Chen Qian1, Mingyang Han1, Feiqiang Guan1, Yucheng Guo1, Zhigang Wu1, Jiangzheng Wang2, Boyu Jiang3, Ran Tao3, Liuhong Zhu4, Di Guo5, Jianjun Zhou4, and Xiaobo Qu1
1Xiamen University, Xiamen, China, 2Philips Healthcare, Beijing, China, 3United Imaging Healthcare, Shanghai, China, 4Department of Radiology, Zhongshan Hospital (Xiamen), Fudan University, Xiamen, China, 5Xiamen University of Technology, Xiamen, China
Synopsis
Keywords: Diffusion Reconstruction, Diffusion/other diffusion imaging techniques
Motivation: State-of-the-art low-rank methods recover multi-shot DWI with 2D structured matrix completion, but are hindered by long computation time (tens of minutes per image) and unsatisfactory ultra-high shot reconstruction (no more than 8-shot).
Goal(s): Fast and reliable ultra-high (above 8-shot) DWI reconstruction.
Approach: ODLRS: A 1D low-rank Hankel reconstruction method with self-adaptive subspace.
Results: ODLRS is a novel 1D low-rank framework for multi-shot DWI reconstruction. Compared to conventional low-rank methods, ODLRS achieves 109 times accelerated reconstruction, and low-distortion spine DWI with 12 shots.S
Impact: This
work achieves fast (109 times acceleration) and reliable ultra-high (10 and 12 shots)
DWI reconstruction, reducing the deformation of conventional spinal cord DWI
significantly.
Introduction
Multi-shot interleaved echo planer imaging
(ms-iEPI) can obtain DWI with reduced distortions [1, 2] than single-shot EPI. The higher the
number of excitations, the lower the image distortion [3]. State-of-the-art
low-rank methods with 2D structured matrix completion,
such as MUSSELS [4] and PAIR [5], have shown nice performance on high-shot
number data reconstructions (6~8 shots). However, extremely long computational
time (tens of minutes per image) are huge limitations for the practical
application of these methods. Moreover, when the shot number increased further
(10 and 12 shots), these methods may be unsatisfactory.
In this work, we propose a 1D low-rank model [6, 7] with self-adaptive subspace (ODLRS) for
low-distortion DWI reconstruction, obtaining 109 times computation acceleration
and stable performance at ultra-high shot reconstruction (12-shot).Method
In this work, we attempt to establish a
framework to enable fast and reliable 1D low-rank ms-iEPI DWI reconstructions.
Inspired by separable low-rank methods in fast MRI, we first propose ODLR,
which replaces the large 2D block Hankel matrix with multiple small 1D Hankel matrices
(Fig. 1(a)). Since the SVD time of multiple 1D Hankel matrices is largely
reduced than the original 2D block Hankel matrix, ODLR accelerates the
reconstruction by about 4 times. However, ODLR has two weaknesses that can be
further optimized. The former is the slow convergence speed, and the latter is
the unstable performance under ultra-high shot reconstruction.
We further propose the ODLR with self-adaptive subspace (ODLRS)
reconstruction, which obtain about 109 times acceleration and better
reconstruction performance. In the first step of ODLRS, strong subspace is
calculated from the pre-reconstructed k-space center (Fig. 1(b)), and
incorporated into the reconstruction model. In the second step, uncertain
subspace is estimated with 1D low-rank constraint. This adaptive subspace
strategy greatly reduces the degree of freedom and reconstruction difficulty of
the problem to be solved. The proposed subspace reconstruction in DWI can be
further employed in other MRI reconstruction problems, such as fast MRI.Results
We conducted extensive experiments on two datasets
of healthy volunteers to validate the performance of ODLRS. The DATASET I is obtained
on the United Imaging 3.0T uMR 790 scanner, channel = 24, shot = 12, matrix
size = 224×224,
diffusion direction = 3, b-value = 0, and 1000 s/mm2, slice thickness
= 4 mm. The DATASET II is obtained on the Philips 3.0T Ingenia CX scanner,
channel = 16, shot = 4, 6, 8, 10, matrix size = 168×262, diffusion direction = 3, b-value = 0, and 1000
s/mm2, slice thickness = 4 mm.
In Fig. 2, the widely employed MUSE [9] failed to provide reasonable results on 12-shot
reconstructions (Fig. 2(b)). MUSSELS [4] and PAIR [5] are reported to achieve better performance than
MUSE under high shot number scenarios (4-8 shots). However, for 12-shot DWI
reconstruction, they are also hard to provide satisfactory results and produce
structural mistakes (yellow arrows in Fig. 2(c) and (d)). Moreover, the
computational time of MUSSELS and PAIR reach 23458.2 and 9806.1 seconds per
image, respectively. This is unacceptable in practical applications.
ODLRS removes the motion artifacts
better than all comparison methods and provides the best reconstructed 12-shot
DWI image (Fig. 2(e)). Moreover, it improves the reconstruction speed by about
a factor of 100 (89.8 seconds).
The extensive study on the cervical
spine DWI (Fig. 3) demonstrates that ODLRS performs well on multi-shot iEPI DWI
from 4-shot to 10-shot, which brings great EPI distortion suppressions.
However, PAIR cannot reconstruct spine DWI images well when the shot number is
high (Fig. 3(c)-(e)).
We further explore why ODLRS
performs better than PAIR at ultra-high shot reconstructions through shot phase
analysis. The shot phase provided by PAIR is good at 4-shot but poor at 10-shot
(Fig. 4(a)). While in the ODLRS (Fig. 4(c)), shot phases are significantly
better than PAIR at 10-shot data (Fig. 4(b)), which may be
attributed to reliable pre-reconstruction
(strong subspace extracted from pre-reconstruction visualized in Fig. 4(b)).Conclusion
In conclusion, we propose ODLRS, a novel 1D low-rank DWI
reconstruction model with a self-adaptive subspace. Extensive experiments show
that ODLRS achieves fast (109 times acceleration) and
reliable ultra-high (10 and 12 shots) DWI reconstruction, reducing the
deformation of conventional spinal cord DWI significantly.Acknowledgements
This work was supported in part by the National Natural
Science Foundation of China under grants 61971361, 62122064, and 62331021,
Natural Science Foundation of Fujian Province of China under grants 2023J02005,
President Fund of Xiamen University under grant 20720220063, and Xiamen
University Nanqiang Outstanding Talents Program.References
[1] H.
An, X. Ma, Z. Pan, H. Guo, and E. Y. P. Lee, “Qualitative and quantitative
comparison of image quality between single-shot echo-planar and interleaved
multi-shot echo-planar diffusion-weighted imaging in female pelvis,” European Radiology, vol. 30, no. 4, pp.
1876-1884, 2020.
[2] G.
C. Baxter, A. J. Patterson, R. Woitek, I. Allajbeu, M. J. Graves, and F.
Gilbert, “Improving the image quality of DWI in breast cancer: Comparison of
multi-shot DWI using multiplexed sensitivity encoding to conventional single-shot
echo-planar imaging DWI,” The British
Journal of Radiology, vol. 94, no. 1119, p. 20200427, 2021.
[3] X.
Ma, Z. Zhang, E. Dai, and H. Guo, “Improved multi-shot diffusion imaging using
GRAPPA with a compact kernel,” NeuroImage,
vol. 138, pp. 88-99, 2016.
[4] M.
Mani, H. K. Aggarwal, V. Magnotta, and M. Jacob, “Improved MUSSELS
reconstruction for high-resolution multi-shot diffusion weighted imaging,” Magnetic Resonance in Medicine, vol. 83,
no. 6, pp. 2253-2263, 2020.
[5] C.
Qian et al., “A paired phase and
magnitude reconstruction for advanced diffusion-weighted imaging,” IEEE Transactions on Biomedical Engineering,
DOI: 10.1109/TBME.2023.3288031, 2023.
[6] X.
Zhang et al., “Accelerated MRI
reconstruction with separable and enhanced Low-Rank Hankel regularization,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging,
vol. 41, no. 9, pp. 2486-2498, 2022.
[7] Z.
Wang et al., “One-dimensional deep
Low-rank and sparse network for accelerated MRI,” IEEE Transactions on Medical Imaging, vol. 42, no. 1, pp. 79-90,
2023.
[8] D.
Guo et al. “XCloud-VIP: Virtual peak
enables highly accelerated NMR spectroscopy and faithful quantitative measures,”
IEEE Transactions on Computational
Imaging, DOI: 10.1109/TCI.2023.3330298, 2023.
[9] N. k.
Chen, A. Guidon, H. C. Chang, and A. W. Song, “A robust multi-shot scan
strategy for high-resolution diffusion weighted MRI enabled by multiplexed
sensitivity-encoding (MUSE),” NeuroImage,
vol. 72, pp. 41-47, 2013.