selected and shown together with the temporal frequency and the eigenvalues.
Figure 2: Flowchart of Dynamic Mode Decomposition Filtering. Filtering relies on the observation when the input dynamic system is undersampled; then, some modes contain only the aliasing artifact, and a portion of the remaining modes contain the body motion without the artifact. These two can be separated based on the frequency alone automatically to provide an artifact-reduced output without any iterations. Online DMD Filtering exploits periodicity of the artifacts in pseudo-golden-angle sampling and estimates the aliasing in future frames, based on a ~1-second calibration.
Figure 3: In-vivo cardiac RT-MRI of an adult volunteer experiencing premature ventricular contraction (PVCs) during the study. Irregular beats are highlighted in the line intensity profiles (yellow shading). Temporal resolution was 45ms (8 arms/frame), except for view sharing (90ms, 16 arms sliding; footprint 180ms, 32arms/frame). DMD Filtering was applied to complex images after gridding. DMD Filtering notably captures the irregular wall motion without the temporal blurring present in the view-sharing (indicated by red arrows in the line intensity profiles).
Figure 4: In-vivo comparison results from three real-time fetal cardiac cases. Temporal resolution was set to 45ms (8 arms/frame), except for view sharing (90ms, 16 arms sliding; footprint 180ms, 32arms/frame). DMD Filtering was applied to complex images after gridding. DMD Filtering captured fast fetal cardiac motion without temporal blurring while suppressing aliasing artifacts. View-sharing, however, could not resolve this motion due to its large temporal footprint, as seen in the line intensity profiles.
Figure 5: In-vivo evaluation of Online DMD Filtering. Representative examples of real-time (a) adult, (b) fetal cardiac RT-MRI. Online DMD Filtering provides significant aliasing reduction (compared with undersampled gridding) while having a small temporal footprint of 45ms to avoid temporal blurring (compared with view-shared gridding, 180ms). The additional latency is <20ms/frame. DMD Filtering is also shown for comparison and provides slightly better performance.