Keywords: Image Reconstruction, Spectroscopy
Motivation: To further accelerate high-resolution MRSI acquisitions leveraging parallel imaging.
Goal(s): While standard parallel imaging techniques such as (k,t)-GRAPPA can interpolate the sparsely sampled (k,t)-space in MRSI, learning-based nonlinear interpolation has demonstrated better performance in parallel MRI. But these methods have not effectively utilized the time/free induction decay (FID) dimension, which should be leveraged to improve interpolation accuracy.
Approach: We adapted and extended the RAKI method by incorporating the FID dimension, via a 3D, complex-valued convolutional network, for MRSI reconstruction.
Results: Our method effectively reconstructed data for different undersampling designs in in vivo MRSI, leading to improved subsequent spatiospectral processing results.
Impact: We presented a self-supervised learning-based (k,t)-space interpolation method, (k,t)-RAKI, that is useful for further accelerating MRSI acquisition, in combination with subspace methods.
[1] Banerjee, Suchandrima, Esin Ozturk-Isik, Sarah J. Nelson, and Sharmila Majumdar. ‘Fast Magnetic Resonance Spectroscopic Imaging at 3 Tesla Using Autocalibrating Parallel Technique’. Conference Proceedings: ... Annual International Conference of the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society. Annual Conference 2006 (2006): 1866–69. https://doi.org/10.1109/IEMBS.2006.260659.
[2]Griswold, Mark A., Peter M. Jakob, Robin M. Heidemann, Mathias Nittka, Vladimir Jellus, Jianmin Wang, Berthold Kiefer, and Axel Haase. ‘Generalized Autocalibrating Partially Parallel Acquisitions (GRAPPA)’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 47, no. 6 (June 2002): 1202–10. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.10171.
[3] Pruessmann, K. P., M. Weiger, M. B. Scheidegger, and P. Boesiger. ‘SENSE: Sensitivity Encoding for Fast MRI’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 42, no. 5 (November 1999): 952–62.
[4] Chang, Yuchou, Dong Liang, and Leslie Ying. ‘Nonlinear GRAPPA: A Kernel Approach to Parallel MRI Reconstruction’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 68, no. 3 (2012): 730–40. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.23279.
[5] Akçakaya, Mehmet, Steen Moeller, Sebastian Weingärtner, and Kâmil Uğurbil. ‘Scan-Specific Robust Artificial-Neural-Networks for k-Space Interpolation (RAKI) Reconstruction: Database-Free Deep Learning for Fast Imaging’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 81, no. 1 (January 2019): 439–53. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27420.
[6] Dawood, Peter, Felix Breuer, Jannik Stebani, Paul Burd, István Homolya, Johannes Oberberger, Peter M. Jakob, and Martin Blaimer. ‘Iterative Training of Robust K-Space Interpolation Networks for Improved Image Reconstruction with Limited Scan Specific Training Samples’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 89, no. 2 (2023): 812–27. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.29482.
[7] Nassirpour, Sahar, Paul Chang, and Anke Henning. ‘MultiNet PyGRAPPA: Multiple Neural Networks for Reconstructing Variable Density GRAPPA (a 1H FID MRSI Study)’. NeuroImage 183 (1 December 2018): 336–45. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.08.032.
[8] Breuer, Felix A., Martin Blaimer, Matthias F. Mueller, Nicole Seiberlich, Robin M. Heidemann, Mark A. Griswold, and Peter M. Jakob. ‘Controlled Aliasing in Volumetric Parallel Imaging (2D CAIPIRINHA)’. Magnetic Resonance in Medicine 55, no. 3 (2006): 549–56. https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.20787.
In this figure, only ky dimension is undersampled by R=3, the other dimensions (kx, kz, time) are fully sampled. Using dilated (by R) convolutional kernels in the first layer, RAKI successfully controls aliasing and outperforms GRAPPA in all time points. This figure gives an example of the reconstruction result at the 3rd time slice. The kernel sizes of the 3D-CNN are 2x5x2, 1x1x1, 1x5x1, respectively. The input data size is (ky=74, kx=74, kz=20, time=150, coil=16).
In this figure, ky and time dimension are undersampled by 3x3 CAIPIRINHA, the other dimensions (kx, kz) are fully sampled. Using customized convolutional kernels in the first layer, RAKI successfully controls aliasing and outperforms GRAPPA in all time points. This figure gives an example of the reconstruction result at the 3rd time slice. The kernel sizes of the 3D-CNN are 3x5x3, 1x1x1, 1x3x1, respectively. The input data size is (ky=74, kx=74, kz=20, time=150, coil=16).
In vivo 1H-MRSI results from a healthy volunteer: The top panel compares metabolite maps of NAA, Cr and Cho from fully sampled data (left section) and (k,t)-RAKI reconstructed data (right section). The bottom panel compares reconstructed spectra, with voxel locations marked by the blue triangle shown in the T1 -weighted anatomical image. High resemblance between (k,t)-RAKI results and fully sampled (k,t)-space can be observed in our reconstruction.
Gaussian noise equivalent to 0.5% of the peak magnitude of the (k,t)-space signal was intentionally introduced to the entire (k,t)-space for assessing network robustness. The results demonstrate that (k,t)-RAKI maintains excellent performance even in the presence of added noise, with minimal impact on reconstruction quality, surpassing (k,t)-GRAPPA. Furthermore, a comparison with t by t RAKI reveals that temporal information aids the network in mitigating noise-related effects.