Shen Zhao1, Junyu Wang1, and Michael Salerno1
1Cardiovascular Medicine, Stanford University, Stanford, CA, United States
Synopsis
Keywords: Myocardium, Perfusion, SMS, CAIPIRINHA
Motivation: Clinical cardiac perfusion captures a limited number of slices sequentially within each heartbeat, causing incomplete left ventricle coverage and potential quantification variability due to different cardiac phases.
Goal(s): To image multiple slices simultaneously thereby reducing quantification variability and improve heart coverage.
Approach: We apply highly accelerated Simultaneous Multi-slice Imaging via Linear phase modulated Extended field of view (SMILE) acquisition and reconstruction framework to cardiac perfusion.
Results: With a high multiband factor and accelerated rate, SMILE perfusion achieve whole heart coverage and allows for more slices to be in the same cardiac phase. Retrospective and prospective experiments validated its good quality.
Impact: The proposed methods can significantly
enhance the heart coverage of clinical cardiac perfusion and potentially benefit reducing
variability in quantitative perfusion assessment.
Introduction
Simultaneous
multi-slice imaging enjoys volumetric imaging SNR efficiency and is
advantageous for time-critical applications[1]. We have previously introduced a novel SMS framework
called Simultaneous Multi-slice Imaging via Linear phase modulated Extended
field of view (SMILE)[2,3], which adopts an extended field of view along the
phase encoding direction enabling standard parallel-imaging-based
reconstruction. Our previous work demonstrated that SMILE can provide bias-free
and content-independent reconstruction with a theoretical guarantee, eliminating slice leakage, as long as
the calibration region and reconstruction method adopt the appropriate k-space
kernel size.
In conventional cardiac perfusion imaging, a
limited number of single-slice images are acquired sequentially within each
heartbeat. Even with a small multiband factor (MB) in SMS, images are collected
throughout the cardiac cycle to cover the entire heart. Using a higher MB can
expand cardiac perfusion coverage, capturing more images during the same
cardiac phase, potentially reducing image quantification variability across
different cardiac cycle phases[4].Methods
Retrospectively
downsampled perfusion study: 11 patient perfusion datasets (D1~D11) comprising five
slices, with R=2 uniformly downsampling were collected. Per frame HICU[5]
reconstruction (HICU 2D) served as ground truth. The calibration data acquired
for each slice were transformed for use in conventional SMS acquisition with
CAIPIRINHA phase modulation and SMILE acquisition. Both CAIPIRINHA and SMILE
had a simulated net acceleration of R=10. For CAIPIRINHA, R equates to the
multiband (MB) factor times in-plane acceleration rate, while for SMILE, R
represents total in-plane acceleration. The reconstruction methods include Slice
GRAPPA (SG)[6], Split-Slice GRAPPA (SPSG)[7], ROCK-SPIRIT[8], and HICU. SG
and SPSG were exclusively compatible with uniform downsampling and were
followed by in-plane GRAPPA reconstruction (G). For other reconstruction methods, we also utilized a variable density sampling CAVA[9]. Images were compared based on reconstruction signal to error ratio (SER) and structural similarity index (SSIM), where SER is defined as $$$\frac{ \|\hat{\mathbb{K}} - \mathbb{K} \|_\textsf{F}}{\|\mathbb{K}\|_\textsf{F}}$$$, $$$\hat{\mathbb{K}}$$$ is the reconstructed k-space and $$$\|\cdot\|_\textsf{F}$$$ denotes Frobenius norm.
Prospectively
downsampled perfusion study: We performed SMILE perfusion imaging on 8
patients using a 3T Siemens Skyra Scanner, with MB = 5 and net R = 10. We
acquired 10 slices with 1.5 mm in-plane resolution for whole-heart coverage
using the CAVA pattern. Images were reconstructed using 2D+t HICU
reconstruction (HICU). Temporal fidelity was assessed with per-frame 2D HICU
reconstruction (HICU 2D), considered as the gold standard as per-frame
reconstruction should not disrupt temporal fidelity. Images were graded by a cardiologist on a 5-point
scale (1 poor to 5 excellent).Results
Figure.1
depicts the SMILE perfusion acquisition pipeline for a MB=5 acquisition.
Figure.2
shows the radar plots of SER and SSIM, SMILE + HICU 2D reaches the highest reconstruction quality in
both metrics.
Figure.3
shows one representative frame comparing the reconstruction results of
different acquisition and reconstruction combinations. We can observe severe
slice leakage for CAIPIRINHA regardless of the reconstruction methods.
Figure.4 shows one of the representative frames of prospectively undersampled SMILE
perfusion at MB=5, R=10. Two slice groups of 5 slices within one heartbeat are
reorganized following apical to basal direction to be horizontally concatenated
for illustration.
Figure.5 shows the temporal fidelity of the 2D+t
HICU reconstruction compared with HICU 2D, of different regions of interest
(ROI), HICU reconstruction is of good agreement with the HICU 2D reconstruction
in terms of temporal fidelity. Image
quality scores for the 8 HICU reconstruction is 4.1 $$$\pm$$$ 0.6.Discussion and Conclusions
Perfusion
imaging presents challenges for SMS due to significant signal intensity changes
between perfusion frames and calibration data. Notably, there is pronounced
slice leakage in frames acquired before the contrast agent arrives for
CAIPIRINHA acquisition. However, experimental validation has shown that SMILE
perfusion, even with high multiband factors and substantial acceleration
rates and variable density sampling pattern, produces high-quality images
without slice leakage, allowing for comprehensive coverage of the entire heart.
This approach enables the acquisition of five slices during a single phase of
the cardiac cycle, facilitating future quantitative perfusion analysis.Acknowledgements
This
project is funded by NIH
R01 HL131919, NIH
R01 HL155962-01.References
1. Barth, Markus, et al. "Simultaneous
multislice (SMS) imaging techniques." Magnetic resonance in medicine 75.1
(2016): 63-81.
2. Zhao, S., Wang, X., Wang, J., Salerno,
M. “Simultaneous Multislice Imaging via Linear Phase Modulated Extended Field
of View (SMILE) for Cardiac Cine and Perfusion.” Proc. 26th SCMR Scientific
Session. 2023
3. Zhao, S., Wang, J., Salerno,
M. “Accelerated Simultaneous Multislice Imaging via Linear Phase Modulated
Extended Field of View (SMILE)” Proc. 32nd ISMRM Meeting & Exhibition,
Toronto, Canada, 2023, p. 0869.
4. Motwani, Manish, et al.
"Quantitative three-dimensional cardiovascular magnetic resonance
myocardial perfusion imaging in systole and diastole." Journal of
Cardiovascular Magnetic Resonance 16 (2014): 1-11.
5. Zhao, Shen, Lee C. Potter, and Rizwan
Ahmad. "High‐dimensional
fast convolutional framework (HICU) for calibrationless MRI." Magnetic
Resonance in Medicine 86.3 (2021): 1212-1225.
6. Setsompop, Kawin, et al. "Blipped‐controlled aliasing
in parallel imaging for simultaneous multislice echo planar imaging with
reduced g‐factor
penalty." Magnetic resonance in medicine 67.5 (2012): 1210-1224.
7. Cauley, Stephen F., et al.
"Interslice leakage artifact reduction technique for simultaneous
multislice acquisitions." Magnetic resonance in medicine 72.1 (2014):
93-102.
8. Demirel, Omer Burak, et al.
"Improved simultaneous multislice cardiac MRI using readout concatenated k‐space SPIRiT (ROCK‐SPIRiT)."
Magnetic resonance in medicine 85.6 (2021): 3036-3048.
9. Rich, Adam, et al. "CArtesian
sampling with Variable density and Adjustable temporal resolution (CAVA)."
Magnetic resonance in medicine 83.6 (2020): 2015-2025.