Keywords: Functional Connectivity, fMRI (resting state), Major depressive disorder; Global signal topography
Motivation: Global signal (GS) distribution changes remain unclear in major depressive disorder (MDD).
Goal(s): This study aimed to explore abnormal GS topography in MDD, and its underlying structural mechanism and relationship with clinical assessments.
Approach: We used resting-state fMRI and T1-weighted data from the REST-meta-MDD consortium, and calculated the GS correlation (GSCORR) and gray matter volume (GMV).
Results: We found decreased GS topography in sensorimotor networks in recurrent MDD, and altered GMV-GSCORR coupling in cingulo-opercular and frontoparietal/occipital networks in first-episode and recurrent MDD, respectively. The alterations of GS topography in temporal lobe and cerebellum correlated with HAMD/HAMA scores, which were partially mediated by GMV.
Impact: Our findings demonstrated that first-episode and recurrent MDD showed different alterations in GS topography, which were associated with cortical GMV and clinical symptoms of patients, contributing to the understanding of relationship between global and local neuronal activities in MDD.
This work is supported by the Chu Kochen Honors College Foundation.
1 Chen P, Zhao K, Zhang H, et al. Altered global signal topography in Alzheimer’s disease. eBioMedicine. 2023;89:104455.
2 Aquino KM, Fulcher BD, Parkes L, Sabaroedin K, Fornito A. Identifying and removing widespread signal deflections from fMRI data: Rethinking the global signal regression problem. NeuroImage. 2020;212:116614.
3 Power JD, Barnes KA, Snyder AZ, Schlaggar BL, Petersen SE. Spurious but systematic correlations in functional connectivity MRI networks arise from subject motion. NeuroImage. 2012;63(2):999.
4 Chen X, Liao X, Dai Z, et al. Topological analyses of functionalconnectomics: a crucial role of global signal removal, brain parcellation, and null models. Hum Brain Mapp. 2018;39(11):4545–4564.
5 Fox MD, Zhang D, Snyder AZ, Raichle ME. The global signal and observed anticorrelated resting state brain networks. J Neurophysiol. 2009;101(6):3270–3283.
6 Gulino G, Scalabrini A, Paolini M, Palladini M, Benedetti F. Global signal topography of the depressive syndrome in bipolar disorder. European Psychiatry. 2023;66(S1):S549-S549.
7 Scalabrini A, Vai B, Poletti S, et al. All roads lead to the default-mode network—global source of DMN abnormalities in major depressive disorder. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;45(12):2058-2069.
8 Han S, Wang X, He Z, et al. Decreased static and increased dynamic global signal topography in major depressive disorder. Progress in Neuro-Psychopharmacology and Biological Psychiatry. 2019;94:109665.
9 Yan CG, Chen X, Li L, et al. Reduced default mode network functional connectivity in patients with recurrent major depressive disorder. PNAS. 2019;116(18):9078-9083.
10 Dosenbach N U F, Nardos B, Cohen A L, et al. Prediction of individual brain maturity using fMRI. Science. 2010;329(5997): 1358-1361.
11 Yang H, Chen X, Chen ZB, et al. Disrupted intrinsic functional brain topology in patients with major depressive disorder. Mol Psychiatry. 2021;26(12):7363-7371.
12 Jiang H, Zhu R, Tian S, et al. Structural–functional decoupling predicts suicide attempts in bipolar disorder patients with a current major depressive episode. Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020;45(10):1735-1742.
Figure 1 (A) Averaged GSCORR values for each group. The size of the node represents the averaged value of GSCORR in the brain region. (B) GSCORR differences between groups at the whole brain level. The positive and negative t values represented higher and lower GSCORR values in the former group than the latter group, respectively. Recurrent MDD showed decreased GSCORR compared with both NC and FEDN. MDD: major depressive disorder; NC: normal control; FEDN: first-episode drug-naïve; RMDD: recurrent major depressive disorder; FEM: first-episode on medication. *: P < 0.05; **: P < 0.01.
Figure 2 (A) Illustration of occipital and sensorimotor networks. (B) GSCORR differences between groups at the brain network level. The violins showed distributions of GSCORR values for each network in each group. RMDD showed decreased GSCORR in the occipital network compared with both NC and FEDN, while FEM showed decreased GSCORR in the sensorimotor network compared with FEDN. CEN: cerebellum network; CON: cingulo-opercular network; DMN: default mode network; FPN: frontal-parietal network; ON: occipital network; SEN: sensorimotor network.*: P < 0.05.
Figure 3 GSCORR differences between groups at the regional level. The regions that survived after FDR correction (P < 0.05) are shown. The size of the nodes represents the t-value derived from LMM. Total MDD and RMDD both showed decreased GSCORR in regions within sensorimotor and occipital networks, and RMDD also showed reduced GSCORR in regions within the cingulo-opercular network and default mode network compared with NC. FEDN showed increased GSCORR in regions within sensorimotor and occipital networks compared with FEM and RMDD.
Figure 5 (A) Relationships between HAMD/HAMA scores and GSCORR. We observed significant positive correlations between HAMD score and GSCORR in superior temporal lobe and cerebellum, and between HAMA score and GSCORR in middle temporal lobe across total MDD patients. (B) Mediation effect. The GMV/GSCORR in the superior temporal region showed an indirect effect on the relationship between GSCORR/GMV in this region and HAMD score. ***: P < 0.001.