Keywords: Data Processing, COVID-19, statistical models, clinical scores, fatigue, anosmia, cognitive impairment, multimodal qMRI
Motivation: Long-COVID is a disabling health problem caused by SARS-COV-2 syndrome, whose underlying biological mechanisms are still debated.
Goal(s): This study aimed at finding the set of quantitative MRI (qMRI) metrics that best correlate with fatigue, smell (i.e. anosmia),and cognitive dysfunction, common in this condition.
Approach: People with COVID19 history with and without long-COVID were assessed through a multimodal one-hour-long qMRI protocol and underwent clinical evaluation.
Results: Correlation analyses between qMRI metrics and clinical scores showed that neurite density index changes explain both fatigue and smell function (also affected by changes in brain stem volume),while mean diffusivity and magnetic susceptibility changes explain cognitive function.
Impact: This work sheds light on the underlying biological mechanisms of long-COVID (anosmia, fatigue, and cognitive impairment). Metrics sensitive to microstructure, inflammation and possible iron accumulation best explain persistent symptoms, emphasizing the role of multimodal qMRI in the clinic.
[1] Davis, Hannah E., et al. “Long-COVID: major findings, mechanisms and recommendations”. Nature Reviews Microbiology, Volume 21, March 2023, 133–146
[2] Patil S.V., et al., “‘Long-COVID’ is more common, underestimated, and ‘core’ health issue in post covid care setting: study of 6000 cases in tertiary care setting in India”, European Respiratory Journal, Volume 60, April 2022, 10.1183/13993003.congress-2022.576
[3] Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott et al., Advanced magnetic resonance imaging to study brain tissue alterations in people infected with SARS-COV-2, ISMRM 2021
[4] Wingrove et al., Persistent anosmia following COVID-19 results in significant connectivity differences within olfactory regions: a resting state fMRI analysis, ISMRM Annual Meeting 2022
[5] Grosso et al., Quantitative Susceptibility Mapping and 𝜒- separation method: how MRI can help us understand COVID-19, Human Brain Project Summit 2023
[6] Ricciardi et al., Advanced magnetic resonance imaging to study brain alterations in people infected with SARS-COV2, Human Brain Project Summit 2023
[7] Afsahi AM, et al., Brain MRI findings in neurologically symptomatic COVID-19 patients: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Neurol. 2023 Aug 3. doi: 10.1007/s00415-023-11914-9. Epub ahead of print. PMID: 37535100.
[8] Yücepur C, Ozücer B, Değirmenci N, Yıldırım Y, Veyseller B, Ozturan O. University of Pennsylvania smell identification test: application to Turkish population. Kulak Burun Bogaz Ihtis Derg. 2012 Mar-Apr;22(2):77-80. doi: 10.5606/kbbihtisas.2012.014. PMID: 22548263.
[9] Ryan J, Woods RL, Britt CJ, Murray AM, Shah RC, Reid CM, Wolfe R, Nelson MR, Orchard SG, Lockery JE, Trevaks RE, Storey E; behalf of the ASPREE Investigator Group on. Normative Data for the Symbol Digit Modalities Test in Older White Australians and Americans, African-Americans, and Hispanic/Latinos. J Alzheimers Dis Rep. 2020 Aug 4;4(1):313-323. doi: 10.3233/ADR-200194. PMID: 33024939; PMCID: PMC7504980.
[10] Larson RD. Psychometric properties of the modified fatigue impact scale. Int J MS Care. 2013 Spring;15(1):15-20. doi: 10.7224/1537-2073.2012-019. PMID: 24453758; PMCID: PMC3883028.[11] Grussu, F., Battiston, M., Veraart, J., Schneider, T., Cohen-Adad, J., Shepherd, T.M., Alexander, D.C., Fieremans, E., Novikov, D.S. and Wheeler-Kingshott, C.A.G., 2020. Multi-parametric quantitative in vivo spinal cord MRI with unified signal readout and image denoising. Neuroimage, 217, p.116884.
[12] Fick Rutger H. J., et al., The Dmipy Toolbox: Diffusion MRI Multi-Compartment Modeling and Microstructure Recovery Made Easy, Frontiers in Neuroinformatics, Vol.13, 2019, DOI=10.3389/fninf.2019.00064, ISSN=1662-5196
[13] Francesco Grussu. (2021). fragrussu/MyRelax: Public API 1.0.0 (1.0.0). Zenodo. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4561898
[14] Liu T, Liu J, de Rochefort L, et al., Morphology enabled dipole inversion (MEDI) from a single angle acquisition: comparison with COSMOS in human brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2011 Apr 4. doi: 10.1002/mrm.22816 / PMID: 21465541
[15] Shin,H.G, Lee, J. et al., χ-separation: Magnetic susceptibility source separation toward iron and myelin mapping in the brain, NeuroImage, Volume 240, 2021, 118371, ISSN 1053-8119, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.118371.
[16] Cardoso MJ, Modat M, et al., Geodesic Information Flows: Spatially-Variant Graphs and Their Application to Segmentation and Fusion. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Sep;34(9):1976-88. doi: 10.1109/TMI.2015.2418298. Epub 2015 Apr 14. PMID: 25879909.
[17] Valverde, Sergi, et al. “One-shot domain adaptation in multiple sclerosis lesion segmentation using convolutional neural networks” https://arxiv.org/abs/1805.12415
[18] Ferran Prados, M. Jorge Cardoso, Ninon Burgos, Claudia AM Wheeler-Kingshott, Sebastien Ourselin. NiftyWeb: web based platform for image processing on the cloud. International Society for Magnetic Resonance in Medicine (ISMRM) 24th Scientific Meeting and Exhibition - Singapore 2016
[19] H P, Vinutha & Poornima, B. & Sagar, B., (2018). Detection of Outliers Using Interquartile Range Technique from Intrusion Dataset. 10.1007/978-981-10-7563
[20] RStudio Team (2020). RStudio: Integrated Development for R. RStudio, PBC, Boston, MA URL http://www.rstudio.com/.
[21] Fu X, Lu Z, Wang Y, Huang L, Wang X, Zhang H, Xiao Z. A Clinical Research Study of Cognitive Dysfunction and Affective Impairment after Isolated Brainstem Stroke. Front Aging Neurosci. 2017 Dec 19;9:400. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2017.00400. PMID: 29311895; PMCID: PMC57422
Figure 1| Database table. First column represents the total number of subjects acquired for each group (COVID and long-COVID) together with their age and sex. In the other columns the number of subjects who underwent UPSIT–smell function test (blue), SDMT-cognitive function test (green), and MFIS–fatigue test (orange) are reported per group. All COVID and long-COVID subjects were entered in the statistical analyses as one group, where scores reflected the presence or absence of certain symptoms.
Figure 2| Statistical method. First, mean of all the qMRI metrics were computed in the white matter (WM), cortical and deep grey matter (cGM, dGM), and in the brain stem (BS). Then, a first model selection was performed identifying the best regional set of predictors. Finally, a second model selection was run, identifying the best final set of predictors for each of the symptoms (smell function, cognitive function and fatigue).
Figure 3| Quantitative MRI maps and descriptive analysis. Overview of all the quantitative maps obtained from the multimodal MRI protocol associated with a boxplot representing the subjects’ mean values distribution. BPF = bound pool fraction; MTV = macromolecular tissue volume, T2b = T2 of bound protons; QSM = quantitative susceptibility mapping; χneg = negative susceptibility; χpos = positive susceptibility; NDI = neurite density index; VFiso = isotropic volume fraction; ODI = orientation dispersion index; MD = mean diffusivity; FA = fractional anisotropy.
Figure 4| Test score models. First column represents the correlation between each of the MRI metrics and smell function (a), cognitive function (b) and fatigue (c). Second column represents the best set of predictors for each ROI as a result of the first model selection. Straight arrows represent positive correlations while dotted arrows represent negative correlations. Bold metrics are those with p<0.01, non-bold ones correlate with p<0.05.
Figure 5| Symptoms best models. Box a) contains smell function best model: greater volume in brain stem (BS) and greater neurite density index (NDI) in cortical grey matter (cGM) are associated with better smell function scores (R2=0.18). Box b) contains cognitive function best model: lower mean diffusivity (MD) in the BS and lower quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) in the deep grey matter are associated with better cognitive function (R2=0.36). Box c) contains fatigue best model: greater cGM NDI is associated with worse fatigue (R2=0.23).