Keywords: Neurofluids, Neurofluids, Glymphatics
Motivation: CSF-mediated brain waste clearance is implicated in proteinopathies such as Alzheimer’s disease. A better understanding of clearance mechanics is needed to understand pathological processes.
Goal(s): To quantify flow- and pulsatility dynamics of CSF-motion in the 4th-ventricle using real-time phase contrast (rtPC) with interleaved BOLD-imaging while manipulating flow.
Approach: rtPC is first interleaved with inflow-sensitized EPI to prove the same CSF-fluctuations are captured. Then, we show BOLD-CSF coupling between rtPC and cortical BOLD as well as between inflow-EPI and cortical BOLD during breathing and visual-stimulation paradigms.
Results: rtPC improves characterization of CSF-flow in the 4th-ventricle compared to traditional BOLD-sequences, showing more coherent BOLD-CSF coupling.
Impact: Clinical MR studies are increasingly looking at changes in BOLD-CSF coupling in patient populations as a measure of brain clearance efficiency. By interleaving phase contrast acquisitions with BOLD, we quantify CSF flow dynamics and obtain more robust BOLD-CSF measurements.
1. Williams, S. D. et al. Neural activity induced by sensory stimulation can drive large-scale cerebrospinal fluid flow during wakefulness in humans. PLoS Biol 21, (2023).
2. Fultz, N. E. et al. Coupled electrophysiological, hemodynamic, and cerebrospinal fluid oscillations in human sleep. Science 366, 628-63 (2019).
3. Yildiz, S. et al. Quantifying the influence of respiration and cardiac pulsations on cerebrospinal fluid dynamics using real-time phase-contrast MRI. J Magn Reson Imaging 46, 431–439 (2017).
4. Peirce, J. et al. PsychoPy2: Experiments in behavior made easy. Behav Res Methods 51, 195–203 (2019).
5. Fischl, B. FreeSurfer. NeuroImage 62, 774–781 (2012).
6. Bokil, H., Andrews, P., Kulkarni, J. E., Mehta, S. & Mitra, P. P. Chronux: A platform for analyzing neural signals. J Neurosci Methods 192, 146–151 (2010).
Figure 1. Schematic of the sequence diagram, timings and experiment setup. Experiment 1 used an interleaved real-time phase contrast (rtPC, light-blue) and inflow-EPI sequence (dark-green) to compare CSF measurements at the 4th-ventricle level. Experiments 2-4 used both interleaved rtPC & cortical BOLD and inflow-sensitized EPI & cortical BOLD acquisitions to measure BOLD-CSF coupling during paced breathing and visual stimulation paradigms. Gradient-echo rtPC was chosen over an EPI readout to minimize aliasing artefacts from SENSE, and partial Fourier factors.
Figure 3. CSF (cyan) and negative derivative of cortical BOLD (-ΔBOLD/dt, magenta) signals averaged over breathing paradigms and participants (n=5) measured using (A) rtPC/BOLD and (C) inflow-EPI/BOLD. Coupling between CSF and -ΔBOLD/dt in individual volunteers measured with (B) rtPC/BOLD and (D) Inflow-EPI/BOLD, colors indicate different participants. rtPC provides improved characterization of CSF-flow in the 4th-ventricle compared to traditional inflow-BOLD, as shown by stronger coupling and a lower spread between volunteers in the BOLD-CSF coupling.
Figure 4. Signal averages across visual task blocks and participants (n=5). Visual stimulation paradigm was 10s ON, 10s OFF, providing a 20-second window of alternating CSF and cortical BOLD flow patterns. A: Block average for the rt-PC (cyan) and interleaved -ΔBOLD/dt (red). B: Block average for inflow-sensitized EPI (cyan) and cortical BOLD (red). C: 20s cross-correlation window showing more coherent BOLD-CSF coupling for rtPC-BOLD interleaving (blue, r=0.4, lag=-0.35s) than for inflow-sensitized EPI BOLD (orange, r=0.35, lag=0s).
Figure 5. Resting state BOLD-CSF coupling coherence. A: Averaged (n=5) rtPC time-shifted cross-correlations with interleaved cortical BOLD compared to inflow-EPI and -ΔBOLD/dt. As shown in Fig. 2, CSF signals and especially rtPC are mostly cardiac-driven (FH flow: 0.6 to -1.3 cm/s). B: Signals were <0.4Hz low-pass filtered to aid between-scan comparability. C: <0.1Hz filters for low-frequency oscillations show similar max-peaks but higher between-scan lags (2.1s). Note that max-rho lags between scan types seems to increase as a function of the lower filter threshold.