Keywords: Other Neurodegeneration, Neurodegeneration, Wilson's disease; 7T MRI; biomarker; metal deposition pattern
Motivation: Excessive subcortical metal deposition seen on susceptibility imaging has suggested a characteristic pattern in neurological Wilson’s disease (NWD).
Goal(s): To develop a novel imaging biomarker of NWD using 7T SWI.
Approach: WD patients, monoallelic ATP7B variant carriers, health controls, and patients with comparable clinical or imaging manifestations were recruited for development of a novel biomarker of NWD and exploratory comparative analysis. All underwent 7T SWI with quantitative susceptibility mapping and principal component analysis performed.
Results: The novel biomarker of NWD termed "hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign" showed high diagnostic accuracy. It revealed a special metal deposition pattern in the lenticular nucleus in NWD.
Impact: A novel imaging biomarker of neurological Wilson’s disease (NWD) termed "hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign" could aid the diagnosis and monitoring of NWD.
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 82271459 and No. 82071422) and Natural Science Foundation of Beijing Municipality (No. 7212031). We would like to acknowledge the support of the participants and their families for taking part in the study. We thank all research staff at the four participating sites and Dr. Michael L. Schilsky for revision of the manuscript. Their dedication made the study feasible.
The authors report no competing interests.
1. Czlonkowska A, Litwin T, Dusek P, et al. Wilson disease. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2018 Sep 6;4(1):21.
2. Ferenci P, Caca K, Loudianos G, et al. Diagnosis and phenotypic classification of Wilson disease. Liver international : official journal of the International Association for the Study of the Liver. 2003;23(3):139-42.
3. Shribman S, Poujois A, Bandmann O, Czlonkowska A, Warner TT. Wilson's disease: update on pathogenesis, biomarkers and treatments. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2021 Oct;92(10):1053-61.
4. Beinhardt S, Leiss W, Stättermayer AF, et al. Long-term outcomes of patients with Wilson disease in a large Austrian cohort. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2014;12(4):683-9.
5. Merle U, Schaefer M, Ferenci P, Stremmel W. Clinical presentation, diagnosis and long-term outcome of Wilson's disease: a cohort study. Gut. 2007;56(1):115-20.
6. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Wilson's disease. Journal of hepatology. 2012;56(3):671-85.
7. Das SK, Ray K. Wilson's disease: an update. Nat Clin Pract Neurol. 2006;2(9):482-93.
8. Dusek P, Bahn E, Litwin T, et al. Brain iron accumulation in Wilson disease: a post mortem 7 Tesla MRI - histopathological study. Neuropathol Appl Neurobiol. 2017 Oct;43(6):514-32.
9. Litwin T, Gromadzka G, Szpak G, Jabłonka-Salach K, Bulska E, Członkowska A. Brain metal accumulation in Wilson's disease. Journal of the neurological sciences. 2013;329:55-8.
10. Li G, Wu R, Tong R, et al. Quantitative Measurement of Metal Accumulation in Brain of Patients With Wilson's Disease. Movement disorders : official journal of the Movement Disorder Society. 2020;35(10):1787-95.
11. Dusek P, Lescinskij A, Ruzicka F, et al. Associations of Brain Atrophy and Cerebral Iron Accumulation at MRI with Clinical Severity in Wilson Disease. Radiology. 2021;299(3):662-72.
12. Su D, Zhang Z, Zhang Z, et al. Microstructural and functional impairment of the basal ganglia in Wilson's disease: a multimodal neuroimaging study. Frontiers In Neuroscience. 2023;17:1146644.
13. Cong F, Liu X, Liu C, et al. Improved depiction of subthalamic nucleus and globus pallidus internus with optimized high-resolution quantitative susceptibility mapping at 7 T. NMR in biomedicine. 2020;33(11):e4382.
14. Yao B, Li T, Gelderen P, Shmueli K, de Zwart J, Duyn J. Susceptibility contrast in high field MRI of human brain as a function of tissue iron content. NeuroImage. 2009;44(4):1259-66.
15. Acosta-Cabronero J, Milovic C, Mattern H, Tejos C, Speck O, Callaghan MF. A robust multi-scale approach to quantitative susceptibility mapping. NeuroImage. 2018;183.
Figure 1 Sketch map and scoring criteria of the hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign.
(A) A sketch map of the hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign with a linear hyperintensity (arrow) at the lateral border of the globus pallidus and a hypointense signal of the globus pallidus and putamen on axial SWI image of the basal ganglia. (B) Scoring criteria of the hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign show NWD patients with a score of 2 (a) and a score of 1 (b) on both sides, and HC (c) and EOPD patient (d) with a score of 0 on both sides.
Figure 2 Flowchart of the image assessment procedures.
First, all participants underwent 7T MRI scanning. Second, a novel imaging feature, the hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign, was identified and subsequently evaluated in other diseases and T2/SWI hypointensity were also assessed in all participants. Meanwhile, a semiquantitative scale was developed for correlation analysis. Finally, quantitative susceptibility mapping and principal component analysis of the putamen and globus pallidus were performed.
Figure 3 SWI images of the basal ganglia in the NWD, nNWD, and HC groups.
Axial 7T SWI images of the basal ganglia show typical NWD patients (A1)-(A6), age-matched HC (B1)-(B6) and nNWD patients (C1)-(C6). The hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign is only observed in NWD patients.
Figure 4 SWI images of the basal ganglia in the monoallelic ATP7B variant carriers, EOPD, MSA-P, MSA-C, PSP, and NBIA groups.
Axial 7T SWI images of the basal ganglia show negative hyperintense globus pallidus rim sign in monoallelic ATP7B variant carriers (A1)-(A3), EOPD patients (B1)-(B3), MSA-P patients (C1)-(C3), MSA-C patients (D1)-(D3), PSP patients (E1)-(E3), and NBIA patients (F1)-(H3).
Figure 5 Comparison of QSM values and PCA of QSM.
(A) Comparison of QSM values of the NWD, nNWD, EOPD, MSA-P, MSA-C, PSP, and HC groups. (B) Regional weights of the QSM component in the NWD, MSA-P, MSA-C, and PSP groups compared with HC, respectively. The colours represent the region-specific weights on each component.* P < 0.05, ** P < 0.001.