Keywords: High-Field MRI, Quantitative Imaging, 23Na, Sodium, parallel transmit (pTx), TIAMO, tissue sodium concentration (TSC), 7T whole-body coils, Body, Data Acquisition, High-Field MRI, Hybrid & Novel Systems Technology, Kidney, Liver, Multi-Contrast, Non-Proton, Whole Body
Motivation: 23Na MRI enables the quantification of the tissue sodium concentration. A large field-of-view is beneficial for abdominal MRI, especially if several organs are of interest. Due to lower resolution compared to 1H MRI, 23Na MRI is less suited for segmentation.
Goal(s): To combine large field-of-view 1H and quantitative abdominal 23Na MRI in the same position at 7T.
Approach: Employing a custom-built 23Na radiofrequency coil and reference vial setup together with a 32-channel proton pTx array to allow dual-nuclei MRI in the same position.
Results: Combination of large field-of-view 1H and quantitative 23Na MRI of the human torso is feasible at 7T in ≤42min.
Impact: This work shows the feasibility of combined 1H and 23Na imaging at 7T in a large field-of-view both under free breathing, laying the ground work for an accurate evaluation of the tissue sodium concentration in several organs at once.
2. T. Platt et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2018). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.27103
3. S. Orzada et al. Plos One (2019). https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0222452
4. A. M. Nagel et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22157
5. R. W. Chan et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2009). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.21837
6. S. Orzada et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.22527
7. J. A. Fessler et al. IEEE Trans. Signal Process. (2003). https://doi.org/10.1109/TSP.2002.807005
8. S. Dietrich et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2020). https://doi.org/10.1002/mrm.28602
9. G. Cruz G et al. Magn. Reson. Med. (2016). https://doi.org/10.1002%2Fmrm.25708
10. A. K. Scheipers et al. ISMRM Workshop on Ultra-High Field MR (2022). Poster: 64.
11. A. Christ et al. Phys. Med. Biol. (2010). https://doi.org/10.1088/0031-9155/55/2/N01
12. S. Gabriel et al. Phys. Med. Biol. (1996). https://doi.org/10.1002/10.1088/0031-9155/41/11/002
13. CST Studio Suite 2019/2020 (Dassault Systèmes, Vélizy-Villacoublay, France)
14. A. K. Scheipers et al. Proc. Intl. Soc. Mag. Reson. Med. 30 (2021). Abstract: 0238.
15. The MathWorks Inc., Natick, MA, USA
Tab. 1: Acquisition parameters and reconstruction settings for the different sequences
Fig. 1: 1H DA-3DPR image, quantitative 23Na image and overlay for volunteer one (a) with the kidneys visible and for volunteer two (b) with the heart visible. The reference vial setup under the volunteer’s back was used for the concentration determination. 7T-related 1H signal dropouts can be observed in e.g. the liver of volunteer one.
Fig. 2: 1H 3D GRE-RPE static pTx images, quantitative 23Na image and overlay for volunteer one (a) with the kidneys visible and for volunteer two (b) with the heart visible. The contrast within, for example, the kidneys of volunteer one is superior to the undersampled DA-3DPR image in Fig. 1, but there are still some ultrahigh-field-related 1H signal dropouts as can be seen in the liver of volunteer one.
Fig. 3: 1H DA-3DPR and 3D GRE-RPE static pTx images for volunteer one with the kidneys visible. The contrast within the kidneys of volunteer one in the 3D GRE-RPE is superior to the DA-3DPR image, potentially due to the higher flip angle and shorter TR. Ultrahigh-field-related 1H signal dropouts for example in the liver are more pronounced in the 3D GRE-RPE image (CP+) compared to the DA-3DPR image (TIAMO). DA-3DPR images cover a larger field-of-view but also show some artifacts arising from the reference vial setup, which might be less pronounced for a smaller undersampling factor.
Fig. 4: Animated illustration of the 1H DA-3DPR image and quantitative 23Na image of volunteer one showing every third slice in a subset of 14cm.